Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin instagram youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Sponsored White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • NEWSLETTERS >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!

The Challenges of Shiga Toxigenic E. coli (STEC) Detection

October 1, 2011

The potential public health risk of the non-O157 Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) continues to top the list of concerns for many food safety professionals. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) introduced its first internal method for detection and isolation of the top six non-O157 STEC in October 2010. More recently, in a special session at the International Association of Food Protection meeting in Milwaukee earlier this year, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack indicated that the USDA is moving forward with plans to develop regulations pertaining to these top STEC in food as early as spring 2012. In the meantime, several leading food companies announced plans to implement testing programs for the top six non-O157 STEC in addition to their existing E. coli O157:H7 testing efforts. However, accurate detection of this group of organisms represents a new and unique challenge to the food industry.

The Rapid Method Dilemma
The top six non-O157 STEC (Top STEC) have been defined by USDA FSIS as E. coli belonging to serogroups O26, O111, O103, O121, O145 or O45 and possessing both the eae gene and either the stx1 or stx2 genes. Because this definition includes both an immunological component of the O-antigen and a genetic component of specific pathogenicity genes, rapid methods employing only a single detection technology will generate a high frequency of false positives. Because many strains of E. coli and other bacteria belonging to these six serogroups do not possess the necessary pathogenicity genes, traditional antibody-based tests such as lateral flows or enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays will inaccurately detect many non-Top STEC organisms. Similarly, because there are over 200 other serotypes of E. coli that contain the eae and/or stx genes, genetic-based methods that target only these genes are subject to inaccuracy, resulting in a high rate of false-positive results. These false positives would have to be sorted out either with a series of secondary genetic tests for the O-group genes or through labor-intensive traditional culture methods.

Detection methods that combine both immunological and genetic technologies can greatly increase the specificity and accuracy of Top STEC detection. The Assurance GDS® pathogen detection system from BioControl Systems, Inc. incorporates a proprietary PickPen® immunomagnetic separation (IMS) sample preparation procedure prior to PCR-based detection of the gene targets. The PickPen procedure captures and isolates bacteria belonging to the target serogroups. As such, the downstream reaction for detection of the target pathogenicity genes is performed on a unique subset of organisms that belong only to the serogroups of concern.

A Building-block Approach to STEC Testing
The unparalleled collection of Assurance GDS STEC assays provides food processors with the building blocks necessary to assemble a comprehensive and cost-effective STEC testing program. The new Assurance GDS MPX Top 7 STEC assay provides definitive positive/negative results for both E. coli O157:H7 and Top STEC in just 12 hours. Following enrichment and IMS capture of the top seven serogroups, including O157, the Top STEC results are based on the presence of the eae, stx1 and stx2 genes, while the E. coli O157:H7 result is based on the same proven gene target found in the Assurance GDS E. coli O157:H7 kit, utilized extensively throughout the industry.

For organizations that want to maintain a separate E. coli O157:H7 testing strategy, the Assurance GDS MPX Top 6 STEC assay captures the top six non-O157 serogroups and then provides a definitive result based on the eae, stx1 and stx2 genes. Still more flexibility can be had with the Assurance GDS Top STEC (eae) and Assurance GDS Shiga Toxin Gene assays. Both are available with either Top 6 or Top 7 serogroup IMS capture options, allowing users to implement a sequential approach to testing that provides Shiga toxin gene results for only those samples already determined to be positive for eae. The extensive collection of Assurance GDS STEC assays allows organizations to assemble custom testing strategies to fit their specific food safety program needs for the detection and confirmation of E. coli O157:H7 and the six non-O157 serogroups of STEC.

The Assurance GDS pathogen detection system includes a comprehensive offering of assays for detection of the major foodborne pathogens, including Top STEC, E. coli O157:H7, Shiga toxin genes, Salmonella, Listeria spp., Listeria monocytogenes and Cronobacter spp. The system is internationally recognized and accepted based on its extensive third-party validations and approvals from organizations such as AOAC, AFNOR, NordVal, Health Canada and the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture. The flexible, easy-to-run assays provide the fast and accurate results food processors and testing labs require to both affordably and economically ensure the safety and integrity of their products.

For more information regarding Assurance GDS, contact BioControl Systems at 800.245.0113 or visit the website at biocontrolsys.com

>
Author(s): BioControl Systems

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

Share This Story

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Contamination Control
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Training
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Best Practices
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to Newsletters
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Darkling Beetle
    Sponsored byElanco Animal Health

    Integrated Pest Management: Protecting Poultry Operations as Seasons Change

  • NEVIFIT 3 Compartment BPA-FREE
    Sponsored byCorbion

    The Risks of Ready-to-Eat: Five Ways to Protect Today's Prepared Meals

  • a group of workers in a food production facility
    Sponsored bySkillUp by Registrar Corp

    How to Build a Better Training Program: Data and Insights from the Global Food Safety Training Survey

Popular Stories

half full baby bottle next to rubber duckie on white surface

Organic Infant Formulas Caused Back-to-Back Botulism Outbreaks—What Gives?

June26 eBook Cover

eBook | Building a Skilled and Capable Workforce in the Food Industry

alfalfa sprouted seeds

Salmonella-Tainted Alfalfa Sprouts Sicken 109 People in 11 European Countries, One Death Reported

building a skilled workforce ebook

Events

June 30, 2026

FSMA 204 in Practice: Building a Traceability-Ready Operation

Live: June 30, 2026 at 11:00 am EDT: Attend this webinar to learn how food businesses can move from fragmented records toward a more reliable approach for recall response, FDA requests, and supply chain visibility.

July 21, 2026

Using AI Responsibly in Food Safety Management Systems

Live: July 21, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: This webinar will provide participants with guidance on how to effectively use generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools to develop key components of a food safety management system (FSMS).

August 6, 2026

Beyond Sanitation: Understanding the Hidden System Conditions That Allow Pathogens to Persist

Live: August 6, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Attend this webinar to learn strategies for strengthening environmental control programs through a layered approach to pathogen management.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • FDA to Pause Non-Toxigenic E. coli Raw Milk Cheese Testing Until Further Review

    See More
  • FSM podcast

    MilliporeSigma: The Importance of E. coli and STEC Testing to Food Safety

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 1119053595.jpg

    Food Safety for the 21st Century: Managing HACCP and Food Safety throughout the Global Supply Chain, 2E

  • 1119258073.jpg

    FSMA and Food Safety Systems: Understanding and Implementing the Rules

  • 1444333348.jpg

    Handbook of Food Safety Engineering

See More Products

Related Directories

  • Anritsu - Product Inspection & Detection

    Anritsu manufactures product inspection and detection equipment for food and pharma industries. Part of the Product Quality Assurance division of Anritsu Corp., we advance quality control programs with high-performing and reliable solutions. Our X-Ray Systems, Checkweighers, Metal Detectors, Combo Systems, Rejectors, and QuiCCA Software provide a superior ROI and ensure compliance with stringent quality control programs while protecting your brand. Our local branches in the US, Europe, Brazil, and Mexico are equipped with in-house service & parts dept., we deliver, install, and maintain in record time. With over 200,000 installations, we are the brand that is trusted to protect the safety and security of your customers.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing