Food Safety
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • ENEWSLETTER >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
NewsContamination ControlFood TypeManagementInternationalChemicalIngredients

WHO Confirms Aspartame as Possible Carcinogen, but Acceptable Daily Intake Remains Unchanged

However, FDA and industry groups disagree with WHO's determination.

bottle cap that says "diet cherry soda: artificial sweetener and flavoring"

Image credit: Lance Reis via Unsplash

July 14, 2023

The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO’s IARC) has officially declared popular artificial sweetener aspartame as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” based on limited evidence. At the same time, the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 40 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of body weight remains unchanged, having been reaffirmed by the Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA).

Meanwhile, not all officials agree with IARC's determination; specifically, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expressed its dissent. Industry groups have also shared their disapproval with the conclusion. 

IARC and JECFA conducted independent but complementary reviews to assess the potential carcinogenic hazard and other health risks associated with aspartame consumption. The present evaluation represented the first time that IARC has evaluated aspartame and the third time for JECFA. After reviewing the available scientific literature, both evaluations noted limitations in the available evidence for cancer, among other health effects.

IARC classified aspartame as possibly carcinogenic to humans—Group 2B—on the basis of limited evidence for cancer in humans; specifically, for hepatocellular carcinoma, which is a type of liver cancer. There was also limited evidence for cancer in experimental animals and limited evidence related to the possible mechanisms for causing cancer.

However, JECFA concluded that, based on available data, there is no sufficient reason to change the previously established ADI of 0–40 mg/kg body weight for aspartame. The committee reaffirmed that it is safe for a person to consume aspartame within the ADI. For reference, an adult weighing 70 kg would need to consume more than 9–14 cans of diet soda containing 200–300 mg of aspartame per day to exceed the ADI, assuming no additional intake of the chemical from other food sources.

IARC classifications reflect the strength of scientific evidence as to whether an agent can cause cancer in humans, but they do not reflect the risk of developing cancer at a given exposure level. The strength of evidence classification in Group 2B is the third highest out of four levels, and it is generally applied either when there is limited, but not convincing, evidence for cancer in humans or convincing evidence for cancer in experimental animals, but not both.

Both IARC and JECFA believe further research is required to increase understanding of the carcinogenicity of aspartame, including higher-quality studies with longer follow-up and repeated dietary questionnaires in existing cohorts. JECFA calls for randomized controlled trials, including studies of mechanistic pathways relevant to insulin regulation, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes, with relation to carcinogenicity.

IARC and WHO will continue to monitor new evidence and encourage independent research groups to develop further studies on the potential association between aspartame exposure and consumer health effects.

FDA Disagrees With IARC's Determination

However, not all regulatory bodies are in agreement with IARC. FDA released a statement after IARC's announcement expressing its dissent. The agency stated that "...aspartame being labeled by IARC as 'possibly carcinogenic to humans' does not mean that aspartame is actually linked to cancer." 

According to the agency, FDA scientists reviewed the scientific information included in IARC’s review in 2021 when it was first made available and identified significant shortcomings in the studies on which IARC relied. FDA argued that "...aspartame is one of the most studied food additives in the human food supply," and stated that agency scientists do not have safety concerns when aspartame is used under the approved conditions. The agency also pointed to aspartame's approval for use by Health Canada and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

Specifically, FDA disagrees with IARC's conclusion based on its evaluation of the same studies that IARC relied on to support its findings. The agency identified "significant shortcomings" in the design, conduct, reporting, and interpretation of the animal study used to support the IARC’s conclusion, and found that the reliability and interpretation of the study outcome was compromised by its shortcomings and uncontrolled variables, such as the presence of infection in the test animals. FDA shared that it has reviewed other studies that do not show evidence of carcinogenicity for aspartame.

Additionally, FDA explained that, in August 2022, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services sent a letter to WHO on behalf of the nation that outlined concerns with WHO and JECFA's review of aspartame. The letter recommended that JECFA was better suited to conduct the review because of its expertise in reviewing food additives, among other reasons. FDA notes that IARC conducted a hazard assessment for aspartame, which is different from JECFA’s risk assessment of the chemical’s current levels of use. For example, IARC does not factor dosage or route of exposure into its classifications, which are variables that help assess health risk.  

Industry Groups Unhappy With Conclusion

Industry groups have also shared their disagreement with IARC's determination. For example, the American Beverage Association stated simply, "Aspartame is safe." The association pointed to 40 years of science and regulatory approval by more than 90 food safety authorities around the world supporting the acceptability of aspartame for human consumption. 

The Calorie Control Council also explained why it disagrees with IARC in a statement. The group argued that "IARC is not a regulatory agency or food safety authority. IARC looks for substances that could potentially cause cancer without considering actual dietary intake." To support its statement, the council provided examples of other activities widely believed to be safe that have been classified as "possibly carcinogenic" by IARC. The group believes that the determination of aspartame as "possibly carcinogenic" is potentially damaging to individuals looking to reduce their sugar intake for weight control or due to conditions such as diabetes.


Update, July 14, 2023: The story has been edited to include the opinions laid out in FDA and industry statements.

KEYWORDS: aspartame Carcinogenicity FDA WHO

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Testing & Analysis
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Facilities
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Risk Assessment
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Subscribe For Free!
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to eNewsletter
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Deli Salads
    Sponsored byCorbion

    How Food Safety is Becoming the Ultimate Differentiator in Refrigerated and Prepared Foods

Popular Stories

Image of Tyson Foods logo and the logos of Tyson Foods brands

Tyson Foods is Reformulating Food Products to Eliminate Petroleum-Based Synthetic Dyes

Top view of several sandwiches

FDA Provides Update on Listeria Outbreak Related to Products of Fresh & Ready Foods LLC

Image of container spilling red powder

FDA Approves Three Food Colors from Natural Sources

Events

June 12, 2025

Additive Bans Ahead: Your Guide to Avoiding Risk and Maintaining Agility

Live: June 12, 2025 at 12:00 pm EDT: From this webinar, attendees will learn how ingredient bans will impact product development, labeling, and sourcing.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products
Environmental Monitoring Excellence eBook

Related Articles

  • sweetener in a spoon

    WHO Set to Declare Aspartame as Possible Carcinogen

    See More
  • spoonful of sweetener

    EFSA Lowers Acceptable Daily Intake for Sweetener Erythritol, Which Most People Exceed

    See More
  • copper pot

    EFSA Sets Acceptable Daily Intake for Copper, Says EU Population is Not at Risk

    See More

Related Directories

  • Log 10 LLC

    Our core science is food microbiology, and our name reflects the way microbe numbers are expressed. Our mission is to provide professional consulting, research, testing, and training support to the food industry relative to the manufacture and delivery of safe, high-quality food products.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

eNewsletter | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing