Food Safety
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • ENEWSLETTER >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!

Meat Science Review

Continued pre-harvest efforts to address Salmonella in bovine lymph nodes

By Ashley Arnold
Meat Science Review
June 20, 2018

It is well known that Salmonella is one of the leading causes of foodborne illness in the United States. After a series of salmonellosis outbreaks linked to ground beef that occurred annually from 2011 to 2013, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) sought to reduce the number of FSIS-attributable salmonellosis cases. Accordingly, FSIS released a two-year Salmonella action plan that contained 10 objectives or activities, including: “Explore the contribution of lymph nodes to Salmonella contamination” and “Pre-harvest related activities.”

Following the initial release of this comprehensive plan to address Salmonella in meat and poultry products, annual action plan updates were released in 2015 and 2016. FSIS determined both objectives mentioned above have been fully completed. A number of items resulting from the completion of these objectives directly affect the meat and poultry industries. With regard to lymph nodes (LNs), the most notable considerations are for:  beef and pork slaughter modernization; increased sampling of head and cheek meat, and possible targeting of LNs; and the planned release of a guidance document, Compliance Guidelines for Minimizing the Risk of STEC and Salmonella in Beef (including Veal) Slaughter Operations, which has since been released. Through the compliance guideline, FSIS issued a number of additional recommendations to lessen the impact of Salmonella in LNs. These include the removal of major peripheral LNs from carcasses, treating heads following LN incision by inspection personnel and diverting head and cheek meat to a full-lethality treatment. The completion of the pre-harvest objective was achieved by updating an existing draft guidance document to include potential pre-harvest intervention strategies to reduce Salmonella contamination that may translate to post-harvest products. The updated guideline, however, addresses poultry, not red-meat species, leaving great opportunity for researchers to continue efforts to identify and validate pre-harvest interventions and best practices for reduction of Salmonella prevalence in hogs and cattle.

In an effort to maintain forward progression toward developing pre-harvest best practices to reduce Salmonella contamination in bovine LNs, researchers across the U.S. have evaluated differences in Salmonella prevalence rates across feeding operations, seasons, regions and cattle types. To continue expanding the current bank of literature addressing pre-harvest cattle management and Salmonella in LNs, our research team conducted a study working with two feeding operations known to harbor salmonellae in the feeding environment. Additionally, these operations were known to consistently produce cattle with differing rates (one “high” and one “low”) of Salmonella prevalence in LNs at harvest. To determine whether the difference in Salmonella prevalence between the feeding operations was because of cattle source or other factors associated with different stages of feeding, weanling steers with common genetic backgrounds, originating from the Texas A&M University McGregor Research Center (McGregor, TX), were followed through the stages of feeding at each operation. In total, 80 Angus-sired beef steers were randomly assigned to a feeding operation (A or B) and a feeding stage: post-weaning; background or stocker; 60 days on feed; or 120 days on feed. Specifically, 20 steers assigned to feeding stage one were transported to the Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center (College Station, Texas) for harvest and subsequent LN collection in lieu of traveling to a feeding operation. The remaining 60 steers were divided equally and transported to either feeding operation A or B. Steers were allowed to commingle with non-study cattle and were subjected to practices typical of each feeding operation. At the conclusion of each progressive feeding stage, 10 steers from each feeding operation were transported for harvest and sample collection. It should be noted that four steers did not complete the study. Upon completion of each feeding stage, left and right superficial cervical and subiliac LNs were collected (n = 304), and pooled by both type and animal, effectively yielding two samples per animal (n = 152 total LN samples). In short, LN samples were aseptically processed using previously published methods, subjected to Salmonella prevalence determination, confirmed using PCR and subjected to serotyping as appropriate.

Rates of Salmonella prevalence differed significantly between feeding operations A and B, with all operation A samples returning negative results. All samples obtained from weanling steers (feeding stage 1) also were found to be Salmonella-negative. Among samples from operation B, an increase in Salmonella-positive results was seen as steers progressed into later stages of feeding. Specifically, 22 percent (4 of 18), 77.8 percent (14 of 18) and 94.4 percent (17 of 18) for feeding stages 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Of the serovars isolated, Montevideo, Mbandaka, and Anatum comprised the majority.

When controlling for cattle source, differences in Salmonella prevalence between feeding operations persisted, with operation A continuing to produce cattle with significantly lower rates of Salmonella prevalence than operation B. Further, sequestration of Salmonella in LNs of cattle fed at operation B increased as cattle were moved into pens for finishing. While we cannot explain the reasons for these findings, the outcomes of this study strongly indicate that factors other than incoming cattle source are responsible for differences in Salmonella presence in the LNs of feedlot cattle. Advancement of this sector of pre-harvest research is heavily dependent upon quantifying the contribution of environmental, management and possibly other factors yet to be identified. A better understanding of these factors, combined with a more complete knowledge of transmission routes will likely be key in developing interventions and/or best practices to mitigate pre-harvest Salmonella contamination of bovine LNs.  NP

This article was originally posted on www.provisioneronline.com.
KEYWORDS: meat science review pathogen reduction strategies pre-harvest interventions Salmonella

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Ashley N. Arnold is an assistant research professor, Meat Science, at Texas A&M. Contact her at a.arnold@tamu.edu or (979) 862-3643.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Food Type
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Management
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Best Practices
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to eNewsletter
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • mold
    Sponsored byIFC

    Tackling Mold Remediation in Food Processing Plants

  • a worker in a food processing plant
    Sponsored byLPS® DETEX®

    How a Beverage Facility Improved Food Safety and Compliance with Detectable Packaging Solutions

  • Two men standing in a produce storage facility having a discussion.
    Sponsored byOrkin Commercial

    Staying Compliant With FSMA

Popular Stories

sunflower oil

Louisiana Passes ‘MAHA’ Bill Targeting More Than 40 Ingredients, Including Seed Oils, Dyes, Sweeteners

Raw chicken legs with vegetables on a dark plate

Cases of Salmonella and Campylobacter in England Hit Highest Levels in a Decade

smoked salmon in oil

Study Shows Food Type Significantly Affects Listeria’s Ability to Survive Digestion, Cause Sickness

Events

July 15, 2025

Hygienic Design Risk Management: Industry Challenges and Global Insights

Live: July 15, 2025 at 11:00 am EDT: From this webinar, attendees will learn the importance of hygienic design to ensure food safety and sanitation effectiveness.

July 22, 2025

Beyond the Binder: Digital Management of Food Safety

Live: July 22, 2025 at 3:00 pm EDT: During this webinar, attendees will learn best practices for the use of digital food safety management systems across industry and regulatory agencies.

August 7, 2025

Achieve Active Managerial Control of Major Risk Factors Using a Food Safety Management System

Live: August 7, 2025 at 2:00 pm EDT: From this webinar, attendees will learn about changes to the FDA Food Code, which now includes a requirement for FSMS. 

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products
Environmental Monitoring Excellence eBook

Related Articles

  • State of an Industry: Salmonella and Bovine Lymph Nodes

    See More
  • turkey farm

    First Pre-Harvest Study of Salmonella in Turkeys for Ground Meat

    See More
  • cows feeding

    Pre-Harvest Strategies to Reduce Foodborne Pathogens in Red Meat Production

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 1119237963.jpg

    Food Safety in China: Science, Technology, Management and Regulation

  • 9781138070912.jpg

    Trends in Food Safety and Protection

  • 1118474600.jpg

    Practical Food Safety: Contemporary Issues and Future Directions

See More Products

Related Directories

  • Salus Scientific Inc.

    Providing innovative bacteria enrichment and culture mediums to detect pathogenic, spoilage, or other contaminating bacteria. The Actero™ Enrichment Media benefits are one step enrichment, faster “time-to-results”, and targeted accuracy. Actero™ EZ-Media Bag provides pre-measured and pre-sterilized enrichment media that can be prepared in under 30-minutes. The newest innovation is a true Multiplex enrichment media that simultaneously enriches 2 to 3 pathogenic bacteria in one step. “Always Easy. Always Right.”
  • NSF

    Since 1944, NSF has stood at the forefront of global efforts to improve human and planet health. As an independent, internationally recognized organization, we play a pivotal role in the development of robust public health standards. NSF engages in the rigorous testing, auditing, and certification of various products and services.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

eNewsletter | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing