Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin instagram youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • Sponsored Insights
    • Sponsored White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • NEWSLETTERS >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
Contamination ControlTesting & AnalysisMicrobiological ControlMicrobiological Testing & Analysis

The Move Toward Molecular Methods for Salmonella Detection

October 1, 2012

Rapid Salmonella detection technologies have continued to evolve in an effort to provide food producers and testing labs with the required improvements to specificity, sensitivity and speed. Many of these advancements utilize molecular-based detection technologies such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or other enzyme-mediated nucleic acid amplification techniques. Molecular detection technologies offer distinct advantages over the older antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, enzyme-linked fluorescent assays or lateral flow technologies. The latter generally requires longer, more complex enrichment schemes and are more prone to false-positive results caused by cross-reacting enterics, such as Citrobacter. The new molecular methods possess their own set of unique challenges.

The Challenges of Food Samples
Molecular methods typically provide superior sensitivity and specificity compared to antibody methods and normally have shortened enrichment procedures. Often times, the sample-to-media ratio is reduced below the traditional 1 part sample to 9 parts media (i.e., 25 g in 225 mL) as well. These modifications offer cost and labor reductions but result in an increased potential for the sample matrix to interfere with the detection technology. Food and environmental surface samples often contain sub-stances that can inhibit molecular detection in a variety of ways, including inactivation of the polymerase enzyme, degradation of the nucleic acids or interference with the optical signal. Examples of common inhibitors include phenolic compounds found in chocolate and berries, certain polysaccharides found in plants, calcium ions in milk, proteinase enzymes produced by microorganisms in the sample, enrichment media components such as bile salts and acriflavine, colored samples such as spices or produce, and antimicrobial chemicals used as interventions during processing.

Why Sample Preparation Is Critical
The goal of an enrichment procedure is to ensure that Salmonella, if present, is grown to a detectable level. Equally important is the sample preparation procedure used to prepare the enriched sample for analysis. This step must ensure that inhibitory substances are removed from the sample in a way that does not reduce the level of the target pathogen. Many molecular detection technologies rely on a dilution step in which a portion of the enriched sample is transferred to a buffer solution in preparation for a heat or chemical lysis step that functions to release the targeted nucleic acid material from the cells. However, this dilution approach counteracts the enrichment process, dilutes Salmonella and reduces the method’s sensitivity. In contrast, Assurance GDS® Salmonella from BioControl incorporates a proprietary immunomagnetic separation technology that utilizes antibody-coated magnetic particles to capture and concentrate any Salmonella in the enriched sample. These particles, with the captured Salmonella, are physically removed from the enrichment and transferred to the PCR tubes for analysis. This simple and effective process takes less than 20 minutes for 72 samples and helps ensure that the reaction proceeds uninhibited without compromising sensitivity.

Negative or False Negative?
Any molecular detection assay should contain an internal control (IC) in each reaction. Because molecular technologies are susceptible to interference or inhibition, it is crucial that a Salmonella detection method can verify that a negative test result is due to the absence of Salmonella and not a failed reaction. As each sample represents its own unique set of conditions, an assay control that is separate from the sample does not provide sufficient information to verify the negative result. Each Assurance GDS Salmonella Amplification Tube contains an IC that consists of a unique sequence of DNA with its own specific primers and probe. Amplification of this IC must occur to ensure that the PCR process has not been inhibited in each tube in order for the corresponding negative test result to be determined valid by the Assurance GDS Rotor-Gene® Software. Without the presence of an IC in each reaction, any negative test result could be the result of a failed reaction and could, in reality, be a false-negative result.

An Ideal Solution for Rapid Salmonella Detection
A rapid Salmonella detection method should also fit the lab’s workflow and produce results quickly and efficiently. The new 72 sample high-throughput option for Assurance GDS can provide results for 400 samples in a single 8-hour shift, more than twice the capacity of other molecular methods. Salmonella results are available in just 20 hours for most samples and as fast as 10 hours for certain matrices with a dual enrichment method for Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7.

For more information contact BioControl Systems at 800.245.0113 or visit biocontrolsys.com

>
Author(s): BioControl Systems

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

Share This Story

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Meat/Poultry
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Training
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    International
    By: Shamini Albert Raj M.A. and Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to Newsletters
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • an automated industrial production line used in a modern food factory
    Sponsored byIFC

    A Formula for Food Processing Pest Management

  • fly
    Sponsored byOrkin Commercial

    Fly Control in Food Processing Facilities: Managing Seasonal Food Safety Risks

  • Darkling Beetle
    Sponsored byElanco Animal Health

    Integrated Pest Management: Protecting Poultry Operations as Seasons Change

Popular Stories

Cyclospora cayetanensis oocyst

Cyclospora Cases Climb, But Actual Number Unclear as CDC Reporting Lags Behind States

UN building in geneva

Codex Publishes Strategic Plan for 2026–2031

spoon of whitish brown sweetener

JECFA Evaluates Safety of Certain Food Additives; Monk Fruit Presents Potential Concern

building a skilled workforce ebook

Events

July 21, 2026

Using AI Responsibly in Food Safety Management Systems

Live: July 21, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: This webinar will provide participants with guidance on how to effectively use generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools to develop key components of a food safety management system (FSMS).

August 6, 2026

Beyond Sanitation: Understanding the Hidden System Conditions That Allow Pathogens to Persist

Live: August 6, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Attend this webinar to learn strategies for strengthening environmental control programs through a layered approach to pathogen management.

August 11, 2026

Beyond Sanitization: Reducing Contamination Risk Without Raising Operating Cost

Live: August 11, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Attend this webinar to learn why ambient air is the largest and most overlooked contamination zone in food processing, and what it costs you between scheduled cleans.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • DuPont BAX System X5 Certified by AOAC-RI for Salmonella Detection

    See More
  • USDA Approves Clear Labs' Automated NGS Technology Platform for Salmonella Detection

    USDA Approves Clear Labs' Automated NGS Technology Platform for Salmonella Detection

    See More
  • EFSA Evaluates Molecular Typing Methods for Foodborne Pathogens

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • global food.jpg

    Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

  • 1119053595.jpg

    Food Safety for the 21st Century: Managing HACCP and Food Safety throughout the Global Supply Chain, 2E

  • 9781138070912.jpg

    Trends in Food Safety and Protection

See More Products

Related Directories

  • Anritsu - Product Inspection & Detection

    Anritsu manufactures product inspection and detection equipment for food and pharma industries. Part of the Product Quality Assurance division of Anritsu Corp., we advance quality control programs with high-performing and reliable solutions. Our X-Ray Systems, Checkweighers, Metal Detectors, Combo Systems, Rejectors, and QuiCCA Software provide a superior ROI and ensure compliance with stringent quality control programs while protecting your brand. Our local branches in the US, Europe, Brazil, and Mexico are equipped with in-house service & parts dept., we deliver, install, and maintain in record time. With over 200,000 installations, we are the brand that is trusted to protect the safety and security of your customers.
  • Magnets for Sensors

    Magnets for Sensors provides high quality magnetic components, sensors, and related contamination control solutions for the food safety and processing industries. We specialize in metal detectable products and robust magnetic separation devices designed to ensure regulatory compliance and product purity in food manufacturing environments.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing