The cover story for the June/July ‘26 issue of Food Safety Magazine discusses best practices for using existing organizational momentum to drive food safety culture improvementand keep SQF scores high. Additional features explore key factors for producing aseptic beverages, contextualizing toxicology and human exposure data related to pesticide residues in food, and the importance of workforce investment to a strong food safety culture.
This article shares best practices for using existing organizational momentum to drive food safety culture improvementand keep SQF scores high. It also suggests ways to cast a wide net to gather ideas for continual improvement that will reduce risk and better protect public health.
In aseptic systems, product sterilization is only one part of a much larger control strategy. FDA's Acidified and Low-Acid Canned Foods framework outlines the regulatory requirements for producing aseptic products, but a functioning system also depends on effective sanitation, strong control of ingredients and packaging materials, and robust maintenance.
When workforce capability receives limited attention, it raises broader questions about leadership commitment to protecting both employees and consumers. Building a strong food safety culture requires more than policies and audits; it requires sustained investment in the people responsible for providing safe food every day.
AI has moved into food safety programsfaster than policies, procedures, and comfort levelscan adapt. The gap between what organizations say and what people doregarding AI use is one of the most interesting—and potentially risky—signals from this Food Safety Insights survey.