Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin instagram youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • NEWSLETTERS >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!

Regulations & Legislation

FSIS moves on label claim sampling program, partially hydrogenated oils

By John Dillard
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Building
July 9, 2018

The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) recently issued two announcements that may be of interest to the meat and poultry industry. First, FSIS announced its plans to launch a labeling claim sampling program. Second, FSIS issued an extension to allow manufacturers to phase out certain uses of partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs).

 

Sampling for Labeling Claims Verification

FSIS announced plans to expand its efforts to use sampling and testing to verify certain label claims on May 7, 2018. FSIS Notice 26-18, FSIS Sampling for Labeling Claims Verification directs inspection program personnel (IPP) to collect directed labeling verification samples to test whether select labeling claims are accurate. 

The label verification program will target two types of products: products in consumer-ready packaging that bear certain labeling claims; and raw ground beef in consumer-ready packaging that bears a nutrition facts panel. The specific labeling claims/product combinations that will be verified through sampling are “soy-free” claims in ready-to-eat products, “raised without antibiotics” in raw chicken parts and “raised without hormones” in raw ground beef. Notice 26-18 also directs IPP to collect samples of raw ground beef in consumer-ready packaging to verify the accuracy of fat and sodium content claims on nutrition facts panels.

Establishments will not be required to hold product pending the sampling findings; however, Notice 26-18 notes IPP will deem a product that bears inaccurate “soy free” or similar claims adulterated and misbranded; FSIS would take regulatory action in these instances. In contrast, the label claim verification results for fat and sodium content, antibiotic-free and hormone-free claims will be reported to FSIS’ Labeling and Program Delivery Staff (LPDS) and Policy Analysis Staff for further review. If there is a discrepancy between the sampling test result and the establishment’s labeling claim, LPDS will issue a letter to the establishment and the Inspector-in-Charge and District Office reporting the findings. Within 30 days of receiving such a letter, establishments will be required to provide LPDS a written response detailing the corrective actions the facility has taken to ensure it is fulfilling the stated label claim. FSIS may take further action if it determines an establishment has failed to take appropriate action or demonstrate fulfillment of a stated claim.

While FSIS has been sampling nutrient content claims in ground beef since 2016, the expansion of the sampling program to labeling claims is likely a harbinger of things to come. Many brands rely on negative labeling claims (e.g, “gluten free,” “raised without hormones”) to differentiate their products from competitors’ products. Oftentimes, consumers place a premium on products bearing these claims. As its testing capability becomes more sophisticated, we can expect FSIS to continue to expand its labeling claim verification sampling.

 

FSIS Finalizes PHO Phase-Out Plans

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for determining ingredient safety for use in foods. In 2015, FDA issued a final determination that PHOs were no longer “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) due to concerns about the impact of artificial trans fats on cardiovascular health. When it made its determination, FDA established a deadline of June 18, 2018 for manufacturers to cease using PHOs in their products unless such uses were approved by a food additive petition.

In anticipation of FDA’s GRAS determination, the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) submitted a food additive petition in 2015 seeking approval for using PHOs in three circumstances: (1) as a solvent or carrier for flavoring agents, flavor enhancers, and coloring agents; (2) as a processing aid; and (3) as a pan release agent for baked goods in spray. GMA’s petition also proposed limitations on the concentrations of industrially produced trans-fatty acids that could be included in the PHOs.

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

On May 18, 2018, FDA issued an announcement rejecting GMA’s petition. It also, however, announced it would provide industry a one-year extension of the compliance date for the PHO uses sought in the GMA petition. Furthermore, FDA announced that most foods produced prior to the compliance date can remain in commerce until Jan. 1, 2020; the PHO uses subject to the GMA petition can remain in commerce until Jan. 1, 2021.

On June 5, 2018, FSIS issued Notice 31-18 directing IPP to implement the same timelines as provided in FDA’s announcements. The agency also clarified regulatory actions that will be taken after each of the respective compliance dates. NP

This article was originally posted on www.provisioneronline.com.
KEYWORDS: legislation legislative affairs regulations

Share This Story

John Dillard is an attorney with Olsson Frank Weeda Terman Matz PC in Washington, D.C. He focuses his practice on providing regulatory compliance advice and legal representation to food and agricultural clients. John can be reached at jdillard@ofwlaw.com.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Microbiological Control
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Training
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Contamination Control
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to Newsletters
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • NEVIFIT 3 Compartment BPA-FREE
    Sponsored byCorbion

    The Risks of Ready-to-Eat: Five Ways to Protect Today's Prepared Meals

  • a group of workers in a food production facility
    Sponsored bySkillUp by Registrar Corp

    How to Build a Better Training Program: Data and Insights from the Global Food Safety Training Survey

  • the use of dual-energy X-ray food inspection technology to identify foreign contaminants.
    Sponsored byEagle by METTLER TOLEDO

    Precision Inspection Starts with the Right X-ray Detector

Popular Stories

green powder/moringa in wooden mortar

FDA Opens Third Salmonella–Moringa Outbreak Investigation of the Year

FoodSafetyMattersFinal-900x550-(002).jpg

Ep. 218. Dr. Brady Carter: Water Activity, Shelf-Life Validation, and Food Safety Controls

fermented meat

Study is First to Analyze Trends in Foodborne Illness Outbreaks Linked to Non-Dairy Fermented Products

a practical guide to spoilage investigation webinar

Events

June 3, 2026

How to Build a Better Food Safety Training Program

Live: June 3, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Join this webinar to learn how AI is impacting food safety training, and how you can leverage AI in your programs.

June 4, 2026

Building a Stronger Food Safety Program in a Changing GFSI Landscape

Live: June 4, 2026 at 11:00 am EDT: Attend this webinar to understand how GFSI requirements are evolving and what those changes signal for quality programs at food and beverage facilities.

June 10, 2026

A Practical Guide to Spoilage Investigation and Prevention

Live: June 10, 2026 at 11:00 am EDT: Join this webinar to learn how to identify spoilage root causes, reduce risk, and apply data-driven strategies for prevention.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • knife cutting through margarine fda logo overlay

    FDA Finalizes 2015 Determination Revoking GRAS Status for Partially Hydrogenated Oils in Food

    See More
  • assorted cured rte meats

    USDA-FSIS Begins New RTE Sampling Program to Verify Allergen Label Claims

    See More
  • raw pork pieces

    USDA-FSIS Continues Raw Pork Products Sampling Program With Changes

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 9781498721776.jpg

    Handbook of Food Processing: Food Safety, Quality, and Manufacturing Processes

  • 0813808774.jpg

    Improving Import Food Safety

  • 1118396308.jpg

    High Throughput Analysis for Food Safety

See More Products

Related Directories

  • OneVision Corp.

    We develop, manufacture, sell and support can seam inspection and weighing systems to food and beverage canners, can makers, and specialty manufacturers (oil filter, aerosol cans, composite cans). Founded in 1994, we've installed and support more than 350 can seam inspection systems around the world.
  • QualiTru Sampling Systems

    Since 1983, QualiTru Sampling Systems® (formerly QMI) has been the leader in the science of aseptic liquid sampling with innovative, easy-to-use, versatile and cost‑effective sampling systems that help the dairy, beverage and liquid food industries produce safe, quality products across the U.S. and in over 30 countries worldwide.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing