Food Safety
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • ENEWSLETTER >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!

Processors must ensure their PCQIs are qualified, trained and experienced

By Richard F. Stier, M.S.
bacterial testing

In some plants, PCQIs responsible for food safety plans, which outline bacterial testing, are new to the industry or trained through internet courses.

Photo courtesy of Getty Images

February 19, 2019

Food processors have a mandate to ensure that they have someone with a new title on board: the preventive controls qualified individual, or PCQI. 

Under the definitions finalized in 21 CFR Part 117.3 of the Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food, a preventive controls qualified individual means:

“… a qualified individual who has successfully completed training in the development and application of risk-based preventive controls at least equivalent to that received under a standardized curriculum recognized as adequate by FDA or is otherwise qualified through job experience to develop and apply a food safety system.”

A perusal of the regulation defines the role and duties of the PCQI. These duties are summarized in 21 CFR Part 117.180. The citations specifically define what makes up each of these duties of the PCQI:

  1. Preparation of the food safety plan (§ 117.126(a)(2))
  2. Validation of the preventive controls (§ 117.160(b)(1))
  3. Written justification for validation to be performed in a timeframe that exceeds the first 90 calendar days of production of the applicable food
  4. Determination that validation is not required (§ 117.160(c)(5))
  5. Review of records (§ 117.165(a)(4))
  6. Written justification for review of records of monitoring and corrective actions within a timeframe that exceeds 7 working days
  7. Reanalysis of the food safety plan (§ 117.170(d))
  8. Determination that reanalysis can be completed, and additional preventive controls validated, as appropriate to the nature of the preventive control and its role in the facility’s food safety system, in a timeframe that exceeds the first 90 calendar days of production of the applicable food

The regulation also states that these duties may be performed by one or more PCQIs, that a company’s PCQI need not be an employee and that some of these tasks, such as record review, may be done by a trained individual under the supervision of a PCQI. So, although the PCQI or PCQIs have full plates, they do not need to do everything themselves—provided they have taken the time and made the effort to train someone to do work under their supervision.

The two most challenging tasks for PCQIs are the development of the food safety plan and validation of the process preventive controls. Going hand in hand with this last point is making a decision as to whether a preventive control requires validation.

Remember, the regulation specifically states that allergen, sanitation, supplier and recall preventive controls need not be validated. But there is nothing to prevent a company from going beyond regulation.

For example, many processors that are manufacturing foods that contain allergens have taken the time and made the effort to validate their allergen cleaning programs. This strengthens their overall program and further protects the consumer.  

So, let’s take a step back and look at what the FDA is asking of the PCQI and how we might define the position. Given the two main challenges highlighted in the previous paragraph, the PCQI must be a food safety expert and a process authority, or someone with similar expertise. 

Without significant, broad-based knowledge in these two areas, the PCQI would be under enormous pressure to accomplish the tasks defined in the regulation. The greatest gap in knowledge would be the process authority. There are many persons in the industry who may deem themselves to be process authorities, but not all of them possess the necessary background, knowledge and expertise to develop and validate food safety processes. 

Let’s consider an example from the Almond Board of California, which has mandated that California almonds be processed to ensure safety in response to salmonella outbreaks attributed to raw almonds. Processes must be established and validated by process authorities recognized by the Almond Board of California.

The following criteria were used as a basis for what was expected from a process authority:

  • Knowledge about product characteristics and equipment used for the treatment process, which would include access to the necessary equipment and microorganisms needed to do the work
  • Experience in conducting appropriate studies to determine the ability of equipment to deliver the appropriate treatment, which would include any necessary microbial challenge studies
  • Ability to evaluate whether data gathered is sufficient to identify the critical factors needed to ensure the safety of the final product
  • Expertise to evaluate the ability of the processor to adhere to the requirements of the prescribed treatment
  • Ability and expertise to ensure the processor understands the process, the defined critical factors and how to measure and control them
  • Ability to evaluate potential deviations to determine whether a lot is a potential health hazard and make appropriate recommendations to ensure proper disposition (destruction, reprocessing, release)

With that, if we go back to our definition of a PCQI, is what defines the job adequate? Remember, there are two criteria for being recognized as a PCQI. Let’s examine these two criteria. 

In 21 CFR Part 117.180 (c )(1), it states: “Job experience may qualify an individual to perform these functions if such experience has provided an individual with knowledge at least equivalent to that provided through the standardized curriculum.”

There are many persons in the industry who have the experience to do this task. However, I have found that most food processors have had their people attend and successfully complete a program on the development and application of risk-based preventive controls. The advantage of having experienced people be PCQIs is that they understand their limitations and know people in the industry who would have the necessary expertise to fill in-house gaps.

Now, the real issue is with some persons who are PCQIs because they have met the following criteria:

“A qualified individual who has successfully completed training in the development and application of risk-based preventive controls at least equivalent to that received under a standardized curriculum recognized as adequate by FDA.”

The concern with this route to becoming a PCQI is that there are no prerequisites for taking the class, nor is there any kind of screening of potential students. With my work in the industry, working with some companies and their PCQIs is a bit frightening. I will ask questions about their background, where they took the class and their industry experience. I get answers such as:

“I was a fine arts or English major.”

“I never took a HACCP class but took the PCQI program on the internet.”

“I am new to the food industry.” How new? “Two months.”  

All I can do when I meet such persons and work with such companies is encourage them to focus more on education and training and try to bring more experienced persons on board. But I cannot say that I am very comfortable when I walk out the door.

In other words, is a 20-hour program over 2½ days that will now define a PCQI enough to allow you to sleep well at night as an owner or operator?

I suspect that the FDA had hoped that the PCQI would not only be able to complete the necessary training on the development and application of risk-based preventive controls, but also would have the necessary expertise based on knowledge, experience and training to be the food safety expert and process authority that the position demands. Unfortunately, this is not the case with all food processors. 

Hopefully, the small number of processors with PCQIs who do not have the broad-based industry experience that others might have will not have food safety problems.

Companies that are in such a position would be wise to invest in further education and training for their PCQIs. Emphasize HACCP, sanitation, the Better Process Control School and a thermal processing workshop and have them attend a class where they can interact with others.

Don’t rely on distance learning. How the FDA will address companies that have less-qualified PCQIs remains to be seen.

This article was originally posted on www.foodengineeringmag.com.
KEYWORDS: GMPs/ HACCP/ SSOPs preventive controls regulations staffing

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Richard stier 200px
Richard F. Stier, M.S. is a consulting food scientist who has helped food processors develop safety, quality and sanitation programs. He believes in emphasizing the importance of how these programs can help companies increase profits. Stier holds degrees in food science from Rutgers University and the University of California at Davis. He is also a member of the Editorial Advisory Board of Food Safety Magazine.


Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Testing & Analysis
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Management
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    International
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to eNewsletter
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • mold
    Sponsored byIFC

    Tackling Mold Remediation in Food Processing Plants

  • a worker in a food processing plant
    Sponsored byLPS® DETEX®

    How a Beverage Facility Improved Food Safety and Compliance with Detectable Packaging Solutions

  • Two men standing in a produce storage facility having a discussion.
    Sponsored byOrkin Commercial

    Staying Compliant With FSMA

Popular Stories

carton of dozen brown eggs

Salmonella Outbreak Linked to Eggs Ends With One Dead, 38 Hospitalized

close-up macaroni noodles with FDA logo overlay

FDA to Revoke 52 ‘Obsolete and Unnecessary’ Standards of Identity for Food Products

blue iced donuts next to pie of sugar with blue written in it

FDA Authorizes Use of Fourth ‘Natural’ Food Dye, Gardenia Blue

Events

July 22, 2025

Beyond the Binder: Digital Management of Food Safety

Live: July 22, 2025 at 3:00 pm EDT: During this webinar, attendees will learn best practices for the use of digital food safety management systems across industry and regulatory agencies.

August 7, 2025

Achieve Active Managerial Control of Major Risk Factors Using a Food Safety Management System

Live: August 7, 2025 at 2:00 pm EDT: From this webinar, attendees will learn about changes to the FDA Food Code, which now includes a requirement for FSMS. 

August 28, 2025

Strategies for Rodent Control in Distribution Facilities

Live: August 28, 2025 at 2:00 pm EDT: From this webinar, attendees will learn how to understand rodent behavior and innovative strategies for rodent management.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products
Environmental Monitoring Excellence eBook

Related Articles

  • boxes floating in water in flooded warehouse

    Crisis Management: Are You Ready?

    See More
  • water management in food facility

    Water System Management for Food Processors

    See More
  • packaging robots

    How Processors Can Use Robots to Enhance Food Quality and Safety

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • shelf life.jpg

    Shelf Life and Food Safety

  • 1119258073.jpg

    FSMA and Food Safety Systems: Understanding and Implementing the Rules

  • food-safety-making.jpg

    Food Safety: Making Foods Safe and Free From Pathogens

See More Products

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • May 15, 2025

    Alarm Fatigue: How to Ensure Out-of-Compliance Alarms Serve Their Purpose and Ensure Food Safety

    On Demand: This session will explore the challenges of setting effective alarms for out-of-compliance hot and cold holding temperatures in food safety management. 
View AllSubmit An Event

Related Directories

  • Responsible Training

    Responsible Training has been a trusted leader in compliance education since 1999, providing accessible and reliable training solutions for businesses across highly regulated industries. With deep local expertise in Texas and a nationwide reach, we specialize in helping kitchens across industries get tailored, regulation-focused content that ensures businesses seamlessly meet their compliance requirements. Contact us for more information about our Food Manager Certification, Food Handler Courses, Alcohol Server and Cannabis Vendor courses.
  • National Environmental Health Assn. (NEHA)

    We support over 7,000 environmental health professionals globally, offering top-tier credentialing, educational materials, and events. Our FSMA courses include PCQI, FSVP, and IAVA. We employ experts to ensure the highest standards in practice and testing, fostering career growth and networking through our community and peer-reviewed journal. https://www.neha.org/FSPCA-PCQI-training.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

eNewsletter | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing