Food Safety
search
Ask Food Safety AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • ENEWSLETTER >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
    • ASK FSM AI
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
Testing & AnalysisEnvironmental TestingMethods

NSF Report Reveals Critical Differences between ATP Hygiene Monitoring Systems

By Neogen
October 1, 2015

Both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service prescribe regulations that food contact surfaces should be free of contaminants and food allergens, and that the environment be clean and sanitary. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hygiene monitoring can play an important role in the verification of good sanitation practices and is also a major component of the Food Safety Modernization Act. Selection of the right ATP hygiene monitoring systems can be simplified by comparing performance data of commercially available systems using realistic sampling conditions.

However, as anyone who has tried to reproduce results created inside an R&D laboratory could tell you, things are a whole lot harder in the real world. What seems so easy in a controlled environment can seem so difficult when conditions are out of your control.

This is a similar problem that manufacturers and users of ATP monitoring systems face when evaluating the performance of their own systems, or competing systems, for use in their facilities to validate and verify the effectiveness of their sanitation programs. What works so well in controlled laboratory experiments does not necessarily work so well in fast-paced and highly variable food production environments.

“Many facilities rely on ATP systems to move forward with production runs and make important decisions on personnel performance, equipment serviceability, equipment selection and modifications to their Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures. For these reasons, it is critical that an ATP hygiene monitoring system provide accurate and consistent results,” says Neogen’s Rob Soule. “When comparing these systems, it is important to use realistic evaluation criteria. Since these systems measure the amount of residue left on a surface after cleaning, studies that attempt to compare systems through direct pipetting of ATP, or a commodity, onto the sampling device’s tips, do not accurately reflect their use and miss the most critical source of sampling error—a swab’s ability to accurately and consistently extract residue remaining on the surface.”

In an effort to evaluate a number of commercially available ATP systems in real-world applications, NSF International conducted a battery of tests to objectively measure major commercial ATP hygiene monitoring systems in real-world scenarios to determine their accuracy and consistency.

To judge accuracy, a random ATP dot test was developed to evaluate the systems’ ability to recover ATP; to judge consistency, the systems’ coefficients of variation were evaluated for repeated performances on the random-dot test.  

To begin, ATP standards were pipetted directly onto sample swabs. ATP standards were then deposited over a 4 in.-by-4 in. stainless steel surface, allowed to dry and then sampled. This measurement was adapted to replicate real-world operations that most often occur between tightly scheduled production runs where sampling speed is important.

In the real world, residue is not homogeneously distributed across a surface after cleaning. To re-create this phenomenon for the study, a small, invisible dot of ATP was randomly placed on stainless steel surfaces to determine the extent and consistency of each system’s ability to locate and accurately identify its presence. Ten replicates were completed on a single test day for each system.

Results of the random-dot test clearly showed that the AccuPoint Advanced system had the highest recovery of the test systems. With its flat sponge sampler, AccuPoint Advanced consistently found and accurately reported the presence of the ATP dot expressed as percent recovery. Accurate recovery of ATP from surfaces is critical in making sound decisions about whether a surface is clean or not.

As important as trace detection of existing ATP on a production surface is, a system’s ability to consistently detect levels of existing ATP is as important. As reported by the coefficient of variation, the AccuPoint Advanced system had the lowest variability of the commercial systems at 17.5%.

In a production environment, misrepresentation of the amount of ATP on a surface can result in the decision to continue with production when a surface is not truly clean or the decision to hold off on the next production run until further, potentially unnecessary, cleaning is performed.

NSF’s report stated that “Neogen’s AccuPoint Advanced ATP system consistently yielded the highest percentage of recoveries and the most consistent readings of the target analytes, when compared with the other four test systems.

“ATP devices are utilized to detect the presence of bacteria and organic/food residues on surfaces. ATP has been incorporated as a key monitoring parameter for the food, beverage and healthcare industries. It is essential that these devices provide precise and consistent readings so that the hygiene practices of these industries can be accurately evaluated.”

As the finalization of FSMA looms on the horizon and the deadlines for compliance draw near, these data are of the utmost importance. A greater significance will be placed on environmental monitoring in food production facilities.

For more information, or a copy of the NSF report, please contact Neogen at 800.234.5333 or 517.372.9200 • www.neogen.com

>
Author(s): Neogen

Looking for quick answers on food safety topics?
Try Ask FSM, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask FSM →

Share This Story

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Microbiological
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Sanitation
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Contamination Control
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to eNewsletter
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Salmonella bacteria
    Sponsored byThermoFisher

    Food Microbiology Testing Methods: Salmonella species

  • a diagram explaining indicator organisms
    Sponsored byHygiena

    How Proactive Listeria Testing Helps Prevent Six- and Seven-Figure Recalls

  • woman grocery shopping
    Sponsored byCorbion

    Designing Safety Into Every Bite: Proactive Risk Mitigation for Refrigerated Foods

Popular Stories

NRTE breaded stuffed chicken

USDA Indefinitely Delays Enforcement of Salmonella as Adulterant in Raw Breaded, Stuffed Chicken

digital map of europe

EU Publishes Food Fraud Tool Mapping Thousands of Cases Since 2016

non-conforming product

How to Handle Non-Conforming Product

Events

December 11, 2025

How to Develop and Implement an Effective Food Defense Strategy

Live: December 11, 2025 at 2:00 pm EDT: From this webinar, attendees will learn common areas where companies encounter challenges in their food defense strategies and how to address them.

May 11, 2026

The Food Safety Summit

Stay informed on the latest food safety trends, innovations, emerging challenges, and expert analysis. Leave the Summit with actionable insights ready to drive measurable improvements in your organization. Do not miss this opportunity to learn from experts about contamination control, food safety culture, regulations, sanitation, supply chain traceability, and so much more.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products

Related Articles

  • Next Generation ATP Systems: More than Sanitation Monitoring

    See More
  • 3M CleanTrace Hygiene Monitoring and Management System

    Study: Not all hygiene monitoring systems produce stable, consistent test results

    See More
  • Understanding the Differences between Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 1119258073.jpg

    FSMA and Food Safety Systems: Understanding and Implementing the Rules

  • 1119071127.jpg

    Food Safety, Risk Intelligence and Benchmarking

  • 9781032369990 (1).webp

    Food Safety Quality Control and Management

See More Products

Related Directories

  • NSF

    Since 1944, NSF has stood at the forefront of global efforts to improve human and planet health. As an independent, internationally recognized organization, we play a pivotal role in the development of robust public health standards. NSF engages in the rigorous testing, auditing, and certification of various products and services.
  • BioSafe Systems

    BioSafe Systems provides food safety solutions with peroxyacetic acid (PAA) and Smart Technology. Our advance chemistry and OxyFusion, on-site, on-demand PAA generator, automates food safety compliance, reduce cost, and increase productivity. Our Smart Technology automates monitoring, dosing, and generates customizable data reports that are blockchain compatible. We continue to innovate solutions for food safety.
  • ITEC Frontmatec Hygiene

    ITEC has been a strong name in the food industry for over 25 years and is a Frontmatec brand for innovative hygiene equipment and systems. We have a worldwide network of partners to support customers at home and abroad, helping them to compete in global markets. High quality, pragmatism and reliability are the basis for long-term partnerships and sustainable growth.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

eNewsletter | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing