Food Safety
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • ENEWSLETTER >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
RegulatoryFDAFSMA

Last Opportunity for Public Comment on FSMA Regulations

November 18, 2014

Since the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) was signed into law in 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) rule-making efforts have been laborious. Faced with the overwhelming task of implementing the most comprehensive reform of this nation’s food safety system in more than 70 years, FDA understandably moved cautiously. But delays in regulations resulted in public criticism, which peaked with the filing of a lawsuit against FDA by the Center for Food Safety and Center for Environmental Health. Whether in spite of or because of these outside pressures, both 2013 and 2014 have seen a flurry of proposed FSMA regulations, public meetings and public comments.

FDA has organized its efforts around what it refers to as the “7 Pillars” of FSMA. These Pillars include Preventive Controls for Human Food, Preventative Controls for Animal Food, Produce Safety, Sanitary Transportation, Food Defense, Foreign Supplier Verification and Third Party Auditor Rules. The publication of each proposed regulation was followed by a public comment period during, which various interested persons, companies and groups had the opportunity to voice support, raise concerns or make alternative suggestions.

The public comment period on each of these original proposed regulations has closed. But those comments led FDA to determine that revisions were necessary in some instances. Thus, on September 29, 2014, four supplemental rules were published that pertain to Preventative Controls for Human Food, Preventative Controls for Animal Food, Produce Safety and Foreign Supplier Verification. These supplemental rules remain open for public comment only until December 15, 2014. After that date, these FSMA regulations will be closed for comment and the opportunity to provide input before the FDA’s issuance of final rules will have come to an end.

A summary of the regulations still open for comment is set forth below:

A. Human Food Risk Analysis:
Original Proposed Regulation: Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Food for Animals, Docket Number: FDA-2011-N-0920, was issued on 1/16/2013. Public comment period closed on 11/22/2013.

Supplemental Regulation: Issued on 9/29/2014. Public comment period will close on 12/15/2014.

Highlights of the supplemental rule include the following:

1. The original definition of hazard analysis and risk based preventative controls was based in large part on Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) regulations. FDA specifically differentiated the FSMA Hazard Analysis to require that controls be considered at locations other than CCPs. To further emphasize the distinction, the supplemental rule provides that all references in the rule to “hazards reasonably likely to occur” (language also found in HACCP) will be stricken and changed to “significant hazards.” The term “significant hazard” analyzes both the severity of the potential hazard and the likelihood it will occur.

2. Where a Hazard Analysis determines it appropriate for the facility, the food and the nature of the preventative controls, product testing must be used to verify both implementation and verification of controls.

3. Environmental monitoring must be conducted as a means to verify implementation and verification of controls when a hazard analysis determines it appropriate for the facility, the food and the nature of the preventative controls if contamination of a ready-to-eat food with an environmental pathogen is a significant hazard.

4. Where a facility’s Hazard Analysis identifies a significant risk from raw materials or ingredients received from a supplier and that risk is appropriately managed before receipt, the rule requires a supplier verification control procedure.

5. In a change from the original rule, the facility’s Hazard Analysis must consider the possibility of economically motivated intentional adulteration.

Deadline for Final Rule: The deadline for issuance of a final rule is 8/30/2015. The proposed compliance date is 1 year after the issuance of the final rule, or 2 years for small businesses (employing fewer than 500 employees).

B. Animal Food Risk Analysis:    
Original Proposed Regulation: Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Food for Animals Docket Number: FDA-2011-N-0922, was issued on 10/29/2013. Public comment period closed on 2/26/14.

Supplemental Regulation: Issued on 9/29/2014. Public comment period will close on 12/15/2014.

Highlights of the supplemental rule include the following:

1. The original rule for the first time introduced current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMPs) for animal food. Those cGMPs were patterned after cGMPs for human food. The supplemental rule revises the proposed Animal cGMPs to be more particularly tailored to the manufacture of animal food.

2. Facilities that are subject to human food safety requirements and which sell by-products as an ingredient for animal food will not be subject to additional preventative controls or cGMPs, except as appropriate during any holding or distribution of the by-products.

3. All references in the rule to “hazards reasonably likely to occur” will be stricken and changed to “significant hazards.” (See, A.1. above).

4. Product testing must be conducted where a Hazard Analysis determines it appropriate. (See, A.2. above).

5. Environmental monitoring must be conducted where a Hazard Analysis determines it appropriate. (See, A.3. above).

6. Supplier verification controls must be conducted where appropriate. (See, A.4. above).

7. A facility’s Hazard Analysis must consider the possibility of economically motivated intentional adulteration. (See, A.5. above).

Deadline for Final Rule: The deadline for issuance of a final rule is 8/30/2015. The proposed compliance date is 1 year after the issuance of the final rule, 2 years for small businesses (employing fewer than 500 employees) or 3 years for very small businesses (< $2.5M in total annual sales of animal food).

C. Produce Safety:
Original Proposed Regulation: Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human Consumption, Docket Number: FDA-2011-N-0921, was issued on 1/16/2013. Public comment period closed on 11/22/2013.
 
Supplemental Regulation: Issued on 9/29/2014. Public comment period will close on 12/15/2014.

Highlights of the supplemental rule include the following:

1. The supplemental rule revises the proposed microbial standards for water used in the growing of produce. FDA is proposing a more tiered and targeted approach to the testing of untreated water. Farmers whose water does not initially meet the microbial standards will have alternative means to verify its safety and allow for its use.

2. The supplemental rule eliminates the previously proposed 9-month minimum interval between use of raw manure and crop harvest. For now, the issue will continue to be investigated by the FDA in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and others.

3. The supplemental rule also eliminates the proposed 45-day minimum interval between the use of compost containing manure and crop harvest so long as it is applied in a manner that prevents the likelihood of its contact with the produce both during and after application.

Deadline for Final Rule: The deadline for issuance of a final rule is 10/31/2015. The proposed compliance date is 2 years after the issuance of the final rule, 3 years for small businesses ($250,000 to $500,000 in annual produce sales) or 4 years for very small businesses ($25,000 to $250,000 in annual produce sales).

D. Foreign Supplier Verification:    
Original Proposed Regulation: Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs) for Importers of Food for Humans and Animals, Docket Number: FDA-2011-N-0143, was issued on 7/29/2013. Public comment period closed on 1/27/2014.

Supplemental Regulation: Issued on 9/29/2014. Public comment period will close on 12/15/2014.

Highlights of the supplemental rule include the following:

1. Importers conducting a hazard analysis must not only evaluate the risks related to the imported food, but must equally analyze risks relating to the foreign supplier when determining appropriate supplier verification methods. The supplier risks to be considered include: a) the entity’s application of hazard controls; b) the supplier’s safety procedures and safety performance history; c) the supplier’s compliance with U.S. food safety laws; and d) the hazards to the subject food.

2. The original proposed regulation offered two options for FSVPs. The supplement puts forth a broader approach, which requires the importer to evaluate the risks associated with the food and with the supplier in creating its verification procedures. The importer will have more flexibility to determine the verification processes and frequencies appropriate.

3. The concept of “hazards reasonably likely to occur” will be replaced with “significant hazards.” (See, A.1. above).

 4. An FSVP must consider the possibility of economically motivated intentional adulteration. (See, A.5. above).

Deadline for Final Rule: The deadline for issuance of a final rule is 10/31/2015. The proposed compliance date is 18 months after issuance of the final rule.

In summary, public comment on these proposed supplemental rules will close on 12/15/14. Final rules will be issued between August and October 2015. The new rules will have staggered enforcement dates, for most beginning 1 year later.

Kathy Hardee, Esq., is co-chair of the Food & Agriculture Industry Group at Polsinelli, PC, which is comprised of a team of attorneys from every legal practice area and who each have a focused background in the food industry.

 

>
Author(s): Kathy Hardee, Esq.

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Microbiological
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Facilities
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Contamination Control
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Subscribe For Free!
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to eNewsletter
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Two men standing in a produce storage facility having a discussion.
    Sponsored byOrkin Commercial

    Staying Compliant With FSMA

  • Deli Salads
    Sponsored byCorbion

    How Food Safety is Becoming the Ultimate Differentiator in Refrigerated and Prepared Foods

Popular Stories

FoodSafetyMattersFinal-900x550-(002).jpg

Ep. 195. Dr. Christopher Daubert: The Value of a Food Science Education

Students returning their lunch trays in a cafeteria

California Bill Would Remove Ultra-Processed Foods from School Lunches

Two men standing in a produce storage facility having a discussion.

Staying Compliant With FSMA

Events

June 26, 2025

How to Design and Conduct Challenge Studies for Safer Products and Longer Shelf Life

Live: June 26, 2025 at 2:00 pm EDT: During this webinar, attendees will learn how to conduct challenge studies for microbial spoilage and pathogen growth, including the common challenges encountered, laboratory selection, and use of predictive models.

May 11, 2026

The Food Safety Summit

Stay informed on the latest food safety trends, innovations, emerging challenges, and expert analysis. Leave the Summit with actionable insights ready to drive measurable improvements in your organization. Do not miss this opportunity to learn from experts about contamination control, food safety culture, regulations, sanitation, supply chain traceability, and so much more.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products
Environmental Monitoring Excellence eBook

Related Articles

  • Safe Food for Canadians Regulations Open for Public Comment

    See More
  • It's Official—FDA Extends Public Comment Period 120 Days for Proposed FSMA Rules

    See More
  • FDA Prolongs Public Comment Period for Proposed Rules on Food and Produce Safety

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 1119258073.jpg

    FSMA and Food Safety Systems: Understanding and Implementing the Rules

  • 1119160553.jpg

    Food Safety: Innovative Analytical Tools for Safety Assessment

  • 1118396308.jpg

    High Throughput Analysis for Food Safety

See More Products

Related Directories

  • On Target Packaging

    On Target Packaging is a production/maintenance servicer for combination and check weighers. We do not sell or process food, but provide service/repairs, and equipment for the food industry
  • International Association For Food Protection-IAFP

×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

eNewsletter | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing