Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin instagram youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • Sponsored Insights
    • Sponsored White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • MORE
    • BUYER'S GUIDE
    • NEWSLETTERS >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • FSM FEATURES
    • FSM Features Collection
    • eMag Archives
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
NewsContamination ControlFood TypeRegulatoryChemical ControlProduceUSDA

USDA Reports 99 Percent of Foods Tested in 2024 Complied with Pesticide Residue Tolerances

By Food Safety Magazine Editorial Team
many different fruit and veg
Image credit: KamranAydinov via Freepik
December 31, 2025

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has published its Pesticide Data Program (PDP) Annual Summary for 2024.

As in years past, more than 99 percent of foods sampled through PDP were compliant with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pesticide maximum residue limits (MRLs).

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (USDA-AMS) carries out PDP sampling and testing each year to provide nationally representative data about pesticides in U.S. food. A variety of imported and domestic foods that are highly consumed by the U.S. population are included in PDP, with a strong focus on foods that are consumed by infants and children. Food types sampled in PDP are cycled through every five years, with specialized commodities (e.g., fresh herbs) added to the rotation as data are needed.

PDP is a voluntary program and is not designed for enforcement of tolerances. However, if pesticide residues detected on a food exceed EPA MRLs, or if residues are detected that have no EPA tolerance established, PDP informs the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and EPA of presumptive tolerance violations (PTVs) if detected residues exceed the EPA tolerance. FDA is responsible for ensuring that food in interstate commerce is compliant with EPA pesticide MRLs. Additionally, EPA considers PDP data in setting and reviewing pesticide tolerances. USDA also uses PDP data to support U.S. growers.

Samples Collected in 2024

Sampling services were conducted by nine participating states in 2024, representing nearly 50 percent of the U.S. population: California, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Texas, and Washington.

A total of 9,165 samples were collected in 2024, including:

  • Fresh and processed fruit and vegetables: 9,165 samples (92.8 percent of all samples), including apples, avocados, blackberries (fresh and frozen), cherry tomatoes, cucumbers, head lettuce, leaf lettuce, onions, oranges, pineapples (fresh and frozen), potatoes, canned pumpkin, sweet corn (fresh and frozen), and tomatillos
  • Almonds: 531 samples (5.1 percent)
  • Salmon: 176 samples (1.8 percent).

The origin of samples was 60.1 percent domestic, 38.9 percent imported, 0.9 percent unknown, and 0.1 percent mixed national origin.

Number of Samples with No Detectable Pesticides Continue to Rise

More than 99 percent of PDP samples in 2024 fell below EPA MRLs for pesticides.

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

Additionally, 42.3 percent of samples had no detectable pesticide residues—an increase over 2023 (38.8 percent) and 2022 (27.6 percent).

Of the samples that contained detectable pesticides, 17.9 percent contained one pesticide, and 38 percent contained more than one pesticide. Notably, a single cucumber sample contained 17 pesticides, albeit at levels compliant with EPA MRLs.

A total of 379 samples containing 463 pesticides were reported as PTVs to FDA for exceeding EPA MRLs or for containing pesticides with no established tolerance. Of these, 76 samples (0.77 percent of total samples) contained pesticides exceeding MRLs; 12 and 63 of these samples were domestic and imported, respectively.

The samples containing pesticides exceeding EPA tolerances included:

  • One sample of avocados
  • 22 samples of fresh blackberries
  • Eight samples of cherry tomatoes
  • Five samples of cucumbers
  • Three samples of fresh sweet corn
  • 37 samples of tomatillos.

Residues with no established tolerance were detected in 361 samples (3.7 percent), of which 118 were domestic (32.7 percent) and 230 were imported (63.7 percent).

Conversely, commodities that did not have any samples with pesticides exceeding EPA tolerances included: almonds, apples, canned pumpkin, frozen blackberries, fresh/frozen pineapples, frozen sweet corn, head lettuce, leaf lettuce, onion, orange, potatoes, and salmon. Commodities that did not have any samples with pesticides for which no tolerance was established were frozen sweet corn, oranges, potatoes, and salmon.

Persistent Organic Pollutants Still Found in Samples

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are environmental contaminants that are no longer allowed to be used in the U.S. but persist in the environment and therefore may be taken up by crops.

DDT (and its isomers/metabolites), which has been banned in the U.S. since 1972, were detected at low levels in: leaf lettuce (16.2 percent of samples), potatoes (2.3 percent), salmon (1.7 percent), fresh sweet corn (0.7 percent), cucumbers (0.3 percent), and avocadoes (0.3 percent). All residues detected were lower than established FDA action levels.

Trace levels of chlordane, eldrin, and heptachlor epoxide were also detected in some of the tested commodities, despite being banned since the 1970s and 1980s.

Chlordane (cis) was detected in 2.3 percent of canned pumpkin samples and 0.3 percent of cucumber samples. Chlordane (trans) was detected in 0.1 percent of cucumbers.

Dieldrin was detected in 0.1 percent of apple samples, 15.9 percent of canned pumpkin samples, and 1.4 percent of cucumber samples.

Heptachlor epoxide was detected in 3.5 percent of canned pumpkin samples and 0.1 percent of cucumber samples.

No residues of aldrin, BHC (alpha/beta/delta/epsilon), endrin, heptachlor, HCB, lindane (BHC gamma), or mirex were detected in any samples.

KEYWORDS: persistant organic pollutants Pesticide Data Program (PDP) pesticide residues report

Share This Story

Fsm purple logo 200x200

The Food Safety Magazine editorial team comprises Bailee Henderson, Director of Content Strategy and news editor ✉, and Adrienne Blume, M.A., Director of Editorial and Industry Engagement.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Methods
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Food Prep/Handling
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Best Practices
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to Newsletters
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Top view portrait of two factory workers standing by conveyor belt during quality inspection at food production, copy space
    Sponsored byFlexXray

    Foreign Material By the Numbers: What the 2026 Benchmark Report Reveals

  • a conveyorized industrial metal detector system that appears to resemble a Loma Systems IQ4 Metal Detector setup with an integrated conveyor belt and control panel for food or package inspection.
    Sponsored byMettler Toledo

    Beyond Detection: How to Avoid Physical Contamination in Food Through a Smarter Inspection Strategy

  • The image displays a bottling plant production line, commonly used in the beverage industry for filling and packaging soft drinks.
    Sponsored byBIOIONIX

    Sustainability with ROI: A Beverage Producer Case Study in Water Savings

Popular Stories

Dr. Heidi Overton speaking at Senate hearing

In Senate Hearing, FDA Commissioner Nominee Says Lack of Resources Will Challenge GRAS Reform

rangpur lime

Pathogens Found on Brazilian Citrus Fruit Present Emerging Food Safety Concerns

lightbulb on a plate next to fork and knife representing food innovation ideas

EFSA Outlines Scientific Needs for Regulatory Preparedness, Risk Assessment

allergens ebook

Events

October 6, 2026

Advances in Environmental Monitoring Science and Strategy

Live: October 6, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: This webinar will cover how environmental monitoring science and EMP strategies support sanitation verification and the safe production of food.

October 15, 2026

How to Prevent Physical Contamination in Food Production and Strengthen Compliance

Live: October 15, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Attend this webinar to gain insight into how product inspection helps protect your brand, reduce recall risk, and support compliance.

October 29, 2026

FDA Proposes Major GRAS Reform: What It Could Mean for Your Business

Live: October 29, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Attend this webinar to examine potential implications for self-GRAS, Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) GRAS, and food-contact substances.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • crops being sprayed

    USDA Testing for 2023 Shows 99 Percent of Foods Do Not Exceed Pesticide Residue Tolerances

    See More
  • cod dinner with rice and beans. fda logo overlay

    FDA: No PFAS Detected in More Than 97 Percent of Foods Tested in Total Diet Study to Date

    See More
  • Agricultural Pesticide Spraying

    USDA Releases Annual Pesticide Residue Report, Finds 99 Percent of Samples Below Benchmarks

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • food-safety-making.jpg

    Food Safety: Making Foods Safe and Free From Pathogens

  • 9781498721776.jpg

    Handbook of Food Processing: Food Safety, Quality, and Manufacturing Processes

  • 1119237963.jpg

    Food Safety in China: Science, Technology, Management and Regulation

See More Products

Related Directories

  • North American Chemical Residue Workshop

    NACRW) formerly the Florida Pesticide Residue Workshop conducts an annual meeting for scientists particularly interested in trace level analysis of pesticides, veterinary drug residues, and other chemicals in food, animal feed, and environmental samples. The purpose of the meeting is to provide training, develop and improve technical knowledge, facilitate development and distribution of new analysis methods and techniques, and establish networking to promote professional cooperation between scientists of these interests.
  • Women In Food Safety

    Women in Food Safety is a US-based global nonprofit organization dedicated to empowering and advancing women in the food safety and quality industry. Women In Food Safety provides a platform for professionals at all stages of their careers to grow, share knowledge, and support one another. Through community events, educational initiatives, and leadership development, we are building a more inclusive and resilient future for food safety worldwide. Together, we can do BETTER!
  • Schneider Food Safety Services

    We are a boutique regulatory (FDA/USDA) consulting firm, and we support companies with FSMA 204 traceability compliance and other regulated processes.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

Newsletters | Website | FSM Features Collection

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing