Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin instagram youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Sponsored White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • NEWSLETTERS >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
Supply ChainTesting & AnalysisMicrobiological Testing & AnalysisTransportation

Can Shipping Conditions Influence Your Listeria Test Results?

June 1, 2005

Environmental Listeria sampling is popular among food manufacturers because it greatly reduces the time and cost associated with end-product testing for the pathogen Listeria monocyto- genes. It also provides valuable information for determining how and where the contaminant is entering the food processing line. A December 2004 report by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA FSIS) documenting the impact of the interim final rule for Listeria testing in ready-to-eat (RTE) meat and poultry production facilities found that “…plants have either initiated or greatly increased their testing for Listeria or Listeria-like organisms on plant surfaces that come in contact with products after cooking.” [1]

Increasingly, environmental samples are being shipped from plants to off-site laboratories that offer rapid, accurate testing methods, such as the DNA-based BAX® detection system (www.qualicon.com). Many large food manufacturers have switched from on-site to centralized labs and there is growing use of contract service labs by small food processors. The demand for more rapid methods and the overall increase in testing are also contributing factors.

Although much has been written about proper collection and testing techniques, little attention has been focused on the impact of shipping conditions on the recovery of pathogens. In a study presented at the 2004 AOAC annual meeting, Michael C. Bazaco reported that shipping environmental samples on ice resulted in stress and eventual death of Listeria cells.[2] This can potentially lead to an increased number of false-negative results, especially for testing methods with lower sensitivity, such as immunoassays. Although the sensitivity of the DNA-based BAX® system allows for greater reliability, DuPont Qualicon scientists wanted to determine the best way to protect enrichments so that Listeria would not be stressed—even under worst-case scenario conditions. They conducted a study to investigate the effects of overnight shipping conditions on environmental samples inoculated with Listeria.

Based on information from a major overnight shipping company, the harshest conditions that samples could reasonably expect to encounter during transport were determined to be temperatures of 55°C during summer months, for periods of up to one hour on a regular basis while loading and up to four hours in the event of mechanical problems with the plane. After takeoff, the temperature in shipping containers rapidly returns to a much lower temperature, but after landing, the temperature of the shipping containers could again spike for a half hour or more while the trucks are being loaded.
For this study, three sets of enrichments were set up as follows:

1. A set of sponges hydrated with Dey/Engley (D/E) neutralizing broth were inoculated in triplicate with four levels of two Listeria strains (L. innocua and L. monocytogenes), and then placed into 35 mL of BAX® system media for Listeria. The enrichments were placed in a cooler (typically used to transport reagents) with six room-temperature ice packs and a thermometer. The cooler was sealed with tape inside a cardboard box and placed inside an incubator set at 55°C for 4.5 hours to simulate heat abuse during shipping. An additional thermometer was placed in the incubator, outside the cooler.

Following high-temperature incubation, the cooler was placed on a lab bench for 14 hours, then opened and placed in a 37°C incubator for 26 hours. Readouts from the thermometer inside the cooler showed a maximum reading of 39.2°C. The enrichments were then tested with the BAX® system. Following another 24 hours of incubation, the enrichments were plated onto MOX plates for culture-based confirmation.

2. The second set of enrichments was set up under the same conditions, with two exceptions. First, frozen ice packs, which are the current standard industry practice for shipping enrichments, were substituted for the room-temperature ice packs. Second, the cooler was placed on a lab bench for 18.5 hours (vs. 14 hours) before being opened.

3. For the third set of enrichments, sponges were inoculated as above, but not placed in a cooler. Instead, samples sat at room temperature on a lab bench for 14.5 hours before being placed in a 37°C incubator for 26 hours. The enrichments were then tested by the BAX® system and plated for confirmation.

Results showed that enrichments packed with room-temperature ice packs (set #1) and those held at room temperature (set #3) showed fewer false-negative results at all levels than those packed with frozen ice packs (set #2).

These results are significant because they show that the current industry practice of shipping samples overnight with frozen ice packs is not the best method. Instead, shipping with room-temperature ice packs, which have less impact on Listeria growth rates, reduces potential problems with false-negative results. The use of sensitive testing methods, such as the BAX® system, coupled with selective enrichment media specifically designed to maintain accuracy and improve time-to-result, are important steps that food manufacturers can take to ensure the most value from rapid testing methods.

www.qualicon.com

References
1. Cohen, S. “Report Finds Listeria Rule Sparks Major Industry Changes.” News release, Dec. 1, 2004. www.fsis.usda.gov.
2. Bazaco, M.C. “Quantitative recovery of L. monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica from environmental sampling media.” Thesis submitted, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Dec. 13, 2004.

>
Author(s): Qualicon

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

Share This Story

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Meat/Poultry
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Personal Hygiene/Handwashing
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Best Practices
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to Newsletters
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Darkling Beetle
    Sponsored byElanco Animal Health

    Integrated Pest Management: Protecting Poultry Operations as Seasons Change

  • NEVIFIT 3 Compartment BPA-FREE
    Sponsored byCorbion

    The Risks of Ready-to-Eat: Five Ways to Protect Today's Prepared Meals

  • a group of workers in a food production facility
    Sponsored bySkillUp by Registrar Corp

    How to Build a Better Training Program: Data and Insights from the Global Food Safety Training Survey

Popular Stories

half full baby bottle next to rubber duckie on white surface

Organic Infant Formulas Caused Back-to-Back Botulism Outbreaks—What Gives?

June26 eBook Cover

eBook | Building a Skilled and Capable Workforce in the Food Industry

alfalfa sprouted seeds

Salmonella-Tainted Alfalfa Sprouts Sicken 109 People in 11 European Countries, One Death Reported

building a skilled workforce ebook

Events

June 30, 2026

FSMA 204 in Practice: Building a Traceability-Ready Operation

Live: June 30, 2026 at 11:00 am EDT: Attend this webinar to learn how food businesses can move from fragmented records toward a more reliable approach for recall response, FDA requests, and supply chain visibility.

July 21, 2026

Using AI Responsibly in Food Safety Management Systems

Live: July 21, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: This webinar will provide participants with guidance on how to effectively use generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools to develop key components of a food safety management system (FSMS).

August 6, 2026

Beyond Sanitation: Understanding the Hidden System Conditions That Allow Pathogens to Persist

Live: August 6, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT: Attend this webinar to learn strategies for strengthening environmental control programs through a layered approach to pathogen management.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • scientist holding pipe and pipette microscope in background

    UKHSA Publishes Updated Guidelines on Interpreting Microbial Test Results for RTE Foods at Retail

    See More
  • Neogen’s NeoNet Grants Easy Access to Food Facility Sanitation Test Results

    See More
  • FSS recalls generic image

    Sacramento laboratory fakes pesticide test results, thousands of pounds of marijuana recalled

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 1118474600.jpg

    Practical Food Safety: Contemporary Issues and Future Directions

  • 9781138198463.jpg

    Food Safety Management Programs: Applications, Best Practices, and Compliance

  • 1119053595.jpg

    Food Safety for the 21st Century: Managing HACCP and Food Safety throughout the Global Supply Chain, 2E

See More Products
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

Newsletters | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing