Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin instagram youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • NEWSLETTERS >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!

The Challenges of Shiga Toxigenic E. coli (STEC) Detection

October 1, 2011

The potential public health risk of the non-O157 Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) continues to top the list of concerns for many food safety professionals. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) introduced its first internal method for detection and isolation of the top six non-O157 STEC in October 2010. More recently, in a special session at the International Association of Food Protection meeting in Milwaukee earlier this year, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack indicated that the USDA is moving forward with plans to develop regulations pertaining to these top STEC in food as early as spring 2012. In the meantime, several leading food companies announced plans to implement testing programs for the top six non-O157 STEC in addition to their existing E. coli O157:H7 testing efforts. However, accurate detection of this group of organisms represents a new and unique challenge to the food industry.

The Rapid Method Dilemma
The top six non-O157 STEC (Top STEC) have been defined by USDA FSIS as E. coli belonging to serogroups O26, O111, O103, O121, O145 or O45 and possessing both the eae gene and either the stx1 or stx2 genes. Because this definition includes both an immunological component of the O-antigen and a genetic component of specific pathogenicity genes, rapid methods employing only a single detection technology will generate a high frequency of false positives. Because many strains of E. coli and other bacteria belonging to these six serogroups do not possess the necessary pathogenicity genes, traditional antibody-based tests such as lateral flows or enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays will inaccurately detect many non-Top STEC organisms. Similarly, because there are over 200 other serotypes of E. coli that contain the eae and/or stx genes, genetic-based methods that target only these genes are subject to inaccuracy, resulting in a high rate of false-positive results. These false positives would have to be sorted out either with a series of secondary genetic tests for the O-group genes or through labor-intensive traditional culture methods.

Detection methods that combine both immunological and genetic technologies can greatly increase the specificity and accuracy of Top STEC detection. The Assurance GDS® pathogen detection system from BioControl Systems, Inc. incorporates a proprietary PickPen® immunomagnetic separation (IMS) sample preparation procedure prior to PCR-based detection of the gene targets. The PickPen procedure captures and isolates bacteria belonging to the target serogroups. As such, the downstream reaction for detection of the target pathogenicity genes is performed on a unique subset of organisms that belong only to the serogroups of concern.

A Building-block Approach to STEC Testing
The unparalleled collection of Assurance GDS STEC assays provides food processors with the building blocks necessary to assemble a comprehensive and cost-effective STEC testing program. The new Assurance GDS MPX Top 7 STEC assay provides definitive positive/negative results for both E. coli O157:H7 and Top STEC in just 12 hours. Following enrichment and IMS capture of the top seven serogroups, including O157, the Top STEC results are based on the presence of the eae, stx1 and stx2 genes, while the E. coli O157:H7 result is based on the same proven gene target found in the Assurance GDS E. coli O157:H7 kit, utilized extensively throughout the industry.

For organizations that want to maintain a separate E. coli O157:H7 testing strategy, the Assurance GDS MPX Top 6 STEC assay captures the top six non-O157 serogroups and then provides a definitive result based on the eae, stx1 and stx2 genes. Still more flexibility can be had with the Assurance GDS Top STEC (eae) and Assurance GDS Shiga Toxin Gene assays. Both are available with either Top 6 or Top 7 serogroup IMS capture options, allowing users to implement a sequential approach to testing that provides Shiga toxin gene results for only those samples already determined to be positive for eae. The extensive collection of Assurance GDS STEC assays allows organizations to assemble custom testing strategies to fit their specific food safety program needs for the detection and confirmation of E. coli O157:H7 and the six non-O157 serogroups of STEC.

The Assurance GDS pathogen detection system includes a comprehensive offering of assays for detection of the major foodborne pathogens, including Top STEC, E. coli O157:H7, Shiga toxin genes, Salmonella, Listeria spp., Listeria monocytogenes and Cronobacter spp. The system is internationally recognized and accepted based on its extensive third-party validations and approvals from organizations such as AOAC, AFNOR, NordVal, Health Canada and the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture. The flexible, easy-to-run assays provide the fast and accurate results food processors and testing labs require to both affordably and economically ensure the safety and integrity of their products.

For more information regarding Assurance GDS, contact BioControl Systems at 800.245.0113 or visit the website at biocontrolsys.com

>
Author(s): BioControl Systems

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

Share This Story

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Methods
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Sanitation
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Contamination Control
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to Newsletters
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • This image displays a multi-stage water filtration system designed to remove contaminants from drinking water.
    Sponsored byWaterdrop Filter

    The 4.0 ppt Era: Future-Proofing Your Food Supply Chain Against "Forever Chemicals"

  • The image displays a bottling plant production line, commonly used in the beverage industry for filling and packaging soft drinks.
    Sponsored byBIOIONIX

    Sustainability with ROI: A Beverage Producer Case Study in Water Savings

  • factory
    Sponsored byIFC

    A Clean Break to Reset the Environment with Chlorine Dioxide

Popular Stories

recalled Pâté en Croûte products from France

Fatal Listeriosis Outbreak in France Linked to RTE Meats

magnifying glass hovering over question mark on yellow background

FDA Redacts All Key Details in Summary of Fatal Listeriosis Outbreak Linked to Produce

FoodSafetyMattersFinal-900x550-(002).jpg

Ep. 213. Richard Stier: Driving Continuous Improvement in Food Safety and Sanitation

Events

March 26, 2026

Continuous Pathogen Control: Enhancing Sanitation and Environmental Monitoring in Food Processing

Live: March 26, 2026, at 2:00 pm EST: This session explores the role of continuous airborne pathogen control technology in supporting sanitation and environmental monitoring programs within food processing environments.

March 31, 2026

Regulatory Risk, Ingredient Safety, and GRAS: What Companies Need to Act on Now

Live: March 31, 2026, at 11:00 am EDT: From this webinar, attendees will recognize patterns in food policy affecting dietary guidelines, UPFs, state legislative actions, and expected GRAS reform.

April 8, 2026

Foreign Material Contamination: Why In-Line Reinspection Isn't Enough

Live: April 8, 2026, at 11:00 am EDT: From this webinar, attendees will learn why reinspecting with in-line equipment is not sufficient when it comes to potential foreign material contamination.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • FSM podcast

    MilliporeSigma: The Importance of E. coli and STEC Testing to Food Safety

    See More
  • Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (STEC): Microorganisms of Public Health Significance in Meat and Poultry

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 1119053595.jpg

    Food Safety for the 21st Century: Managing HACCP and Food Safety throughout the Global Supply Chain, 2E

  • 1119258073.jpg

    FSMA and Food Safety Systems: Understanding and Implementing the Rules

  • 1444333348.jpg

    Handbook of Food Safety Engineering

See More Products

Related Directories

  • Anritsu - Product Inspection & Detection

    Anritsu manufactures product inspection and detection equipment for food and pharma industries. Part of the Product Quality Assurance division of Anritsu Corp., we advance quality control programs with high-performing and reliable solutions. Our X-Ray Systems, Checkweighers, Metal Detectors, Combo Systems, Rejectors, and QuiCCA Software provide a superior ROI and ensure compliance with stringent quality control programs while protecting your brand. Our local branches in the US, Europe, Brazil, and Mexico are equipped with in-house service & parts dept., we deliver, install, and maintain in record time. With over 200,000 installations, we are the brand that is trusted to protect the safety and security of your customers.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing