Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin instagram youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • NEWSLETTERS >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
NewsContamination ControlFood TypeChemical ControlProduce

Consumer Reports Analyzes Seven Years of USDA Pesticide Residue Monitoring Data, Highlights Risky Foods

By Food Safety Magazine Editorial Team
green string beans in brown crate

Image credit: Sonja Langford via Unsplash

April 18, 2024

Based on an analysis of seven years of data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Pesticide Data Program (USDA’s PDP), comprising pesticide residue test results for 29,643 individual food samples, watchdog group Consumer Reports (CR) is warning that it found pesticide residues to pose “significant risks” in 20 percent of produce analyzed. At the same time, CR found that pesticide residues were not a concern for nearly two-thirds of the foods included in its study, including nearly all of the organic samples.

USDA’s PDP continuously monitors pesticide residues in U.S. foods. CR’s report shortly follows USDA’s PDP Annual Summary published in January 2024, which asserts that, in 2022 (the most recent reporting period), over 99 percent of samples tested had pesticide residues that fell below the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) established benchmark levels, and that 27.6 percent of samples had no detectable residue.

Although USDA’s PDP Annual Summary emphasizes that more than 99 percent of produce falls below EPA benchmark levels, CR scientists believe EPA tolerances are set too high, and therefore CR used lower pesticide residue limits than EPA tolerances when determining which foods pose a risk to human health in its analysis. More specifically, per CR’s analytical method, a fruit or vegetable could be determined as “low-risk” even if it contained several pesticides, if the combination of the number, concentration, and toxicity of the chemicals is low. For example, although broccoli was found to contain several pesticide residues, CR considers the commodity low-risk because chemicals of greater health concern were present in only a few samples and at low levels. On the other hand, CR raised alarm bells about watermelon because of a single pesticide—oxamyl—which is associated with harms to human health and was found in 11 of 331 conventionally grown, domestic watermelon samples.

According to CR’s present analysis, pesticide residues were most present in bell peppers, blueberries, green beans, potatoes, and strawberries. In general, 16 of the 25 fruits and 21 of the 34 vegetables in CR’s analysis had low levels of pesticide risk, meaning that even children and pregnant people can safely eat more than three servings a day of those foods. Additionally, ten foods were of moderate risk, meaning that up to three servings a day are safe to eat. In contrast, 12 foods presented more serious health concerns.

As noted in USDA’s recent PDP Annual Summary, CR underlines that some foods can contain residues of pesticides that have been banned in the U.S. for a decade or more, such as DDT and its metabolites, among other chemicals. For example, CR found methamidophos (banned from foods since 2009), a metabolite of the pesticide acephate (banned for use on green beans since 2011), in 4 percent of conventional, domestic green bean samples—at levels surpassing those that CR scientists consider safe by more than 100 times.

CR also found that imported produce, especially from Mexico, carries higher levels of pesticide residues than domestic produce. More specifically, seven imported foods were found to pose a “very high risk,” compared to only four domestic foods, and of the 100 individual fruit or vegetable samples with the highest risk levels, 65 were imported. Furthermore, 52 of those 65 very high-risk imports came from Mexico, the majority of which were strawberries and green beans.  

A chart published alongside CR’s report visualizes the level of risk (per CR standards) posed by pesticide residues in 25 fruits and 34 vegetables, both conventionally grown and organic, and both U.S. grown and imported. Risk levels correspond to the number of servings a 35-pound child could safely consume each day, and are based on a pesticide’s chronic toxicity. Overall, when deciding on conventional fruits and vegetables to consume, CR recommends choosing those rated on its chart as “very low,” “low,” or “moderate-risk.” When possible, CR suggests replacing a food rated “high-risk” or “very high-risk” with a lower-risk commodity, or to choose organic. CR emphasizes that risk comes from consuming repeated servings over time.

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

KEYWORDS: Consumer Reports Pesticide Data Program (PDP) pesticide residues study

Share This Story

Fsm purple logo 200x200

The Food Safety Magazine editorial team comprises Bailee Henderson, Digital Editor ✉ and Adrienne Blume, M.A., Editorial Director.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Food Type
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Management
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Management
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to Newsletters
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • The image displays a person selecting packaged fresh chicken meat from a supermarket display cooler.
    Sponsored byCorbion

    Developing a Future-Proof Food Safety Strategy for Meat and Poultry Products

  • The image shows a variety of fresh produce packaged in plastic trays and wrap.
    Sponsored byWaters Corporation

    PFAS-Free Food Packaging by August 2026

  • This image displays a multi-stage water filtration system designed to remove contaminants from drinking water.
    Sponsored byWaterdrop Filter

    The 4.0 ppt Era: Future-Proofing Your Food Supply Chain Against 'Forever Chemicals'

Popular Stories

half shredded block of cheddar cheese and pile of cheese shreds on wooden cutting board

Patient Count in Raw Farm E. coli Outbreak Grows, Majority are Young Children

RAW FARM-brand raw cheddar cheese shreds

Amid E. coli Outbreak, Congress Urges FDA to Mandate Raw Cheese Recall

smiling employee in bottling factory looking at camera with arms crossed in front of production line

GFSI Unveils Updated Food Safety Culture Framework

foreign material webinar


Events

April 8, 2026

Foreign Material Contamination: Why In-Line Reinspection Isn't Enough

Live: April 8, 2026, at 11:00 am EDT: From this webinar, attendees will learn why reinspecting with in-line equipment is not sufficient when it comes to potential foreign material contamination.

April 16, 2026

Recordkeeping and Document Management for Food Safety Compliance

Live: April 16, 2026, at 2:00 pm EDT: From this webinar, attendees will learn why recordkeeping and document control are essential to food safety and business management.

May 11, 2026

The Food Safety Summit

Stay informed on the latest food safety trends, innovations, emerging challenges, and expert analysis. Leave the Summit with actionable insights ready to drive measurable improvements in your organization. Do not miss this opportunity to learn from experts about contamination control, food safety culture, regulations, sanitation, supply chain traceability, and so much more.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • many different fruit and veg

    USDA Reports 99 Percent of Foods Tested in 2024 Complied with Pesticide Residue Tolerances

    See More
  • crops being sprayed

    USDA Testing for 2023 Shows 99 Percent of Foods Do Not Exceed Pesticide Residue Tolerances

    See More
  • Agricultural Pesticide Spraying

    USDA Releases Annual Pesticide Residue Report, Finds 99 Percent of Samples Below Benchmarks

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • food-safety-making.jpg

    Food Safety: Making Foods Safe and Free From Pathogens

  • 9781498721776.jpg

    Handbook of Food Processing: Food Safety, Quality, and Manufacturing Processes

  • 1444333348.jpg

    Handbook of Food Safety Engineering

See More Products

Related Directories

  • North American Chemical Residue Workshop

    NACRW) formerly the Florida Pesticide Residue Workshop conducts an annual meeting for scientists particularly interested in trace level analysis of pesticides, veterinary drug residues, and other chemicals in food, animal feed, and environmental samples. The purpose of the meeting is to provide training, develop and improve technical knowledge, facilitate development and distribution of new analysis methods and techniques, and establish networking to promote professional cooperation between scientists of these interests.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing