Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin instagram youtube
  • Sign In
  • Join Today
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • eBooks
    • Sponsored Insights
    • Sponsored White Papers
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • MORE
    • BUYER'S GUIDE
    • NEWSLETTERS >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • FSM FEATURES
    • FSM Features Collection
    • eMag Archives
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • JOIN
NewsContamination ControlChemical ControlMicrobiological Control

EFSA Identifies Five Alternaria Mycotoxins in Food as Genotoxic, Finds Children Have Highest Exposure

By Food Safety Magazine Editorial Team
child eating bowl of cereal
Image credit: pinstock/iStock/Getty Images Plus via Getty Images
November 11, 2026

Need to Know

  • EFSA identified five of eight Alternaria mycotoxins found in food and feed as genotoxic: Alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), altertoxin I (ATX-I), altertoxin II (ATX-II), and stemphyltoxin III (STTX-III)
  • Dietary exposure to AOH and AME exceeded the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for substances with potential DNA-damaging and/or carcinogenic properties in most population groups, warranting further risk assessment
  • Tenuazonic acid (TeA) was the most frequently quantified Alternaria toxin in food, and while EFSA concluded that adverse effects from its non-genotoxic activity were unlikely at current dietary exposure levels, its genotoxic potential remains unclear
  • Infants, toddlers, and other young children generally had the highest estimated dietary exposure relative to body weight, with major contributing foods including cereal-based products, fruit products and juices, tomatoes, vegetables, and vegetable oils
  • Significant data gaps remain regarding animal health risks and combined exposure to Alternaria toxins, warranting further toxicological research, improved analytical methods, and continued monitoring of food and feed

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has published an updated scientific opinion on the risks to human and animal health associated with eight Alternaria toxins in food and feed, concluding that five of the toxins are genotoxic, meaning they can damage DNA.

The updated scientific opinion, adopted by EFSA's Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel), considered new scientific evidence, occurrence data, and dietary exposure estimates. Requested by the European Commission, the assessment updated EFSA's previous opinion on Alternaria toxins, published in 2011.

Alternaria toxins are mycotoxins produced predominantly by fungi of the genus Alternaria, particularly A. alternata. These fungi can contaminate a range of agricultural commodities, including fruits, vegetables, cereals, and oilseeds.

The assessment covered eight toxins: alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), altenuene (ALT), altertoxin I (ATX-I), altertoxin II (ATX-II), stemphyltoxin III (STTX-III), tenuazonic acid (TeA), and tentoxin (TEN).

Five Alternaria Toxins Identified as Genotoxic

EFSA concluded that five of the eight assessed toxins were genotoxic: AOH, AME, ATX-I, ATX-II, and STTX-III.

For AOH and AME, the panel determined that the toxins induce DNA damage through a non-threshold mechanism of action, meaning that scientists were unable to identify a level of exposure at which the possibility of harm can be completely ruled out. Estimated mean chronic dietary exposures to both toxins exceeded the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) of 2.5 nanograms per kilogram (ng/kg) of body weight (bw) per day for substances with potential DNA-reactive mutagenic and/or carcinogenic properties in most population groups.

EFSA noted that a risk characterization approach other than the TTC would be needed to assess the risks associated with the genotoxicity of AOH and AME.

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

Although ATX-I, ATX-II, and STTX-III were also identified as genotoxic, insufficient occurrence data and toxicological studies prevented EFSA from characterizing the risks associated with dietary exposure to these substances.

Tenuazonic Acid Most Prevalent in Food, but Low Probability of Adverse Effects

TeA was the most frequently quantified Alternaria toxin in food, with the highest reported concentrations found in mulberries, paprika powder, and processed tomato products.

The assessment considered 57,104 analytical results from 16,283 food samples collected between 2015 and 2024, covering five toxins: AOH, AME, ALT, TeA, and TEN.

Among the foods analyzed, the highest mean TeA concentrations were reported in mulberries (14,373 micrograms per kilogram [μg/kg]) and paprika powder (11,650 μg/kg). Relatively high concentrations were also identified in processed tomato products, exceeding those found in fresh tomatoes.

Available toxicological evidence was insufficient to determine whether TeA is genotoxic. However, regarding its non-genotoxic effects, EFSA concluded with 98 percent certainty that dietary exposure would not exceed the TTC of 1,500 ng/kg bw/day for any population group, indicating a low probability of adverse health effects.

For ALT and TEN, which EFSA determined were not genotoxic, estimated dietary exposures were below the relevant TTC of 1,500 ng/kg bw/day. The panel therefore concluded that adverse health effects from exposure to these toxins were unlikely at current dietary exposure levels.

Young Children Had Highest Estimated Dietary Exposure

EFSA's assessment identified infants, toddlers, and other young children as the population groups with the highest estimated dietary exposure to Alternaria toxins relative to body weight.

The foods contributing most to exposure varied by toxin and age group, but included cereal-based foods, fruit products and juices, tomatoes, vegetables, grain-based products, and vegetable oils.

For TeA, estimated mean dietary exposure was highest among toddlers, ranging from 581–675 ng/kg bw/day, while the highest rate of exposure in the 95th percentile was estimated among other children, at 1,811–1,925 ng/kg bw/day.

For AOH, the highest mean exposure was estimated among infants, while the highest 95th-percentile exposure occurred among toddlers. For AME, both mean and high dietary exposures were greatest among other children.

EFSA noted that dietary exposure estimates were generally higher than those reported in its 2016 assessment. However, the increase was attributed to improved coverage of food categories in the available occurrence data, rather than evidence of increased Alternaria toxin contamination.

Animal Health Risks Remain Uncertain

EFSA determined that additional data are needed to characterize the risks of Alternaria toxins in feed for most animal species.

Based on available evidence, adverse health effects from dietary exposure to AOH and AME were considered unlikely for chickens raised for meat production at current feed concentrations.

However, potential health risks from TeA exposure could not be excluded for chickens raised for meat production or laying hens.

The assessment identified a lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) for TeA of 0.63 milligrams (mg)/kg bw/day, based on a 21-day oral exposure study in chickens. A conservative dietary exposure scenario, assuming a diet consisting exclusively of contaminated wheat, produced exposure estimates corresponding to approximately 10 percent of this LOAEL.

For other animal species and toxins, insufficient occurrence and toxicity data prevented a comprehensive risk characterization.

EFSA Calls for Additional Research and Monitoring

EFSA identified several data gaps requiring further investigation, including the occurrence, toxicological effects, and combined risks of Alternaria toxins in food and feed.

The panel recommended improving analytical methods and developing standards for toxins that cannot currently be reliably quantified, particularly ATX-II and STTX-III, as well as certain modified forms of Alternaria toxins.

Additional recommendations included continued monitoring of foods and feeds that contribute most to dietary exposure, further investigation of TeA genotoxicity, and research into the effects of food processing on toxin concentrations.

EFSA also explored the use of non-animal testing methods, combining in vitro data with physiologically based kinetic modeling, to estimate a dietary exposure level for TeA that would not be expected to cause adverse effects. However, remaining uncertainties prevented the results from being used in the final risk assessment.

The panel emphasized the need for additional toxicological and occurrence data to address remaining uncertainties and support future risk assessments, including evaluations of combined exposure to multiple Alternaria toxins.

KEYWORDS: EFSA exposure science mycotoxins

Share This Story

Fsm purple logo 200x200

The Food Safety Magazine editorial team comprises Bailee Henderson, Director of Content Strategy and news editor ✉, and Adrienne Blume, M.A., Director of Editorial and Industry Engagement.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Food Type
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Management
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Best Practices
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • Join Food Safety Magazine
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • pre-packaged salads, noodles, and prepared meals stocked on multi-tier grocery store refrigerator shelves
    Sponsored byCorbion

    How Many Days of Shelf Life Are You Leaving on the Table?

  • Top view portrait of two factory workers standing by conveyor belt during quality inspection at food production, copy space
    Sponsored byFlexXray

    Foreign Material By the Numbers: What the 2026 Benchmark Report Reveals

  • a conveyorized industrial metal detector system that appears to resemble a Loma Systems IQ4 Metal Detector setup with an integrated conveyor belt and control panel for food or package inspection.
    Sponsored byMettler Toledo

    Beyond Detection: How to Avoid Physical Contamination in Food Through a Smarter Inspection Strategy

Popular Stories

supermarket freezers

Another Wave of Refrigerator Cyberattacks Sweeps European Grocery Stores, Causing More Food Losses

dino nuggets and ketchup

WHO Proposes Food Profiling Model to Inform Regulation of Ultra-Processed Foods

Cleaning floor drain during wet sanitation

Practical Guidelines for Choosing Between Dry and Wet Sanitation

allergens ebook

Events

November 12, 2026

From Data Overload to Actionable Food Safety Risk Intelligence

Live: November 12, 2026 at 11:00 am EST: This webinar explores how data integration, advanced analytics, and digital technologies can help transform disparate information into meaningful risk intelligence.

November 17, 2026

Are You Getting the Most from Your Food Safety Testing?

Live: November 17, 2026 at 11:00 am EST: Attend this webinar to explore practical ways food processors can modernize sanitation verification and microbiological testing while keeping workflows simple and effective.

December 2, 2026

Beyond Surface Clean: Tackling Biofilms and Persistent Pathogens

Live: December 2, 2026 at 11:00 am EST: Attend this webinar to understand why chlorine dioxide is not chlorine, and what “ultra-pure” means for residues, byproducts, and effectiveness.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • bowl of cereal and milk

    Researchers Stress Importance of Monitoring Emerging Unregulated Mycotoxins in Food

    See More
  • bunch of wheat on a table

    FSA, FSS Call for Data on T-2, HT-2 Mycotoxins in Food

    See More
  • wheat and pasta

    ILSI Europe Introduces Risk Prioritization Framework for Mycotoxins in Food

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 9781138070912.jpg

    Trends in Food Safety and Protection

  • 1119237963.jpg

    Food Safety in China: Science, Technology, Management and Regulation

  • 9781498721776.jpg

    Handbook of Food Processing: Food Safety, Quality, and Manufacturing Processes

See More Products

Related Directories

  • Women In Food Safety

    Women in Food Safety is a US-based global nonprofit organization dedicated to empowering and advancing women in the food safety and quality industry. Women In Food Safety provides a platform for professionals at all stages of their careers to grow, share knowledge, and support one another. Through community events, educational initiatives, and leadership development, we are building a more inclusive and resilient future for food safety worldwide. Together, we can do BETTER!
  • Food Radar Systems in Sweden AB

    Food Radar Systems, based in Sweden, develops microwave technology that detects and rejects low-density foreign bodies in pumpable food products, helping food manufacturers improve safety, protect consumers, and strengthen quality assurance in modern production environments.
  • Mecmesin USA trading as PPT Group Corp.

    Mecmesin designs and manufactures precision force, materials and torque testing systems for food and beverage quality assurance. Our solutions measure texture, package seal strength, closure torque, tensile and compression performance, helping manufacturers verify product and packaging consistency, support compliance, improve process control and reduce the risk of costly quality-related failures.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends shaping the food safety industry

Newsletters | Website | FSM Features Collection

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
  • JOIN TODAY
    • Create Account
    • FSM Features Collection
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
    • YouTube
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing