Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin instagram youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Sponsored White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • NEWSLETTERS >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
Testing & AnalysisMethodsMicrobiological Testing & Analysis

With Pathogen Detection, One Plus One Does Not Always Equal Two

August 1, 2007

On Feb. 28, 1953 Francis Crick and James Watson announced that they had discovered the basic double helix structure of DNA, a discovery which continues to shape the world around us. One colleague referred to this monumental event as “that marvelous resonance between two minds—that high state in which 1 plus 1 does not equal 2 but more like 10.” It is discoveries like these that revolutionize our world.

Within the world of pathogen detection, the combining of two different technologies such as immunomagnetic separation (IMS) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to create a single method has proven to be a very promising new approach. BioControl has contributed to this approach a new example of one plus one equaling 10 with Assurance GDS, a groundbreaking new pathogen detection system which uses a novel IMS method and takes advantage of the latest developments in molecular technology to deliver an unprecedented level of accuracy and speed.

IMS is the use of paramagnetic particles coated with specific antibodies to capture and separate cells containing the target antigen from the surrounding environment (sample). This technique has been widely used by microbiologists to aide in the isolation and recovery of low levels of pathogenic organisms from problematic sample matrices and high background microflora environments. It can provide additional advantages when utilized in preparation of samples for PCR-based path-ogen detection. However, not all IMS procedures are equally effective.

Conventional IMS procedures require the application of an external magnet to the outside of a thin wall tube to draw the particles through the liquid. The magnet holds the particles in place against the tube wall, the supernatant is removed, and a series of wash solutions are administered. Finally, the magnet is removed, allowing the particles to be collected and transferred for analysis.

In contrast to conventional IMS procedures, Assurance GDS™ utilizes a novel intrasolution IMS method to prepare samples for analysis via PCR. In this method, the sample aliquot and particles are combined in a deep well plate. The magnetic tips of the Assurance GDS PickPen™ device are inserted directly into the wells to collect the particles and transfer them through a wash solution into a resuspension buffer. Once deposited in the buffer, the particles and the associated captured organisms are ready for analysis with the Assurance GDS system.

Researchers at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Meat Animal Research Center recently compared the effectiveness of the PickPen and conventional IMS procedures for recovery and detection of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella.[1] They concluded that conventional IMS was labor intensive and not amenable to high sample throughput. The stationary nature of the external magnet did not appear to sufficiently hold particles during wash steps leading to variability in bead recovery from the samples and the carryover of high amounts of non-target background microflora. In contrast, the intrasolution collection of particles using the PickPen produced more consistent bead recovery and significantly less carryover of background microflora. Additionally, the PickPen’s 8-channel design and ease of use made it ideal for high volume throughput, increasing the procedure’s speed without compromising sensitivity.

PickPen IMS Plus PCR
When paired with the powerful analytical capabilities of PCR the PickPen IMS technology produces a variety of additional advantages. A common approach to preventing PCR inhibition caused by certain sample matrices and enrichment media involves diluting a very small portion of the enriched sample. Unfortunately, this process also dilutes the amount of target pathogen DNA provided to the PCR reaction, requiring longer enrichment times to allow sufficient bacterial growth to compensate for this decrease in sensitivity.

In contrast, the Assurance GDS procedure removes PCR inhibitors while selectively increasing the quantity of target DNA provided to the PCR reaction. The PickPen captures the particles and physically removes them from the sample enrichment reducing the impact of potential inhibitors. Additionally, this procedure concentrates the target pathogen onto the particles allowing for the analysis of a much larger test portion than dilution protocols (1,000 µL vs. 5 µL). The combined effect of the increased sample volume and concentrated DNA results in easy single-step enrichment protocols requiring as few as 6 hours. The Assurance GDS protocol generates a high purity sample with minimal background microflora and potential PCR inhibitors without compromising sensitivity.
The benefits of PickPen IMS combined with the dual specificity of the Assurance GDS DNA primers and probes, and the innovative rotary format thermocycler result in a pathogen detection system that offers unparallel speed and accuracy. Assurance GDS is currently used in a variety of industrial and commercial testing labs for the detection of E. coli O157:H7; Shiga toxin genes; Salmonella; Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes.

www.biocontrolsys.com

References
1. Nou, X., et al (2006). Improvement of immunomagnetic separation for Escherichia coli O157:H7 detection by the PickPen Magnetic Particle Separation Device. J. Food Prot., 69(12), 2870-2874.

>
Author(s): BioControl Systems

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

Share This Story

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Microbiological Control
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Training
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Best Practices
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to Newsletters
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Darkling Beetle
    Sponsored byElanco Animal Health

    Integrated Pest Management: Protecting Poultry Operations as Seasons Change

  • NEVIFIT 3 Compartment BPA-FREE
    Sponsored byCorbion

    The Risks of Ready-to-Eat: Five Ways to Protect Today's Prepared Meals

  • a group of workers in a food production facility
    Sponsored bySkillUp by Registrar Corp

    How to Build a Better Training Program: Data and Insights from the Global Food Safety Training Survey

Popular Stories

half full baby bottle next to rubber duckie on white surface

Organic Infant Formulas Caused Back-to-Back Botulism Outbreaks—What Gives?

June26 eBook Cover

eBook | Building a Skilled and Capable Workforce in the Food Industry

alfalfa sprouted seeds

Salmonella-Tainted Alfalfa Sprouts Sicken 109 People in 11 European Countries, One Death Reported

building a skilled workforce ebook

Events

June 30, 2026

FSMA 204 in Practice: Building a Traceability-Ready Operation

Live: June 30, 2026 at 11:00 am EDT: Attend this webinar to learn how food businesses can move from fragmented records toward a more reliable approach for recall response, FDA requests, and supply chain visibility.

July 21, 2026

Using AI Responsibly in Food Safety Management Systems

Live: July 21, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: This webinar will provide participants with guidance on how to effectively use generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools to develop key components of a food safety management system (FSMS).

August 6, 2026

Beyond Sanitation: Understanding the Hidden System Conditions That Allow Pathogens to Persist

Live: August 6, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Attend this webinar to learn strategies for strengthening environmental control programs through a layered approach to pathogen management.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • refracted light

    Light-Based Pathogen Detection Method Can Give Results for Multiple Pathogens in One Hour

    See More
  • parfait in plastic cup with plastic fork

    FDA: Limited Scientific Evidence Does Not Show Microplastics in Food, Packaging Pose Health Risk

    See More
  • hemp field

    USDA Scientists Determine that Feeding Hempseed Cakes to Cattle Does Not Pose Food Safety Risk

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 1444333348.jpg

    Handbook of Food Safety Engineering

  • global food.jpg

    Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

  • 1119160553.jpg

    Food Safety: Innovative Analytical Tools for Safety Assessment

See More Products

Related Directories

  • On Target Packaging

    On Target Packaging is a production/maintenance servicer for combination and check weighers. We do not sell or process food, but provide service/repairs, and equipment for the food industry
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing