Food Safety
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • ENEWSLETTER >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
SanitationSanitation

Controlling Sanitizer Concentration in Water

By Eric Wilhelmsen Ph.D., CFS
Controlling Sanitizer Concentration in Water

Getty images/E+/ThePalmer

March 1, 2022

Sanitizer level control is required in many systems where sanitizers are used to control microbiological growth, avoid cross-contamination, or sanitize as part of a HACCP plan. These systems include dump tanks, water conveyors, wash systems with flumes or float tanks, and some spray systems where water is recycled. Chlorine is the most common sanitizer and the one with the most developed control. As such, chlorine is frequently used in the following example; however, the concepts discussed here have application to other sanitizers, as well.  

The system requirement is the first question when considering control. The tighter the control window, the greater the required precision and accuracy. Controlling chlorine between 2 ppm and 5 ppm is much more challenging than controlling its level between 7 ppm and 15 ppm. Knowing the minimum acceptable level is an important input for assessing the ability of a monitoring system or other measurement system to control the wash chemistry. The minimum acceptable level is specific to each application.  

In considering the suitability of a sanitizer control system, monitoring the sanitizer level is fundamental. The suitability of monitoring devolves to managing three sources of error: 

  • Errors in calibration 
  • Errors in sampling (time and space)
  • Errors in the detection process. 

Control will never be better than the ability to monitor, but it can be worse. For brevity, this discussion will ignore the complexities associated with converting the knowledge of level to control. The ultimate accuracy of any control system is dependent on the ability to control or mitigate these three sources of error in monitoring. It is impossible to eliminate error, and uncertainty in monitoring will always remain. It is important to limit this uncertainty to achieve the desired level of control and achieve the intended fitness-for-purpose standard.  

Control of errors in calibration is linked to having standards of known quality and a validated calibration procedure. In many areas of science, high-quality reference materials can be purchased. Also, vendors can provide chlorine reference standards. These standards usually do a good to excellent job of covering total chlorine, but they can lack information on free chlorine or hypochlorous acid unless pH control is provided. These standards can be prepared and linked to high-quality reference materials, such as stable powdered oxidants, through classical analytical methods such as titration. In many cases, such as with chlorine, the reference material must be presented to the sensor or detection system in a way that mimics the actual use because the flow of the standard affects the observed concentration. This is a characteristic of coulombic sensors, where the analyte is consumed during the measurement. 

Membrane-covered sensors can have similar problems related to the diffusion of the analyte into and out of the sensor chamber. These concerns and others can be addressed by a validated calibration procedure. Such a procedure can also serve as a verification procedure to ensure that the system remains in calibration during operation.

Much of the calibration effort can be completed by the suppliers that deliver secondary standards or materials for monitoring. However, this should be handled as a "trust, but verify" activity. In the case of chlorine, many companies rely on diphenyldiamine (DPD) tests, which require the calibration of both the reagents and the spectrophotometer. These can be acceptable if they are validated as fit-for-purpose. These kits are usually intended for one-time measurements and generally lack the precision and accuracy needed to calibrate a continuous monitoring system. The manual procedure for DPD testing makes them highly subject to the next family of errors. 

The family of errors associated with sampling is more complex and includes both time and space parameters. Manual monitoring with DPD kits or similar systems for other sanitizers is often too slow for dynamic systems with variable sanitizer demand or inhomogeneity. This, again, brings up the fitness-for-purpose question that is specific to each application. Increasing the frequency of sampling is the best way to address variability. Manual procedures are generally too slow to provide useful monitoring of sanitizer concentration if the sanitizer is important to the safety of the food product. The fresh-cut produce industry is moving to continuous monitoring for this reason.  

The problem of inhomogeneity can be addressed by ensuring that the minimum level is present at all locations in the system. This knowledge can be obtained by measuring concentration at diverse locations and identifying the lowest location for future monitoring. These activities are critical to validating a control system as meeting the fitness-for-purpose objective. 

Errors in the detection process are the last area to address. The specificity and sensitivity of the detection process are critical. Interferences, stability, and reliability factor into the selection of the detection process. It can be tempting to use a surrogate measure when a suitable direct detection process does not exist. The use of Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) sensors to control chlorine is an example of this approach. Unfortunately, ORP rarely if ever meets the fitness-for-purpose requirements of chlorine measurement when validation is attempted. Validation of a detection process normally requires a so-called "Gold Standard" method—a procedure that is known to give an accurate and precise result. Gold Standard methods are generally not suitable for routine monitoring; however, they can be used with standard additions protocols to validate control of matrix effects. 

Whether one makes or buys a monitoring system, it is important to understand its capabilities and ensure fitness-for-purpose. A useful system will address all three sources of error. Without a validated monitoring system, it is not practical to control sanitizer concentration. Without control of sanitizer concentration, it is unrealistic to assert that the process is in control. Sanitizer effectiveness must be verified as an important preventive control in every HACCP plan.

 

 

KEYWORDS: HACCP sanitizers

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Eric wilhelmsen

Eric Wilhelmsen, Ph.D., CFS, is a recognized expert in food safety and sampling, serving for over 30 years in both academic and industrial positions. In these roles, he has provided technical leadership and innovation for industrial collaborations. His technical contributions and practical innovations have been fundamental in developing proprietary technology, as well as establishing new revenue streams and profitable businesses in juices, dietary supplements and botanicals, agricultural commodities, byproducts, and beverages. He can be reached at the Alliance of Technical Professionals: eric.wilhelmsen@atpconsultants.com.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Microbiological
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Personal Hygiene/Handwashing
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Risk Assessment
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Subscribe For Free!
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to eNewsletter
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Two men standing in a produce storage facility having a discussion.
    Sponsored byOrkin Commercial

    Staying Compliant With FSMA

  • Deli Salads
    Sponsored byCorbion

    How Food Safety is Becoming the Ultimate Differentiator in Refrigerated and Prepared Foods

Popular Stories

Image of produce being washed on a conveyor belt in a facility

Science in Action: How Nanobubbles Are Advancing Food Safety Standards

FoodSafetyMattersFinal-900x550-(002).jpg

Ep. 195. Dr. Christopher Daubert: The Value of a Food Science Education

Students returning their lunch trays in a cafeteria

California Bill Would Remove Ultra-Processed Foods from School Lunches

Events

June 26, 2025

How to Design and Conduct Challenge Studies for Safer Products and Longer Shelf Life

Live: June 26, 2025 at 2:00 pm EDT: During this webinar, attendees will learn how to conduct challenge studies for microbial spoilage and pathogen growth, including the common challenges encountered, laboratory selection, and use of predictive models.

May 11, 2026

The Food Safety Summit

Stay informed on the latest food safety trends, innovations, emerging challenges, and expert analysis. Leave the Summit with actionable insights ready to drive measurable improvements in your organization. Do not miss this opportunity to learn from experts about contamination control, food safety culture, regulations, sanitation, supply chain traceability, and so much more.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products
Environmental Monitoring Excellence eBook

Related Articles

  • Cantaloupe

    What Was Not Learned from the FDA Investigation of Salmonella on Cantaloupe in 2022?

    See More
  • Addressing Misconceptions about Sampling and Testing of Leafy Greens

    Addressing Misconceptions about Sampling and Testing of Leafy Greens

    See More
  • cantaloupe rinds close up

    Can Cantaloupe Be Made Fit For Purpose?

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 9781138070912.jpg

    Trends in Food Safety and Protection

  • 1119237963.jpg

    Food Safety in China: Science, Technology, Management and Regulation

  • global food.jpg

    Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Directories

  • Anton Paar

    Founded in 1922 in Graz (Austria), Anton Paar is the world market leader in the measurement of density and concentration, the determination of dissolved carbon dioxide, and the fields of rheometry and viscometry. Laboratory and process measuring instruments from Anton Paar are used in the control of incoming goods, quality control and research throughout production in the food industry.
  • Datang Steel Pipe Manufacturing Co. Ltd.

    Datang slogan is professional concentration pipeline & accessories 20 years. Datang company's tenet is to be China's most professional pipeline and Tubes suppliers, on the basis of seamless steel pipe, integrate the national high quality pipe equipment resources, provide one-stop packaging services,quality makes customer trust, service makes customer relieved, resule makes customer comfort, building a conscience, good-hearted, have the sense of responsibility, contributes to the society of the enterprise.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

eNewsletter | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing