The Swedish Food Agency (Livsmedelsverket) has released a new report highlighting the growing challenge of food fraud in Sweden. According to the findings, the number of cases detected through routine inspections and targeted enforcement actions continues to rise.

Although there is no legally binding definition within EU law of what constitutes food fraud, the report categorizes incidents as “food fraud” when they:

• Infringe Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625
• Mislead buyers
• Aim for financial gain
• Are intentional.

Food fraud encompasses a range of activities, from incorrect labeling and falsified origin information to economically motivated adulteration and product dilution.

According to the report, food fraud is not only systematic but often organized, creating significant harm for consumers and legitimate businesses. The estimated annual cost to Swedish society is at least $13.6 billion SEK (approximately $1.5 billion USD), which is roughly 3 percent of the food industry’s turnover.

Examples of Food Fraud in Sweden

The Swedish Food Agency receives hundreds of public tips each year, and in 2024, more than half involved suspected fraud. Common issues included meat products, produce, and incorrect date markings.

An EU-wide inspection in 2024 revealed that 600 tons of rice sold in Sweden were mislabeled. In some cases, the rice was of lower quality or a different variety than claimed. Unsafe rice was destroyed, and sales bans were issued.

A Growing Global Concern

Food fraud is a global issue. The Swedish Food Agency cites data from the EU’s Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF), which included notifications for more than 3,300 suspected cases of food fraud, representing a 24 percent increase from the previous year. Spices, cereals, supplements, and fresh produce were among the most frequently flagged products.

Relatedly, the EU recently published a dashboard mapping thousands of food fraud cases since 2016.

Addressing Food Fraud in Sweden

The Swedish Food Agency underlines the far-reaching consequences of food fraud, which puts consumers at risk of deception and health hazards, causes unfair competition and loss of trust for businesses, and burdens regulatory authorities.

To reduce the socio-economic impact of food fraud, the report recommends:

• More systematic inspections
• Improved data collection
• Stronger collaboration between authorities and industry
• Enhanced EU-level coordination
• Increased focus on prevention.

The Swedish Food Agency supports proposals for stronger fraud controls. The agency is preparing upcoming government directives to implement measures to address the growing problem of food fraud.