Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin instagram youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • NEWSLETTERS >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
NewsContamination ControlFood TypeProcess ControlRegulatoryMicrobiological ControlProcess ValidationMeat/PoultryReady-to-eatUSDA

Product Testing Suggests USDA-FSIS Regulations for C. perfringens in Meat May Be ‘Overly Conservative’

By Bailee Henderson
slices of cured pork or bacon
Image credit: topntp26 via Magnific
June 18, 2026

An analysis of real-world data for Clostridium perfringens in ready-to-eat (RTE) and not-ready-to-eat (NRTE) meat products at the manufacturing level found very few positive samples, suggesting that U.S. regulatory limits for the pathogen may be “overly conservative.” The study was conducted by researchers associated with the University of Wisconsin, and the findings were published in the Journal of Food Protection.

USDA-FSIS C. perfringens Regulations and Appendix B Guidelines

Under U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA-FSIS) regulations, the potential growth of C. perfringens during thermally processed product chilling (i.e., stabilization) must not exceed 1 CFU/g. USDA-FSIS’ Stabilization Guideline for Meat and Poultry Products (Revised Appendix B) describes “safe harbors,” or cooling and hot-holding parameters to prevent the growth of spore-forming Clostridia.

Despite this regulatory focus on C. perfringens control at the production level, the literature shows that the majority of C. perfringens illness outbreaks attributed to meat or poultry consumption were due to mishandling at foodservice operations rather than the manufacturing of products at FSIS-inspected establishments.

A USDA quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) predicted that a tenfold or a 100-fold increase in C. perfringens during stabilization would result in a 1.2 or 1.6-fold increase in illnesses due to increased pathogen growth, respectively. Moreover, a small market basket survey conducted by FSIS in 2023 found that just one sample out of 494 total samples was positive for C. perfringens spores, with a count of 1.08 log CFU/g. Based on the findings of this basket study, FSIS concluded that Appendix B guidance is adequate and does not merit revision.

Real-World Meat Processor Data

Given the need for additional data to improve risk assessments, the objective of the present study was to analyze additional data regarding the number of C. perfringens organisms in raw materials and those that survive the cook/chill process in commercial U.S. meat products.

The researchers solicited C. perfringens sampling and testing data from three volunteer, high-volume meat processors, including cooked RTE and raw goods, representing products produced between 2015 and 2019, and 2022 to 2023. The cooked RTE product data included 3,141 cooked products not related to process deviations, while data collected from 2,886 products originated from process deviations determined not to meet the “safe harbors” outlined in Appendix B. 

Low C. perfringens Prevalence in Raw and Cooked Samples

Analysis of 2,025 samples of raw, mildly heat-treated, and not fully cooked products collected by participating companies showed that C. perfringens was rarely detected. Overall, 86.7 percent of samples were below the limit of detection (greater than 1 log CFU/g), while 12.4 percent contained 1–2 log CFU/g. Less than 1 percent of samples exceeded 2 log CFU/g, and only five samples, all from heat-treated but not fully cooked bacon products, contained 4–5 log CFU/g.

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

The researchers noted that, although elevated C. perfringens levels were occasionally observed in raw materials and certain partially cooked products, standard commercial cooking processes are highly effective at reducing vegetative cells. Modeling based on commercial bacon, hot dog, and ham cooking schedules predicted reductions ranging from 1.75 log CFU/g in bacon to greater than 135 log CFU/g in fully cooked hot dogs, with a 15.4-log reduction predicted for ham. These findings suggested that conventional thermal processes used for fully cooked meat products are sufficient to inactivate C. perfringens, even when initial levels exceed 4 log CFU/g.

Among 3,141 fully cooked RTE product samples that were not associated with process deviations, 99.75 percent contained no detectable C. perfringens. Only eight samples contained 1–2 log CFU/g, and no samples exceeded 2 log CFU/g. The researchers calculated the probability of finding C. perfringens levels above 2 log CFU/g in commercially produced cooked products to be extremely low.

Minimal Impact Observed from Cooling Deviations

The study also examined 2,886 RTE meat samples associated with process deviations, including products that did not meet USDA-FSIS Appendix B "safe harbor" cooling parameters or company-established cooling limits. Despite these deviations, 99.86 percent of samples were below the limit of detection, and only four samples contained 1–2 log CFU/g. No samples exceeded 2 log CFU/g.

Based on the data, the probability of C. perfringens counts exceeding 2 log CFU/g because of a cooling deviation was calculated to be 0.00128. The researchers said the findings indicate that commercially produced meat and poultry products rarely contain C. perfringens at levels considered a food safety concern, even when cooling processes fall outside Appendix B “safe harbors.”

Implications for FSIS Stabilization Requirements

According to the researchers, the data suggest that C. perfringens is unlikely to survive commercial cooking processes in fully cooked products at detectable levels and, when present, is generally found at populations below 2 log CFU/g. Because illness is typically associated with much higher concentrations of vegetative cells, substantial growth would be required after cooking to reach levels capable of causing disease.

The researchers concluded that, while C. perfringens can occur in raw materials and certain heat-treated, not fully cooked products, commercial thermal processing followed by cooling consistently reduces the organism to below detectable levels in finished products. In light of these findings, they suggested that the scientific basis for USDA-FSIS' requirement that growth during stabilization not exceed 1 log CFU/g may be overly conservative and could warrant reevaluation as additional data become available.

KEYWORDS: Appendix A & B Clostridium perfringens cooling study University of Wisconsin

Share This Story

Baileehendersonmay23

Bailee Henderson is the Digital Editor of Food Safety Magazine, where she covers industry-relevant current events, regulatory affairs, and scientific developments. She also produces the Food Safety Five Newsreel. Notably, Bailee's coverage for Food Safety Magazine has been featured in national televised news segments including CBS Sunday Morning and MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Show. She can be reached at hendersonb@bnpmedia.com.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Microbiological Control
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Sanitation
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Contamination Control
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to Newsletters
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Darkling Beetle
    Sponsored byElanco Animal Health

    Integrated Pest Management: Protecting Poultry Operations as Seasons Change

  • NEVIFIT 3 Compartment BPA-FREE
    Sponsored byCorbion

    The Risks of Ready-to-Eat: Five Ways to Protect Today's Prepared Meals

  • a group of workers in a food production facility
    Sponsored bySkillUp by Registrar Corp

    How to Build a Better Training Program: Data and Insights from the Global Food Safety Training Survey

Popular Stories

nara organics whole milk infant formula

Another Infant Botulism Outbreak Sickens Three, Nara Organics Formula Suspected Cause

diverse group of people wearing protective clothing in food production plant

EU Member States Report Challenges in Implementing Food Safety Culture Official Controls

logistics managers in warehouse talking looking at tablet

FDA Traceability Rule Readiness Exercises Reveal Supply Chain Coordination Matters More than Technology

Events

June 25, 2026

Rethinking Food Safety: Eliminating Biofilm and Building a Smarter Food Safety System

Live: June 25, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Join this webinar to explore a modern approach to decontamination that goes beyond surface-level cleaning to combat biofilm and persistent pathogens.

June 30, 2026

FSMA 204 in Practice: Building a Traceability-Ready Operation

Live: June 30, 2026 at 11:00 am EDT: Attend this webinar to learn how food businesses can move from fragmented records toward a more reliable approach for recall response, FDA requests, and supply chain visibility.

August 6, 2026

Beyond Sanitation: Understanding the Hidden System Conditions That Allow Pathogens to Persist

Live: August 6, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Attend this webinar to learn strategies for strengthening environmental control programs through a layered approach to pathogen management.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • infant formula and bottle

    FDA to Begin Testing Infant Formula Products, Ingredients for C. botulinum

    See More
  • Hygiena Innovate System

    Hygiena Dairy and Beverage Kits First to be AOAC-Certified for Entire Product Testing Workflow

    See More
  • packaged raw meat in cooler

    USDA-FSIS Updates Guidance for Retained Water in Meat and Poultry Products

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 1118396308.jpg

    High Throughput Analysis for Food Safety

  • 9781138070912.jpg

    Trends in Food Safety and Protection

  • 1119160553.jpg

    Food Safety: Innovative Analytical Tools for Safety Assessment

See More Products

Related Directories

  • CBC Coating Inc.

    CBC is a privately held contract coater treating every customer confidentially. Our process is specifically designed for your success. Please call for a brief exploratory call to determine how we may be of service.
  • Eagle Product Inspection

    Eagle Product Inspection is a leading manufacturer of hygienically designed x-ray equipment & inline fat analysis systems. Eagle specializes in complex x-ray inspection solutions using dual energy photon-counting technology for bone detection and inline fat analysis for a wide variety of industries, including meat, poultry and seafood.
  • METTLER TOLEDO Product Inspection

    METTLER TOLEDO provides inspection solutions that boost profits, protect your brand, and help you comply with food safety regulations. Our full range of metal detectors, checkweighers, x-ray and vision inspection systems eliminate metal and foreign material in liquid or packaged products, verify weights, and ensure accuracy and integrity of packaging and labels.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing