Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin instagram youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • Sponsored Insights
    • Sponsored White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • NEWSLETTERS >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
NewsContamination ControlSanitationMicrobiological ControlBiofilm ControlCleaners/SanitizersFacilitiesSanitation

Efficacy of Eco-Friendly Sanitation Methods Against Listeria Biofilms in Food Production Environments

By Bailee Henderson
digitized rod shaped bacteria biofilm

Image credit: Canva Magic Media

February 6, 2024

The implementation of environmentally friendly, anti-biofilm treatments for Listeria monocytogenes in food production establishments should begin from an in-depth knowledge of individual environments and cannot disregard possible resistance patterns that the pathogen could develop, according to a recent study.

Alongside traditional decontamination methods, in recent years, environmentally friendly sanitation techniques including electrolyzed water, plasma-activated water, ozone, and enzymes, have been proposed as anti-biofilm strategies with considerable antimicrobial potential. However, some data has shown significant variability in the response of L. monocytogenes biofilms to these approaches, perhaps due to different environmental conditions and parameters, as well as genetic determinants or resistance mechanisms of different strains. The study involved a review of available recent literature on the effect that various eco-friendly inactivation techniques have on L. monocytogenes biofilms.

In general, data suggest that when biofilm is the target, it is recommended to increase active ingredient concentrations and exposure times as much as possible, bearing in mind production cycles and possible toxicity for operators of certain substances. Intervention strategies should also be designed according to surface materials in the production environment, as the anti-biofilm effect may differ across substances. The presence of residual organic matter in the environment can also affect the antimicrobial power of the technologies and increase the tolerance of strains.

The researchers found that voltage, electrolysis time, and sodium chloride concentration are important parameters affecting the physicochemical properties of electrolyzed water and, therefore, the antimicrobial effect. Available chlorine concentration proved to be the main factor affecting slightly acidic electrolyzed water. Among the types of electrolyzed water, the acidic type demonstrated the greatest antimicrobial activity, but its strong acidity and corrosive potential may limit its long-term use on surfaces. Slightly acidic and neutral electrolyzed water have been proposed to solve problems related to low pH. However, alkaline electrolyzed water can have fewer applications as disinfectant due to its poor bactericidal efficiency, but data suggest that it may be useful in certain post-harvest treatments of fruits.

Regarding plasma-activated water, although its disinfection ability against planktonic bacteria has been largely demonstrated, its efficacy against biofilm is still debated. Some studies have shown a direct relationship between plasma-activated water generation parameters and biocidal activity, and while plasma-activated water has shown effective colony-forming reduction, scanning electron microscopy images revealed relatively low structural damages, and confocal laser scanning microscopy confirmed a partial inactivation of cells, but not death. These findings suggest that, alongside classical viable cell counts, it would be useful to study the anti-biofilm effect of plasma-activated water treatments by combining multiple methods, to help reveal the impact of plasma-activated water on biofilm structure and detecting damaged but still living bacteria. These cells may become not detectable on standard culture media and could potentially persist in environments and form biofilms again.

Ozone has been studied extensively for its biocidal activity and various parameters are known to influence its efficacy, such as pH, radicals concentration, temperature, and relative humidity. Both aqueous and gaseous forms have antimicrobial action. The former has higher biocidal activity, while the latter has longer half-life, which may represent a favorable property for biofilm removal, although high concentrations are required to achieve an effect on biofilm. The high concentrations of ozone required to counteract biofilm can limit the application of ozone to closing days or in the absence of operators, since it can be toxic to humans. Its possible corrosive effect on materials resulting from long-term use must also be evaluated.

Enzymes have been studied for their action on biofilm matrix, quorum sensing signaling, and adhesiveness to cells and other enzymes involved in microorganism growth. The efficacy of enzyme products is greatly determined by their composition and can be affected by application temperature. Since enzymatic detergents can facilitate conventional cleaners’ penetration in cells due to their biofilm matrix-disrupting ability, their use has been proposed in combination with chlorine disinfectants. One study suggested bromelain to have the greatest anti-biofilm effect by interrupting certain processes of L. monocytogenes, and that it could be suitable for food processing applications.

Finally, L. monocytogenes strain-dependent behavior after stress exposure was recently observed in different surveys on biofilm. A complete preliminary mapping of genetic features and stress response mechanisms of strains in each facility in which a given technology will be applied would be ideal, but is unrealistic. Future studies on the anti-biofilm effect of eco-friendly inactivation methods should include a greater variety of wild-type strains, to better understand the strain-dependent response to stressors and strain-specific features determining resistance.

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

KEYWORDS: biofilm electrolyzed water enzymes ozone plasma-activated water

Share This Story

Baileehendersonmay23

Bailee Henderson is the Director of Content Strategy for Food Safety Magazine. In the day-to-day, she covers industry-relevant current events, regulatory affairs, and scientific developments. She also produces the Food Safety Five Newsreel and edits the twice-weekly Food Safety Digest newsletter. Notably, Bailee's coverage for Food Safety Magazine has been featured in national televised news segments including CBS Sunday Morning and MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Show. She can be reached at hendersonb@bnpmedia.com.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Microbiological Control
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Sanitation
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    International
    By: Shamini Albert Raj M.A. and Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to Newsletters
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • an automated industrial production line used in a modern food factory
    Sponsored byIFC

    A Formula for Food Processing Pest Management

  • fly
    Sponsored byOrkin Commercial

    Fly Control in Food Processing Facilities: Managing Seasonal Food Safety Risks

  • Darkling Beetle
    Sponsored byElanco Animal Health

    Integrated Pest Management: Protecting Poultry Operations as Seasons Change

Popular Stories

Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts

Foodborne Parasite Cyclospora Sickens Hundreds Across U.S.

naturally colored cupcakes with sprinkles

Natural vs. Artificial Ingredients in Baking: What Food Manufacturers and Consumers Need to Know

Cyclospora cayetanensis oocyst

Cyclospora Cases Climb, But Actual Number Unclear as CDC Reporting Lags Behind States

building a skilled workforce ebook

Events

July 21, 2026

Using AI Responsibly in Food Safety Management Systems

Live: July 21, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: This webinar will provide participants with guidance on how to effectively use generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools to develop key components of a food safety management system (FSMS).

August 6, 2026

Beyond Sanitation: Understanding the Hidden System Conditions That Allow Pathogens to Persist

Live: August 6, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Attend this webinar to learn strategies for strengthening environmental control programs through a layered approach to pathogen management.

August 11, 2026

Beyond Sanitization: Reducing Contamination Risk Without Raising Operating Cost

Live: August 11, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Attend this webinar to learn why ambient air is the largest and most overlooked contamination zone in food processing, and what it costs you between scheduled cleans.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • lettuce close up

    Study Explores Sanitizer Limitations Against Listeria Biofilms in Leafy Greens Production

    See More
  • top of an apple

    Defects, Organic Matter on Food Contact Surfaces Reduces Sanitizer Efficacy Against Listeria Biofilms

    See More
  • milk processing

    RNA-Based Project to Study AMR Behaviors of Listeria Biofilms in Dairy Processing

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 9781138070912.jpg

    Trends in Food Safety and Protection

  • 9781498721776.jpg

    Handbook of Food Processing: Food Safety, Quality, and Manufacturing Processes

  • 1444333348.jpg

    Handbook of Food Safety Engineering

See More Products

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • March 26, 2026

    Continuous Pathogen Control: Enhancing Sanitation and Environmental Monitoring in Food Processing

    On Demand: This session explores the role of continuous airborne pathogen control technology in supporting sanitation and environmental monitoring programs within food processing environments.
  • September 2, 2026

    From Crisis to Control: A Listeria Elimination Journey in Food Manufacturing

    Live: September 2, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: This webinar shares a real-world case study of a food processing facility that solved a persistent Listeria challenge after standard protocols fell short.
View AllSubmit An Event

Related Directories

  • Food Production Solutions Assn. & EATS

    The Food Production Solutions Association (FPSA) is dedicated to delivering innovative food and technology solutions, meaningful education, industry engagement, philanthropy, and advocacy to advance member companies and the greater food production industry. FPSA is a dynamic community of food production industry leaders and experts, where collaboration and innovation lead the future of food production.
  • Food Radar Systems in Sweden AB

    Food Radar Systems, based in Sweden, develops microwave technology that detects and rejects low-density foreign bodies in pumpable food products, helping food manufacturers improve safety, protect consumers, and strengthen quality assurance in modern production environments.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing