Food Safety
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • ENEWSLETTER >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
ManagementRegulatoryRisk AssessmentGuidelines

Verifying Nutrition and Safety Benefits may Increase Consumer Acceptance of GM and Nanotech Foods

March 17, 2015

Interest in food produced using novel technologies like genetic modification (GM) and nanotechnology continues to rise both domestically and internationally. North Carolina State University and the University of Minnesota have recently published research that suggests the majority of U.S. consumers base their decisions about genetically modified and nanotech food on whether the technologies offer improvements to the nutrition or safety of food. The paper, “Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences for Nanotechnology and Genetic-modification Technology in Food Products,” was published and can be found online in the Journal of Agricultural Economics.

This study investigated consumer preferences for rice, testing the “technology attributes” of rice enhanced with nanotechnology, GM or conventional breeding. The general benefits selected for investigation were enhanced nutrition, enhanced taste, enhanced food safety and less harmful effects on the environment. Participants were presented with a series of choice scenarios regarding a 32-oz bag of long grain white rice, which consisted of varied combinations of product attributes.

The study identified four estimated classes of participants. A fraction (17.64 percent) of the sample were named “Price Oriented/Technology Adopters,” in which participants are the most sensitive to change in price and base their decisions off of this factor regardless of the presence of either technology. The “Technology Averse” group consisted of 17.2 percent of the sample, and participants in this group will accept genetically modified or nanotech foods only if they disclose food safety benefits. The majority segment, which makes up 40.3 percent of the segment, were “Benefit Oriented,” indicating that participants in this group are willing to accept the technology used during production as long as certain benefits can be brought by it. The “New Technology Rejecters” make up 24.9 percent of the sample, and participants in this group reject nanotechnology or GM regardless of the associated benefits and prices whenever there is a conventional option.

Senior author of the paper and co-director of North Carolina State University’s Genetic Engineering and Society Center Jennifer Kuzma says, “This tells us that GM or nanotech food products have greater potential to be viable in the marketplace if companies focus on developing products that have safety and nutrition benefits—because a majority of consumers would be willing to buy those products.”

As a whole, while neither genetically modified nor nanotech foods are popular with consumers, nanotechnology is more acceptable than GM across all groups of participants and benefits. Safety benefits were most accepted, followed by nutrition, taste and the environment.

This research suggests several implications for the industry. First, labeling genetically modified and nanotech foods either through voluntary or mandatory initiatives may be a beneficial product development strategy in order to allow “technology-rejecters” to make their own decisions. Further, claims of enhanced quality and safety through genetically modified and nanotech foods should be verified in order to increase acceptance amongst consumers who are somewhat open to the technologies.

Alyssa Rudisill is a communications technical assistant in the Center on Genetic Engineering and Society at North Carolina State University.

>
Author(s): Alyssa Rudisill

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Meat/Poultry
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Management
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Best Practices
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to eNewsletter
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Two men standing in a produce storage facility having a discussion.
    Sponsored byOrkin Commercial

    Staying Compliant With FSMA

  • Deli Salads
    Sponsored byCorbion

    How Food Safety is Becoming the Ultimate Differentiator in Refrigerated and Prepared Foods

Popular Stories

Corporate manager talking with factory employees

Turning Resistance into Opportunity: Motivating Change in the Food Industry

Image of baby being fed infant formula

HHS Budget Request Beats Familiar Drum

Two men standing in a produce storage facility having a discussion.

Staying Compliant With FSMA

Events

June 26, 2025

How to Design and Conduct Challenge Studies for Safer Products and Longer Shelf Life

Live: June 26, 2025 at 2:00 pm EDT: During this webinar, attendees will learn how to conduct challenge studies for microbial spoilage and pathogen growth, including the common challenges encountered, laboratory selection, and use of predictive models.

July 15, 2025

Hygienic Design Risk Management: Industry Challenges and EHEDG Guidance

Live: July 15, 2025 at 11:00 am EDT: From this webinar, attendees will learn the importance of hygienic design to ensure food safety and sanitation effectiveness.

May 11, 2026

The Food Safety Summit

Stay informed on the latest food safety trends, innovations, emerging challenges, and expert analysis. Leave the Summit with actionable insights ready to drive measurable improvements in your organization. Do not miss this opportunity to learn from experts about contamination control, food safety culture, regulations, sanitation, supply chain traceability, and so much more.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products
Environmental Monitoring Excellence eBook

Related Articles

  • IFSH Receives FDA Acceptance of Pressure Enhanced Sterilization Process for Commercial Production of MultiComponent Shelf-Stable Foods

    See More
  • HPP

    Universal Pure Survey: Food safety helps drive increase of HPP

    See More
  • Arla Foods Mimica Touch

    Arla Foods begins consumer testing of packaging to help reduce food waste

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • food-safety-making.jpg

    Food Safety: Making Foods Safe and Free From Pathogens

  • 9781498721776.jpg

    Handbook of Food Processing: Food Safety, Quality, and Manufacturing Processes

  • 1444333348.jpg

    Handbook of Food Safety Engineering

See More Products

Related Directories

  • Saldesia "Goddess of Food Safety"

    Saldesia is a distributor of Food Safety products and solutions. We are focused on supplying the Quality, Production, Safety and Sanitation departments. Product lines include Color Coded, Metal Detectable, Antimicrobial Flooring & Mats, Workwear, Footwear, Spray Nozzles, and more!
  • Kerry

    Kerry is the world’s leading taste and nutrition partner for the food and beverage industry. We innovate with our customers to create delicious products with improved nutrition, functionality and sustainability. Our consumer insights, RD&A team and extensive global footprint enable us to solve food safety challenges with differentiated solutions.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

eNewsletter | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing