Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin instagram youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • Sponsored Insights
    • Sponsored White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • NEWSLETTERS >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
Testing & AnalysisChemical Testing & Analysis

Multiresidue Pesticide Analysis in Food and Agricultural Samples

August 1, 2009

The analysis of pesticide residues in food samples is increasingly becoming an important technique. Most pesticides are designed to kill pests. However, many pesticides can also pose risks to people. The health effects of pesticides depend on the type of pesticide. Some, such as organophosphates and carbamates, affect the nervous system. Others can irritate the skin or eyes. Some pesticides may be carcinogenic.

Many food samples contain a range of pesticides. This number can sometimes be in the hundreds. As a result, most analytical techniques are not geared towards measuring a single pesticide. Most analytical laboratories will be performing multi-residue methods to detect a large number of pesticides in a single sample. These pesticides can be acidic, basic and neutral, and the sample matrix may contain components such as lipids, sterols, etc.

As the sample matrix can contain interferences, sample preparation is needed prior to injection into the chromatography system. Due to increasing throughput requirements and cost pressures, a multi-residue method should meet the following criteria:

•    Fast to perform — Use as few process steps as possible
•    Easy to execute — Avoid laborious process steps such as evaporation/reconstitution
•    Use a minimum amount of solvents and sorbents — Reduce costs and environmental impact

Many multi-residue methods involve lengthy steps, such as multiple separations. This can lead to the likelihood of greater error in the final analysis. By minimizing the number of steps, greater accuracy in results and a greater throughput of samples can be achieved.

In 2003, Anastassiades and Lehotay developed a way to simplify multi-residue pesticide analysis, leading to a technique that is simple, quick to perform and inexpensive, but still gives excellent results. This technique was named QuEChERS, an acronym for Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe. This technique is increasingly becoming the method of choice for multi-residue pesticide analysis in food samples. The QuEChERS technique is:

•    Quick – Sample throughput is high and it can detect a range of pesticides in a single extraction
•    Easy – No need for automation during the process and laborious process steps are eliminated
•    Cheap – It uses less sorbent and solvent than other multi-residue methods
•    Effective – It gives high recoveries and accurate results for a range of pesticide types
•    Rugged – It can detect a range of pesticide types, such as polar compounds and pH-dependent compounds
•    Safe – The technique does not use chlorinated solvents; extraction is typically carried out using acetonitrile (this is LC- and GC-amenable)

This method is a sample preparation technique using solvent extraction of high-moisture samples with acetonitrile, ethyl acetate or acetone and partitioning with magnesium sulfate alone or in combination with other salts, followed by sample clean-up using a dispersive solid-phase extraction (SPE) technique.

The first step (sample extraction) involves adding a homogenized food sample to a 50-ml centrifuge tube containing magnesium sulfate and a salt such as sodium chloride or sodium acetate. Upon addition of acetonitrile and extensive shaking and centrifugation of the tube, the MgSO4 induces a phase separation between the acetonitrile and water layers. The compounds of interest transfer into the acetonitrile layer.

A portion of this acetonitrile layer is next transferred to a clean-up tube. This tube is typically 2 or 15 ml in volume and contains a combination of sorbent materials in different amounts. Magnesium sulfate is present to remove any excess water from the sample. Primary/secondary amine (PSA) is used for the removal of organic acids and polar pigments, while endcapped C18 is used for lipid and sterol removal. Graphatized carbon block is used if substances such as chlorophyll are present and may break down during analysis.

Selection of the most appropriate product is determined by the following parameters:

•    Starting sample matrix
•    Sample volume
•    AOAC/EPA method followed (if applicable)

Following sample extraction and clean-up, a portion of the sample can then be injected directly onto an LC or GC system without any need for evaporation, reconstitution or derivatization.

This technique was initially developed for analysis of fruit and vegetable products. However, research has shown that it can be successfully utilized with other matrices such as milk, honey and rice. The technique has also been used to investigate non-pesticide food toxins, such as acrylamide in various food matrices. It is increasingly being utilized in food safety laboratories around the world and is anticipated to grow in popularity over the coming years. In addition, Thermo Scientific HyperSep Dispersive SPE products contain the proper sorbents for optimum extraction, clean-up and separation of analytes from complex matrices such as food products.

www.thermo.com/columns

 

>
Author(s): Thermo Scientific

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

Share This Story

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Contamination Control
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Training
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Risk Assessment
    By: Shamini Albert Raj M.A. and Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to Newsletters
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • an automated industrial production line used in a modern food factory
    Sponsored byIFC

    A Formula for Food Processing Pest Management

  • fly
    Sponsored byOrkin Commercial

    Fly Control in Food Processing Facilities: Managing Seasonal Food Safety Risks

  • Darkling Beetle
    Sponsored byElanco Animal Health

    Integrated Pest Management: Protecting Poultry Operations as Seasons Change

Popular Stories

Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts

Foodborne Parasite Cyclospora Sickens Thousands Across U.S.

Cyclospora cayetanensis oocyst

Cyclospora Cases Climb, But Actual Number Unclear as CDC Reporting Lags Behind States

UN building in geneva

Codex Publishes Strategic Plan for 2026–2031

building a skilled workforce ebook

Events

July 21, 2026

Using AI Responsibly in Food Safety Management Systems

Live: July 21, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: This webinar will provide participants with guidance on how to effectively use generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools to develop key components of a food safety management system (FSMS).

August 6, 2026

Beyond Sanitation: Understanding the Hidden System Conditions That Allow Pathogens to Persist

Live: August 6, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Attend this webinar to learn strategies for strengthening environmental control programs through a layered approach to pathogen management.

August 11, 2026

Beyond Sanitization: Reducing Contamination Risk Without Raising Operating Cost

Live: August 11, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Attend this webinar to learn why ambient air is the largest and most overlooked contamination zone in food processing, and what it costs you between scheduled cleans.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • Powering Productivity in Pesticide Analysis

    See More
  • Multiresidue Analysis of 301 Pesticides in Food Samples by LC/Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 9781138070912.jpg

    Trends in Food Safety and Protection

  • 1118396308.jpg

    High Throughput Analysis for Food Safety

  • 1119237963.jpg

    Food Safety in China: Science, Technology, Management and Regulation

See More Products

Related Directories

  • North American Chemical Residue Workshop

    NACRW) formerly the Florida Pesticide Residue Workshop conducts an annual meeting for scientists particularly interested in trace level analysis of pesticides, veterinary drug residues, and other chemicals in food, animal feed, and environmental samples. The purpose of the meeting is to provide training, develop and improve technical knowledge, facilitate development and distribution of new analysis methods and techniques, and establish networking to promote professional cooperation between scientists of these interests.
  • QualiTru Sampling Systems

    Since 1983, QualiTru Sampling Systems® (formerly QMI) has been the leader in the science of aseptic liquid sampling with innovative, easy-to-use, versatile and cost‑effective sampling systems that help the dairy, beverage and liquid food industries produce safe, quality products across the U.S. and in over 30 countries worldwide.
  • Food Radar Systems in Sweden AB

    Food Radar Systems, based in Sweden, develops microwave technology that detects and rejects low-density foreign bodies in pumpable food products, helping food manufacturers improve safety, protect consumers, and strengthen quality assurance in modern production environments.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing