Food Safety
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • ENEWSLETTER >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
News

Industry Weighs In on Listeria monocytogenes and Ag Water Regulations

February 15, 2018

Source: The Packer

As part of a broad Trump administration review of regulations on the books, the Food and Drug has taken public comments on a “Review of Existing Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Regulatory and Information Collection Requirements.”

About 70 comments were received, and a couple of comments were provided by a coalition of industry associations.

Here is a comment on FDA's regulatory policy regarding Listeria monocytogenes.

On behalf of our members, the Produce Marketing Association (PMA) and United Fresh Produce Association, together with the California Fresh Fruit Association, Canadian Produce Marketing Association, Florida Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association, Northwest Horticultural Council, Texas International Produce Association, and Western Growers, respectfully submit the following comments to the Federal Register Notice of 8 September 2017 entitled “Review of Existing Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Regulatory and Information Collection Requirements” [Docket No. FDA-2017-N-5094]

FDA Regulatory Policy Regarding Listeria monocytogenes Associated with Fresh Produce

Please find attached our full comments in the suggested format regarding the specific issue of “FDA Regulatory Policy Regarding Listeria monocytogenes Associated with Fresh Produce”. To summarize our comment:

The produce industry is acutely aware of the potential adverse public health consequences that can be associated with Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) and fresh produce. However, fresh produce poses a unique challenge among FDA regulated foods in that:

1) most produce items do not receive a listeriacidal treatment before consumption,

2) produce items may or may not support Lm growth,

3) preventive controls to eliminate the presence of Lm where produce is grown are very limited and

4) fresh produce is likely to have a low persistent prevalence of Lm.

The produce industry acknowledges that control of Lm must be assessed and addressed during development and implementation of preventive controls for fresh produce during postharvest handling and fresh-cut processing. However, naturally occurring transient Lm may at low prevalence and numbers occur on fresh produce in open fields where produce is grown and should not be considered an adulterant of fresh RTE produce. Therefore, it is requested that FDA consider exempting or establishing a tolerance for Lm as it relates to fresh produce RACs as there are no known preventive controls that can be implemented to reduce, control or eliminate Lm on fresh produce during growing operations in open fields. These naturally occurring levels of Lm do not ordinarily render the food injurious to health.

We thank the agency for taking on this initiative and for the opportunity to provide feedback on our priorities.

Tom Karst, The Packer's National Editor (herein referred to as TK): For more background on this issue, check out this Western Growers article Listeria: Zero Tolerance or Low Levels? from Western Growers magazine.

Another joint submission here, on the topic of the produce safety rule for agricultural water.

On behalf of our members, the Produce Marketing Association (PMA) and United Fresh Produce Association, together with the California Fresh Fruit Association, Canadian Produce Marketing Association, Florida Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association, Georgia Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association, Northwest Horticultural Council, and Texas International Produce Association, respectfully submit the attached comments to the Federal Register Notice of 8 September 2017 entitled “Review of Existing Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Regulatory and Information Collection Requirements” [Docket No. FDA-2017-N-5094]

FSMA Produce Safety Rule Agricultural Water

Please find attached our full comments in the suggested format regarding the specific issue of “Produce Industry FSMA Implementing Regulation Coverage”.

Subpart E of the Produce Safety Rule focuses on agricultural water. This subpart contains testing frequencies (depending on the source), microbiological limits (depending on the use of the water) and specifies test methodology as well as other details. Interpretation of how to define and monitor that water is adequate for its intended use is situation specific based on commodity, region, and other factors. As written, 21 CFR 112 Subpart E contains prescriptive requirements that are not achievable by some growers, and further, have no quantifiable public health benefit.

Research shows that what is adequate for one region or commodity may be different in another region or commodity. A one-size-fits-all approach to water quality management is not risk-based and not adaptable based on future research. Different commodity groups and different sectors of the industry have already evaluated and implemented risk-based approaches to manage water quality in ways that are reflective of the different risks. FDA should recognize these efforts. Subpart E of the rule lacks the flexibility to incorporate new science and prevents growers from managing water quality based on their specific circumstances.

We applaud FDA’s attempt to provide flexibility through the use of “alternatives”. However, the inability to accurately assess the level of public health protection related to Subpart E precludes growers from using “alternatives” that comply with the criteria established in the rule. The recent draft guidance describing how to determine if an approach reaches the “same level of public health protection” is inadequate to give growers confidence in using alternatives.

In recognition of the concerns pertaining to Subpart E, FDA has expressed their willingness to evaluate ways to simplify the agricultural water requirements for growers. We encourage FDA to provide a timeline and process associated with this undertaking so that the industry can be prepared to comply.

We thank the agency for taking on this initiative and for the opportunity to provide feedback on our priorities.

TK: These are long-term issues for the industry, so don’t expect a quick turnaround from regulators on either of these issues. Did the associations strike the right notes in these comments? Does anyone disagree about the value of a tolerance for Lm on raw agricultural commodities or more flexibility in the water rule?

More on ag water from Food Safety Magazine:
Fixing FSMA's Ag Water Requirements 
A New Era of Food Safety Regulation Begins 
A Long Row to Hoe for Safer Food

 


Author(s): The Packer

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Food Type
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Training
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    International
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Subscribe For Free!
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to eNewsletter
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Deli Salads
    Sponsored byCorbion

    How Food Safety is Becoming the Ultimate Differentiator in Refrigerated and Prepared Foods

Popular Stories

Image of Tyson Foods logo and the logos of Tyson Foods brands

Tyson Foods is Reformulating Food Products to Eliminate Petroleum-Based Synthetic Dyes

USDA building.jpg

More Than 15,000 USDA Employees Take Trump Administration's Resignation Offer

Woman reading the warning label on a bottle of wine

A 40-Year Hangover: Efforts to Revive 1980s Advocacy About the Potential Negative Effects of Alcohol Consumption

Events

May 12, 2025

The Food Safety Summit

Stay informed on the latest food safety trends, innovations, emerging challenges, and expert analysis. Leave the Summit with actionable insights ready to drive measurable improvements in your organization. Do not miss this opportunity to learn from experts about contamination control, food safety culture, regulations, sanitation, supply chain traceability, and so much more.

May 14, 2025

Proven Practices for Allergen Management

Live Streaming from the Food Safety Summit: This session tackles the importance and impact of allergen management in product development, production, and labeling. 

May 15, 2025

Alarm Fatigue: How to Ensure Out-of-Compliance Alarms Serve Their Purpose and Ensure Food Safety

Live Streaming from the Food Safety Summit: This session will explore the challenges of setting effective alarms for out-of-compliance hot and cold holding temperatures in food safety management. 

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products
Environmental Monitoring Excellence eBook

Related Articles

  • sprinkler watering crops

    FDA Removes Listeria from Test Panel for Preharvest Ag Water Treatments Protocol

    See More
  • cold cuts platter

    Proposed Amendments Would Expand EU Regulations on Allowable Levels of Listeria in RTE Foods

    See More
  • swab and petri dish

    Experts Advise FDA, USDA-FSIS on RTE Pathogen Testing, Food Safety of Reused Ag Water

    See More
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

eNewsletter | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing