Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin instagram youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • NEWSLETTERS >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
NewsContamination ControlManagementRegulatoryRisk AssessmentMicrobiological ControlInternational Standards/Harmonization

JERMA Develops Four New Risk Assessment Models for Listeria

By Bailee Henderson
frozen vegetables

Credit: Tohid Hashemkhani (tohid-hashemkhani-3935807) via Pexels

November 30, 2022

In response to a request by the Codex Committee on Food Hygiene, experts associated with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) are focusing on Listeria monocytogenes. The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meetings on Microbial Risk Assessment (JERMA) convened around the topic October 24–28, 2022 in Rome, Italy.

The experts developed risk assessment models for L. monocytogenes on leafy greens, frozen vegetables, cantaloupe melon, and ready-to-eat (RTE) seafood. The group also provided recommendations to inform possible future revisions to the Codex Alimentarius “Guidelines on the Application of General Principles of Food Hygiene to the Control of Listeria monocytogenes in Foods.”

In light of current data and risk assessment approaches, JERMA agreed that a risk assessment model should consider primary production to consumption, be applied in a modular approach, and be flexible for reuse with other similar food commodities. The experts note that the primary production (pre-harvest) module should take into account how the introduction of L. monocytogenes into raw materials is influenced by season, agrifood practices, and climate change. Additionally, the possibility of cross-contamination from primary production to consumption should be considered.

Updated risk assessment models will adapt the dose response from existing models that take into account variability in pathogen virulence and consumer susceptibility, and are common to all food commodities. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) and other genomomics data on L. monocytogenes may also inform the risk assessment; however, the uncertainty between phenotypic and genotypic profiles of the pathogen should be carefully examined before being used in risk assessment. For example, the global prevalence of L. monocytogenes in exposure assessment can be replaced by the specific prevalence for groups of sequence types and clonal complexes (STs/CCs) when WGS has demonstrated that groups of STs/CCs are overrepresented in a specific commodity.

JERMA underlines that an uncertainty and sensitivity analysis should be performed to identify the model inputs and assumptions that have the greatest impact on the model outputs, which will help identify relevant “what-if” scenarios and data needs. Different modules for various stages of a food chain can be used to evaluate the stages’ impact on risk in “what-if” scenarios.

More data on L. monocytogenes in the food chain from different sampling and testing programs would help to better inform risk assessment, according to the experts. Knowledge of the pathogen’s occurrence, virulence, and dose response would enable risk assessment for different STs/CCs of L. monocytogenes.

Leafy Greens

For leafy greens, JERMA pointed to production activities including irrigation, fertilization, and other on-farm management practices as impactful on the occurrence of L. monocytogenes on the farm, which could be modeled in a primary production (pre-harvest) module. Additionally, the experts recommended the consideration of season within the risk assessment model, as season is a factor that drives the microbial kinetics in soil and on leaves.

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

JERMA identified stages to be represented in the risk assessment, including: growth of leafy greens (field, controlled environment, and hydroponics), harvesting, cooling, washing, sanitizing, cutting, packaging, multiple transportation steps, display at retail, and consumer practices. The model should also be structured to measure the effectiveness of the prevention of contamination by soil and irrigation water, the efficacy of washing with or without sanitizers, the prevention of cross-contamination along the production chain, the application of good hygiene practices (GHPs) during processing, the efficacy of sampling programs, and the impact of consumer handling and storage practices.

Both RTE, cut and packaged leafy greens and non-RTE whole leafy greens should be addressed in the model and should share a common primary production module. Lettuce was proposed as a representative commodity for the leafy greens model.

Frozen Vegetables

The model for frozen vegetables pertains to non-RTE, blanched and frozen vegetables. The main risk factors for L. monocytogenes from frozen vegetables are concentrated in the stages of processing to consumption, and the model should consider contamination post-blanching.

JERMA identified stages to be represented in the risk assessment, including: cleaning; washing; blanching; freezing; packaging; display at retail; and consumer practices such as defrosting, cooking, and common practices relating to non-intended use. Additionally, the model should measure the effectiveness of blanching or other inactivation steps pre- or post-packaging, the prevention of contamination post-blanching, and the efficacy of sampling programs at the end of processing. Finally, the risk assessment should evaluate the impact of different consumer practices related to storage and cooking, and the impact of efforts to shift consumer practices to increase compliance with safe cooking of non-RTE frozen food.

Cantaloupe 

The cantaloupe risk assessment model was designed for whole and RTE diced cantaloupe, considering primary production to consumption. Relevant stages identified by JERMA include: growing on the field, harvesting, cooling, washing, sanitizing, dicing, display at retail, consumer practices, and multiple transportation steps.

Opportunities for cross-contamination of L. monocytogenes throughout cantaloupe production to consumption should be taken into account and include: irrigation water and soil at pre-harvest, pooling water, food contact surfaces, dicing the fruit, and market practices. The risk assessment should also measure the effectiveness of the prevention of contamination during pre-harvest, the application of on-farm preventive measures, the effect of processing, and the impact of consumer practices.

Flexibility is needed in the model to account for the impact of farming practices, extreme weather events, climate change, and diverse market practices. The effect of the time and temperature profiles throughout the food supply chain is also important to include in the risk assessment.

RTE Seafood

The model for RTE seafood takes into account primary production (harvest and farming) to consumption, and hot- and cold-smoked fish and gravad fish were proposed as representative foods for the category. The risk assessment should be flexible to accommodate other RTE fish products in the future such as sashimi and ceviche, the experts noted.

Relevant stages to be represented in the risk assessment were by identified JERMA, including: growth of fish (open sea and aquaculture), harvesting, evisceration and head cutting, filleting, different smoking steps, gravad fish steps, freezing, slicing, packaging, multiple transportation steps, retail, and consumer handling. Cross-contamination should be considered in the model because RTE fish products are produced in several steps, sometimes in different facilities spanning national borders.

JERMA suggests that the effect of added lactic acid bacteria cultures for biocontrol of L. monocytogenes be evaluated in the risk assessment. The experts also state that WGS/strain typing data could be used to assess dominant strains at different production stages to inform the cross-contamination module.

Next Steps

As a next step, the models proposed by JERMA should be programmed, tested, and reviewed. The review should verify that the models are flexible to run different scenarios and incorporate new data to account for national, regional, and international context.

Following the review, the models should be made publicly available. JERMA believes the novel models have the potential to advance knowledge on L. monocytogenes hazards as they incorporate advances in next generation technologies, and span the stages from primary production to consumption.

KEYWORDS: Codex FAO frozen vegetables JEMRA leafy greens listeria melon risk assessment RTE foods seafood WHO

Share This Story

Baileehendersonmay23

Bailee Henderson is the Digital Editor of Food Safety Magazine, where she covers industry-relevant current events, regulatory affairs, and scientific developments. She also produces the Food Safety Five Newsreel. Notably, Bailee's coverage for Food Safety Magazine has been featured in national televised news segments including CBS Sunday Morning and MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Show. She can be reached at hendersonb@bnpmedia.com.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Testing & Analysis
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Food Prep/Handling
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    International
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to Newsletters
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • NEVIFIT 3 Compartment BPA-FREE
    Sponsored byCorbion

    The Risks of Ready-to-Eat: Five Ways to Protect Today's Prepared Meals

  • a group of workers in a food production facility
    Sponsored bySkillUp by Registrar Corp

    How to Build a Better Training Program: Data and Insights from the Global Food Safety Training Survey

  • the use of dual-energy X-ray food inspection technology to identify foreign contaminants.
    Sponsored byEagle by METTLER TOLEDO

    Precision Inspection Starts with the Right X-ray Detector

Popular Stories

green powder/moringa in wooden mortar

FDA Opens Third Salmonella–Moringa Outbreak Investigation of the Year

FoodSafetyMattersFinal-900x550-(002).jpg

Ep. 218. Dr. Brady Carter: Water Activity, Shelf-Life Validation, and Food Safety Controls

fermented meat

Study is First to Analyze Trends in Foodborne Illness Outbreaks Linked to Non-Dairy Fermented Products

a practical guide to spoilage investigation webinar

Events

June 3, 2026

How to Build a Better Food Safety Training Program

Live: June 3, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Join this webinar to learn how AI is impacting food safety training, and how you can leverage AI in your programs.

June 4, 2026

Building a Stronger Food Safety Program in a Changing GFSI Landscape

Live: June 4, 2026 at 11:00 am EDT: Attend this webinar to understand how GFSI requirements are evolving and what those changes signal for quality programs at food and beverage facilities.

June 10, 2026

A Practical Guide to Spoilage Investigation and Prevention

Live: June 10, 2026 at 11:00 am EDT: Join this webinar to learn how to identify spoilage root causes, reduce risk, and apply data-driven strategies for prevention.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • diced cantaloupe next to half of cantaloupe melon

    FAO/WHO Developing Risk Assessment Models for Listeria in Four Food Commodity Groups

    See More
  • greek salad

    Review Identifies Gaps in Existing Quantitative Risk Assessment Models for Listeria on Produce

    See More
  • Food Safety Strategies coronavirus news

    Coronavirus update: FDA prepares for resumption of domestic inspections with new risk assessment system

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • food safety.jpg

    Food Safety Contaminants and Risk Assessment

  • 9781138070912.jpg

    Trends in Food Safety and Protection

  • Food-Forensics-3D.jpg

    Food Forensics Handbook Practice, Instrumentation, Case Studies

See More Products

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • May 6, 2026

    Allergen Uncertainty: Risk Assessment, Reference Doses, and Codex Management Guidance

    On Demand: Attendees will gain insight into the importance of preparing for the industry's shift from detection-based methods to risk-based allergen management.
View AllSubmit An Event

Related Directories

  • Magnattack

    Specialists in foreign metal fragment control and magnetic separation for diverse industries, ranging from food and beverage processing to pharmaceuticals, plastics recycling, and chemical production. Magnattack offer powerful magnetic separation solutions and specialized services, including magnet validations and plant risk assessments.
  • NEMIS Technologies

    At NEMIS, we are setting new standards in environmental monitoring, helping your facility stay audit-ready and protected from contamination. Our cutting-edge solutions are designed to proactively identify and address risks, transforming how food safety is upheld in production environments.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing