Food Safety
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • ENEWSLETTER >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
RegulatoryFDAGuidelinesInspectionUSDA

More Guidance and More Questions: Initial Oversight of Animal Cell Culture Technology

March 19, 2019

On March 7, 2019, as promised and on time, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued an agreement describing in some detail the division of responsibility between the two agencies over the emerging and much-talked-about category of human food produced using cell culture technology derived from cell lines of USDA-amenable species of meat and poultry.[1] The document contains no real surprises and, as is often the case with such materials, tends to raise as many questions as it answers. Nonetheless, it provides the clearest delineation to date on the particulars of just how the safety, suitability and marketing of such products is to be overseen by the two agencies.

At the outset, it may be useful to start with some basics. While FDA at the federal level maintains jurisdiction over the safety and labeling of most food products,[2] primary jurisdiction over meat and poultry falls to USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).[3] There are fundamental differences between the two systems of oversight, the most significant being that FSIS is required to maintain a continuous, day-to-day presence in meat and poultry production facilities,[4] while no such requirement applies to FDA-regulated foods. The issue of agency jurisdiction for the emerging cell culture industry thereby hinges upon whether the products in question can be said to conform with those established definitions of meat, poultry, and other related terms, as overseen by FSIS.

Controversy surrounding such questions broke the surface this past summer when FDA took steps, including the initiation of a public meeting, to assert itself in this area with a limited reference to any role for FSIS.[5] Ensuing pushback, rooted in the livestock in meat and poultry processing industries, began moving the issue in a different direction, and, after additional public meetings, comment and passage of the recent Farm Bill, the process leading to the March 7 publication took shape. As the March 7 document indicates, the agencies have set forth their shared commitment to ongoing cooperation, to provide for comprehensive and coordinated oversight, and for a joint process to identify any changes needed to statutory or regulatory authority.

To properly assess the March 7 document, it may be useful to separate pending issues into three separate areas: 1) premarket review (how such products are to be evaluated before being allowed to move into production for human food purposes); 2) ongoing oversight (supervision of actual food-processing operations); and 3) marketing (how the product is to be labeled and advertised in commerce).

Premarket Review
Under the agreement, FDA takes the lead in this area. The agreement specifies that FDA will be responsible for conducting a premarket consultation process to evaluate production materials and processes in manufacturing controls, including the oversight of tissue collection, cell lines and banks, and all components and inputs. Further, FDA will oversee proliferation and differentiation of cells through the time of harvest. Within this area, it reserves the right to conduct appropriate inspections and follow-up activities, initiate enforcement actions, and provide addition regulation and guidance as appropriate. Finally, at harvest, FDA will be responsible for coordinating transfer of oversight to FSIS, including providing information necessary for USDA to determine whether such materials are eligible to be processed into meat or poultry products.

Inspection Oversight
Once this transfer has occurred, USDA takes over and presumably incorporates the oversight of production of these foods into its established inspection system. As noted above, this entails the requirement of continuous inspection, as overseen by the daily presence of a federal inspector, as well as the establishment and application of an effective Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) program. Products that successfully move through such systems are to be eligible for the USDA mark of inspection identical to that being applied today to traditional meat and poultry products available in the marketplace. Note, however, that this regime will not be applicable to all cell-cultured protein products. With limited exception, all seafood products remain under FDA jurisdiction, which mandates its own HACCP requirement but does not require or provide continuous inspection.

Labeling
Last, but by no means least, FSIS commits itself in the document to develop, as needed, additional requirements to ensure the accurate labeling of the human food products derived from the cultured cells of livestock and poultry.

Where Things Stand
Premarket Issues
While the initial clarification of FDA’s premarket gatekeeper role is welcomed and not surprising, it opens the door to another layer of specific, yet-to-be answered questions. A few would be: What is the specific nature of the premarket evaluation process? What will be the time line for any review? Will FDA be issuing any sort of affirmative sanction of such product as opposed to the absence of any objections? Will any type of acceptance, either through an active or passive process, be attached to a particular production facility, a particular class of product, or some other distinction? Will new regulations need to be promulgated before any of this takes place?

In prior discussions, FDA has pointed to existing procedures such as the Generally Recognized as Safe notification program, food contact notification procedures, and new technology guidelines as points of reference, while also suggesting that a new process, focusing upon variables unique to this industry, needs to be crafted.[5]

Inspection Oversight Issues
Once the transfer of eligible cell material has occurred and what is deemed to be meat and poultry processing begins, the FSIS inspection will presumably apply to all forms of further food processing of these materials. The constants in this equation thus include continuous inspection and mandatory HACCP. But there are clearly underlying complications and nuances. It is noteworthy, for example, that FDA’s statement of responsibilities includes providing FSIS with information necessary to determine whether harvested materials are eligible to be processed into the meat and poultry products. This suggests the need for some affirmative endorsement of safety by the agency, which is something FDA does not typically do. It also bears mention that all meat and poultry items for further processing subject to FSIS inspection must be derived from the carcasses of animals that have also been subject to both pre- and antemortem inspection by that same agency. If, when, and how this particular issue is to be addressed in the cell cultured arena raises, and by no means answers, its own set of scientific and legal riddles.

Labeling Issues
What has probably engendered the most debate in this area are questions about how these products are to be identified and labeled within the marketplace, more specifically, whether they can maintain access to the traditional terminology (i.e., “ground beef” or “sliced turkey”) applied to such products, as well as whether they should be further differentiated in some other fashion. At one extreme, some proponents of the new technology have asserted that the finished product itself will ultimately have characteristics identical to traditional items and thus can be identically labeled. At the other extreme, it is argued that traditional meat and poultry items are apples, and cell cultured products are oranges, and they need to be fully differentiated as such.

Another underlying question is whether, independent of any determinations by FSIS on such question, different policies will be advanced at the state level. As has been widely reported, there has been a spate of recent legislative activity centered in states with significant local livestock industries, advancing the view that such traditional terminology should only be applicable to products derived from the carcasses of live animals. While activity will doubtlessly continue, it appears directly contrary to the clear federal preemption that attaches to the labeling of any meat and poultry products under FSIS jurisdiction. Once again, seafood products are a bit of a wildcard in this area, since they do not enjoy the benefits of such clear statutory protection.

Conclusion
Issuance of the March 7 document is a useful and valuable step forward on this issue. It commits both agencies to a cooperative approach to these issues, drawing upon their respective areas of expertise and jurisdiction. As this article indicates, however, a host of additional details must be resolved prior to the marketing of this much-discussed new category of food products.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP partner Robert Hibbert, Esq., and associate Amaru Sanchez, Esq., advise clients in the food and agricultural industries on federal regulation. This article is provided as a general informational service and should not be construed as imparting legal advice on any specific matter.

References
1. www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm632916.htm?utm_campaign=030719_PR_Formal%20Agreement%20to%20Regulate%20Cell-Cultured%20Food%20Products&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua.
2. 21 U.S.C. Chapter 9, Subchapter IV.
3. www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/informational/aboutfsis.
4. 21 U.S.C. §§ 455, 602-606.
5. www.fda.gov/Food/NewsEvents/WorkshopsMeetingsConferences/ucm610138.htm.


Author(s): Robert Hibbert and Amaru Sanchez

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Testing & Analysis
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Personal Hygiene/Handwashing
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    International
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to eNewsletter
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Two men standing in a produce storage facility having a discussion.
    Sponsored byOrkin Commercial

    Staying Compliant With FSMA

  • Deli Salads
    Sponsored byCorbion

    How Food Safety is Becoming the Ultimate Differentiator in Refrigerated and Prepared Foods

Popular Stories

Corporate manager talking with factory employees

Turning Resistance into Opportunity: Motivating Change in the Food Industry

Image of executive signing legislation into law

Texas Governor Abbott Signs MAHA-Similar Bill into Law

Microphone in a conference room used for receiving public comment

FDA Seeks Input on New Method for Ranking Chemicals in Food for Post-Market Assessments

Events

June 26, 2025

How to Design and Conduct Challenge Studies for Safer Products and Longer Shelf Life

Live: June 26, 2025 at 2:00 pm EDT: During this webinar, attendees will learn how to conduct challenge studies for microbial spoilage and pathogen growth, including the common challenges encountered, laboratory selection, and use of predictive models.

July 15, 2025

Hygienic Design Risk Management: Industry Challenges and EHEDG Guidance

Live: July 15, 2025 at 11:00 am EDT: From this webinar, attendees will learn the importance of hygienic design to ensure food safety and sanitation effectiveness.

July 22, 2025

Beyond the Binder: Digital Management of Food Safety

Live: July 22, 2025 at 3:00 pm EDT: During this webinar, attendees will learn best practices for the use of digital food safety management systems across industry and regulatory agencies.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products
Environmental Monitoring Excellence eBook

Related Articles

  • Animal Cell-Culture Food Technology: A New Regulatory Frontier

    See More
  • scrabble tiles spelling vegan on a blue plate

    More Than Half of UK Consumers Allergic to Animal-Derived Foods Believe “Vegan” Label Indicates Safety

    See More
  • cell-based hotdogs

    FSA: More Data Required to Determine Safety of Cultured Meats

    See More

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • July 25, 2024

    How Rapid Development of Technology Has Revolutionized Food Safety

    On Demand: In this webinar, you will hear from leading technology and policy experts from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), food safety laboratories, and food processors, who will discuss these technological advances and how you can use them to benefit your food safety program.
View AllSubmit An Event

Related Directories

  • Fortress Technology Inc.

    Fortress Technology custom manufactures inspection equipment to achieve optimal detection with a high ROI. Our precision solutions are used worldwide, with manufacturing offices in Canada, the UK, Brazil and New Zealand serving global distributors.
  • MULTIVAC Inc.

    Established in 1987, MULTIVAC has more than 4,250 active US-based packaging machines and a growth of 300+ new machines sold annually. As a single-source supply network for packaging equipment, our customers rely on the vast expertise of our global manufacturing and the local support from our Kansas City headquarters.
  • Rootwurks

    Rootwurks is an e-learning and risk management company built by a team of experts with more than 100 years of combined knowledge and experience in compliance and safety training. After many years spent in senior roles at one of the largest food safety training companies in the country, our founders launched Rootwurks and built the Rootwurks Learning Experience Platform (LXP) to help companies navigate the complex and crucial safety and compliance demands in industries as varied and challenging as cannabis and food.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

eNewsletter | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing