Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • ENEWSLETTER >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
White Papers

Increasing Shelf Life of Injected Meats

February 26, 2013

For centuries, the benefits of enhancing meat flavor and texture with injected brines, marinades and phosphates has been well accepted as a way to add value to customers, while also improving marketability by improving color, texture and shelf life. The modern injection process typically consists of five main components: injector needles, brine or marinade mixing tanks, filters, heat exchanger and saddle tank, all connected in a recirculation loop with sanitary clean-in-place (CIP) piping.

The injection process is inherently susceptible to microbiological challenges in the brine/marinade and equipment components. Therefore, a thorough microbiological testing and sanitation protocol is important to achieve and maintain product quality and integrity.

Brine Dumping
Throughout the course of a processing day, the microbial levels of the injected solution increase as it is recirculated, until it reaches a predetermined level. At this point, the solution must be discarded or “dumped,” and a new batch of solution mixed before continuing production. While this procedure ensures that the injected solution is maintained at safe levels, it does not address the sanitation component of the injection process.

Sanitation of the Injection Loop Components
By its nature, the injection process allows the needles to transfer surface skin pathogens and spoilage bacteria into the muscle tissue. While proper cooking temperatures mitigate the food safety risks associated with this contamination, shelf life of fresh injected product can suffer dramatically as a result. Therefore, it is critical to adopt a thorough cleaning regimen for the injector and its components.

To clean the injectors, a common approach is to use a chlorinated alkaline cleaner recirculated through the system, followed by a water rinse. A vinegar solution is often used to soak the needles overnight. This helps unclog needles by loosening bone, cartilage and fat that has accumulated during the course of the day. The needles are then rinsed and blown out with compressed air.

However, the approach outlined above is often not sufficient to eliminate all spoilage organisms from the injection system.

The Problem: Biofilm
Biofilms are a complex matrix of bacteria, fungi and algae bound together in a sticky gel of polysaccharide and other organic contaminants attached to a surface. Organisms produce a protective, slime-like layer, in which they live, that anchors them firmly to a surface and provides a protective environment to grow and reproduce.[1] Biofilms generally form on any surface that is exposed to water or other liquids. Brine/marinade injection systems are particularly at risk to biofilm buildup due their nutrient enriched make-up. Pathogens in biofilm can be up to 1,000 times more resistant to traditional cleaners, sanitizers and disinfectants as compared to their free floating (planktonic) counterparts living in water based environments.[2]

Given these characteristics, biofilm becomes a natural foe in the injection process. Needles, tubing, CIP piping, heat exchangers and saddle tanks are at risk, and it is not economical to disassemble and hand scrub to remove biofilm. As such, an effective biocidal, biofilm removal technology becomes crucial.

PerQuat® Technology
Sterilex® PerQuat® technology contains synergistic components that lyse open the biofilm structure, kill pathogenic organisms, collapse the biofilm polymer matrix and physically lift the biofilm structure from surfaces.

In 2009, under a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Research Initiative Grant, Judy Arnold of the USDA-Agricultural Research Service Poultry Microbiological Safety Research Unit in Athens, GA conducted a study with multiple compounds to compare their efficacy against resistant biofilm containing Listeria monocytogenes, a foodborne pathogen found in some ready-to-eat-meats. She published a paper entitled “Biofilms Have a New Foil” in which she reported:

“Results showed that the formulation (Sterilex) was 100 percent effective, providing total kill and more than 90 percent biofilm removal. This disinfectant is more effective than currently used disinfectants in reducing L. Monocytogenes biofilm growth, thus minimizing the risk of pathogenic contamination…”[3]

Injector Case Study
To validate the benefits of using PerQuat sanitation chemistries in injection systems, a major U.S. poultry processor conducted a shelf-life study in 2012 using Sterilex Ultra Disinfectant Cleaner & Sterilex Ultra Activator Solution (a liquid PerQuat solution) to treat an injector and components for approximately two weeks, nightly. Baseline samples were collected and compared against samples of raw dark poultry meat after injector treatment with the Sterilex product. Shelf life of meat was determined by looking at both microbiological metrics [aerobic plate counts (APC) and total coliform counts] as well as organoleptic observations. The results are shown below (Tables and Figures; see also sidebar).

Discussion
Control Result: Shelf life of raw dark poultry meat before PerQuat trial: 8 daysMicro Results
From days 3 through 12, dramatic reductions in APC counts and total coliform counts by day were observed. In general, microbiological thresholds were reached 4–5 days later after PerQuat treatment as compared to the control sample, leading to an increase in shelf life.

Trial Result: Shelf life of raw dark poultry meat following PerQuat application 12/13 daysOrganoleptic Results
Organoleptic differences between the two sets of samples were even more dramatic. The pretreatment samples began to emit odors at day 7, while the post treatment samples remained fresh smelling until day twelve.  

APC Control vs PerQuatThe color of the control samples remained normal until day eight, at which time the meat began turning brown in color. Grey spotting was also observed until day 13 when the testing was stopped. There was no discoloration of the treated samples. Color remained normal from day 3 through day 13.

The surface characteristics of the control samples only remained normal until day 7, at which time a slippery coating was observed on all parts. The feel of the treated samples remained normal until day 12.

Conclusions
As observed in this trial, treatment of the injector loop with PerQuat technology on a daily basis for 2 weeks resulted in a 4/5 day extension of shelf life for raw, dark poultry meat. Delays in microbiological thresholds as well as significant improvements in organoleptic properties were seen throughout the trial.

Total Coliform Control vs PerQuatSimilar results may be observed in any plant with a brine injection process by following a similar injector treatment protocol.

References
1. Chmielewski, R.A.N. and J.F. Frank. 2003. Biofilm formation and control in food processing facilities. Comp Rev Food Sci Safety 2:22–30.
2. Jefferson, K.K., D.A. Goldmann and G.B. Pier. 2005. Use of confocal microscopy to analyze the rate of vancomycin penetration through Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49(6):2467–2473.
3. Durham, S. 2009. Biofilms have a new foil. USDA: Agric Res Mag 59(9).

You may contact Sterilex Corporation directly for more information at 800.511.1659 or Sales@Sterilex.com.


Sidebar:
Case Study #1

Type of Needles Used: MEPSCO Ultracat 488
Type of Product Tested: Dark poultry meat (legs and thighs) in packaged bags

Control Treatment of Needles/Lines:
• Needles removed from the injection lines.

• Needles soaked in vinegar solution overnight for 6 hours (Heinz white vinegar undiluted at 5% acidity), then rinsed and blown out with compressed air in the morning.

• Chlorinated alkaline foam cleaner (1.8% active chlorine, 6.9% caustic) recirculated through entire CIP injection loop for 1 hour followed by a thorough water rinse.

Control Sample Shelf Life Observed: 8 days

Sterilex PerQuat Treatment of Needles/Lines:
• Needles remain in place connected to lines.

• Chlorinated caustic foam cleaner (1.8% active chlorine, 6.9% caustic) recirculated through entire CIP injection loop for 1 hour followed by a thorough water rinse.

• Sterilex Ultra Disinfectant Cleaner & Activator Solution NF added to brine tank at a 1:1:10 concentration and circulated through CIP injection loop , filters, heat exchanger, sanitary piping and needles for 1 hour. The brine mixing tank was filled to the 100-gallon mark, and 10 gallons Sterilex Ultra Disinfectant Cleaner NF and 10 gallons Sterilex Ultra Activator Solution were added.

• Lines and needles rinsed thoroughly.

• Needles soaked in vinegar solution overnight for 6 hours (same concentration as above), then rinsed and blown out with compressed air in the morning.

Frequency of Use of Sterilex PerQuat to Needles/Lines:
• Sterilex treatment used daily for 2 weeks for trial. Samples pulled following 2-week shock treatment.

• Ongoing, Sterilex PerQuat treatment applied 1–3× per week following initial shock treatment application.

Sterilex Sample Shelf Life Observed: 13 days


Author(s): Sterilex

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

Share This Story

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Food Type
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Management
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Risk Assessment
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to eNewsletter
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Salmonella bacteria
    Sponsored byThermoFisher

    Food Microbiology Testing Methods: Salmonella species

  • a diagram explaining indicator organisms
    Sponsored byHygiena

    How Proactive Listeria Testing Helps Prevent Six- and Seven-Figure Recalls

  • woman grocery shopping
    Sponsored byCorbion

    Designing Safety Into Every Bite: Proactive Risk Mitigation for Refrigerated Foods

Popular Stories

NRTE breaded stuffed chicken

USDA Indefinitely Delays Enforcement of Salmonella as Adulterant in Raw Breaded, Stuffed Chicken

spoonfuls of food ingredients

FDA’s Developing Rule to Tighten GRAS Oversight Moves to White House

non-conforming product

How to Handle Non-Conforming Product

Events

December 11, 2025

How to Develop and Implement an Effective Food Defense Strategy

Live: December 11, 2025 at 2:00 pm EDT: From this webinar, attendees will learn common areas where companies encounter challenges in their food defense strategies and how to address them.

May 11, 2026

The Food Safety Summit

Stay informed on the latest food safety trends, innovations, emerging challenges, and expert analysis. Leave the Summit with actionable insights ready to drive measurable improvements in your organization. Do not miss this opportunity to learn from experts about contamination control, food safety culture, regulations, sanitation, supply chain traceability, and so much more.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • The Evaluation of Novel Antimicrobial Ingredients in Maintaining the Safety and Shelf-Life of Refrigerated Foods

    See More
  • grape packaging

    Packaging solution extends shelf life of grapes

    See More
  • New Non-Destructive Leak Detection Technology from INFICON Helps Enhance Food Safety, Extend Shelf Life of Dry Food Products

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • shelf life.jpg

    Shelf Life and Food Safety

  • 9781498721776.jpg

    Handbook of Food Processing: Food Safety, Quality, and Manufacturing Processes

  • 1444333348.jpg

    Handbook of Food Safety Engineering

See More Products

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • June 26, 2025

    How to Design and Conduct Challenge Studies for Safer Products and Longer Shelf Life

    On Demand: During this webinar, attendees will learn how to conduct challenge studies for microbial spoilage and pathogen growth, including the common challenges encountered, laboratory selection, and use of predictive models.
View AllSubmit An Event

Related Directories

  • Zoecon / Central Life Sciences

    Zoëcon Professional Products has been providing unique solutions for insect control for more than 50 years. In that time, it’s built a rich history and developed a complete product line to serve PMPs in a wide range of protocols, all from the creation of the original insect growth regulator.
  • Pick Heaters Inc.

    Throughout the food plant, from process heating to plant sanitation, Pick Steam Injection Heaters provide instant, unlimited hot water at a precise temperature. When compared to indirect heat exchangers, Pick can cut energy costs. Higher processing efficiency, lower energy costs and increased safety are but a few of the benefits.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

eNewsletter | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing