Food Safety
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • ENEWSLETTER >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
NewsContamination ControlChemical

Half of U.S. Drinking Water Contaminated by Toxic PFAS, Reports USGS

By Bailee Henderson
child filling drinking cup with tap water

Image credit: LuAnn Hunt via Unsplash

July 11, 2023

A nationwide study conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has revealed that nearly half of all U.S. drinking water is contaminated by per- and polyflouralkyl substances (PFAS), also known as “forever chemicals” due to their indefinite persistence in the environment and human body. Dietary exposure to PFAS is an issue of increasing concern due to the growing body of evidence regarding the chemicals’ harm to human health, having been linked to metabolic and thyroid harm, as well as cancer, liver damage, increased cholesterol, and immune effects.

The study’s authors stress that, based on their findings, there is a need for or point-of-use tap water monitoring, with an emphasis on unmonitored private wells and underserved communities on small community water supplies.

For the study, researchers conducted a national reconnaissance to compare human PFAS exposures in unregulated private wells and regulated public-supply tap water. From 2016–2021, a total of 716 tap water samples were collected from residences, businesses, and drinking water treatment plants across the U.S., 409 of which were collected at point-of-use from 155 unregulated private wells and 252 regulated public supply locations in all 50 states, Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Repeated sampling was conducted at three locations (two private wells and one public supply) to assess temporal changes in PFAS concentrations and profiles. PFAS data from an additional 307 tap water samples (112 private wells and 195 public supply) collected as part of the USGS point-of-use tap water research effort between 2016 and 2021 were also included in the present study’s analysis.

PFAS samples were analyzed by three different laboratories for the study: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Exposure Research Laboratory in 2016, the Colorado School of Mines in 2017–2018, and the USGS National Water Quality Laboratory in 2019–2021. The three laboratories determined PFAS concentrations and compared the data with land-use and potential-source metrics to explore drivers of contamination.

Overall, modeling suggested at least 45 percent of US drinking water samples are contaminated by at least one type of PFAS. Additionally, PFAS in tap water samples exceeded benchmarks and U.S. proposed PFAS regulations in private and public supply. Modeling also pointed to point-of-use tap water exposure to individual PFAS being more closely associated with the type of PFAS sources (e.g., industry, airport, wastewater, and etc., which are typically located at the edge of urban development and not in the highest residentially developed areas), rather than the number of nearby potential PFAS sources. Based on the data, drinking water exposures may be more common in the Great Plains, Great Lakes, Eastern Seaboard, and Central/Southern California regions than other areas of the U.S.

Consistent with other studies and large datasets focused on public-supply tap water, at least one PFAS was observed in 30 percent (237 of the 716) of the tap water samples collected throughout the U.S. Additionally, approximately 4 percent of U.S. drinking water treatment plants tested had detectable PFAS, but the breadth of contamination was likely missed due to high detection limits (10–90 nanograms per liter [ng/L], depending on individual PFAS) and a limited number of PFAS analyzed.

The study detected 17 PFAS at least once and, apart from PFPrS, all detected PFAS were analyzed in more than 600 samples. Reporting limits for PFAS observed in the study varied by laboratory and ranged from 0.1 to 20 ng/L. The most frequently detected PFAS analyzed by all laboratories included PFBS (16 percent), PFHxS (15 percent), and PFOA (14 percent). The number of individual PFAS observed ranged from one to nine, with a median of two, and detected concentrations ranged from 0.025–319 ng/L, and corresponding cumulative PFAS concentrations (sum of 16 detected PFAS) ranged from 0.348–346 ng/L.

At least one PFAS was detected in 20 percent (55 of 269) of private-well and 40 percent (182 of 447) of the public supply samples collected throughout the U.S. A similar pattern was reported in groundwater from the eastern U.S., in which 60 percent of public supply wells and 20 percent of monitoring wells contained at least one PFAS. Based on model predictions, the probability of not detecting PFAS above the scientists’ detection limits ranged from approximately 25 percent in urban centers or areas with a known history of PFAS contamination, to 75 percent in rural areas.

Across all data, the probability of detecting at least one PFAS in a water sample was approximately 18 percent, with a marked decrease in probability associated with increasing number of detected compounds. No differences were observed between public supply and private well samples.

In March 2023, EPA proposed new maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for PFOA and PFOS (4 ng/L) as part of the National Primary Drinking Water Standards Rule. Proposed MCLs for PFOA and PFOS were exceeded in 6.7 percent and 4.2 percent of all tap water samples, respectively, but were exceeded in 48 percent (48 of 99) and 70 percent (30 of 43) of tap water samples when detected. The proposed MCL for PFOS was below the reporting limit for two of the three laboratories that took part in the study, and the reporting limit for PFOA was above the proposed MCL for only one laboratory; therefore, the researchers state that their estimates of samples exceeding EPA’s proposed MCL should be considered conservative.

Looking forward, to fully understand exposure and adequately determine risk to human health, the researchers call for continued emphasis on 1) integrating geospatial datasets with PFAS data broadly to identify vulnerable regions/subpopulations, 2) expanding monitoring to include rural small-system and private well-dependent communities, and 3) expanding target and non-target analysis methods, particularly in drinking water monitoring programs in the U.S. and globally.

KEYWORDS: PFAS study water water safety

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Baileehendersonmay23

Bailee Henderson is the Digital Editor of Food Safety Magazine. She can be reached at hendersonb@bnpmedia.com.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Methods
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Food Prep/Handling
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Risk Assessment
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to eNewsletter
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Two men standing in a produce storage facility having a discussion.
    Sponsored byOrkin Commercial

    Staying Compliant With FSMA

  • Deli Salads
    Sponsored byCorbion

    How Food Safety is Becoming the Ultimate Differentiator in Refrigerated and Prepared Foods

Popular Stories

Corporate manager talking with factory employees

Turning Resistance into Opportunity: Motivating Change in the Food Industry

Image of baby being fed infant formula

HHS Budget Request Beats Familiar Drum

Two men standing in a produce storage facility having a discussion.

Staying Compliant With FSMA

Events

June 26, 2025

How to Design and Conduct Challenge Studies for Safer Products and Longer Shelf Life

Live: June 26, 2025 at 2:00 pm EDT: During this webinar, attendees will learn how to conduct challenge studies for microbial spoilage and pathogen growth, including the common challenges encountered, laboratory selection, and use of predictive models.

July 15, 2025

Hygienic Design Risk Management: Industry Challenges and EHEDG Guidance

Live: July 15, 2025 at 11:00 am EDT: From this webinar, attendees will learn the importance of hygienic design to ensure food safety and sanitation effectiveness.

May 11, 2026

The Food Safety Summit

Stay informed on the latest food safety trends, innovations, emerging challenges, and expert analysis. Leave the Summit with actionable insights ready to drive measurable improvements in your organization. Do not miss this opportunity to learn from experts about contamination control, food safety culture, regulations, sanitation, supply chain traceability, and so much more.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products
Environmental Monitoring Excellence eBook

Related Articles

  • salmon jumping upstream in a river

    One Serving of Freshwater Fish Equivalent to Drinking PFAS-Contaminated Water for a Month, U.S. Study Finds

    See More
  • woman drinking water from a glass blue background

    First-of-its-Kind Study Finds Higher Rates of Cancer in Areas With PFAS-Contaminated Drinking Water

    See More
  • clear fresh water splashing

    Scientist Discovers PFAS-Eating Microbes That Could Clean Contaminated Drinking Water

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • food safety.jpg

    Food Safety Contaminants and Risk Assessment

See More Products
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

eNewsletter | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing