Food Safety
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Food Safety
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • White Papers
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Contamination Control
    • Food Types
    • Management
    • Process Control
    • Regulatory
    • Sanitation
    • Supply Chain
    • Testing and Analysis
  • PODCAST
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Food Safety Five Newsreel
    • eBooks
    • FSM Distinguished Service Award
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • Videos
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • MORE
    • ENEWSLETTER >
      • Archive Issues
      • Subscribe to eNews
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
  • WEBINARS
  • FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!

Applying HACCP Strategies to Pathogen Detection Methods

August 1, 2014


The development of effective Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) is crucial to enhancing quality and mitigating risk within food manufacturing. With increasing regulations, new technology and greater demand, more scrutiny is being placed on the implementation and monitoring of these HACCP strategies.

One tool in developing a HACCP plan is the failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), which provides a weighted metric to apply to a HACCP strategy that analyzes potential error and provides a roadmap for implementing effective risk mitigation strategies.

By combining a solid HACCP plan with FMEA, and diligently monitoring program effectiveness, a higher quality product is achiev-able with lower risk. Incorporating the correct monitoring tool such as a pathogen detection test is as important as the program itself.

However, pathogen detection methods vary considerably in their complexity (number of steps), requirements for manual manipulation (touches) and analytical performance. It is critical to incorporate a pathogen test that upholds similar, if not greater, rigor than that of the HACCP program it is being utilized to monitor.

What is FMEA?
Failure mode and effect analysis is a method that identifies and quantifies method constraints and steps with potential process variation to quantify risk in each test method. It is a calculation of the total number of steps in a process, the total times the sample (or equivalent) is touched by an operator and a weighting of the risk associated with the failure mode. The weighting includes factors such as severity of the risk to the overall outcome of the result, the frequency at which the error may occur as well as the likelihood of an operator detecting the error or defect and intervening. These are all calculated to determine a risk priority number (RPN), where a lower number indicates a lower risk related to that particular method.

RPN = Severity • Frequency • Detection

Total RPN = SUM (RPN)

Applications to Pathogen Detection Methods
For example, let’s use something as seemingly innocuous as a heat block, which can represent a single failure mode in an assay that requires its use. The protocol may state, “Place lysis tube in a heat block at 37°C (1±2°C) for 30 minutes.” The potential risk is that the heat block is out of the 37°C specification, with an outcome of insufficient lysing that could lead to a false-negative result. The current controls in place are a thermometer and temperature dial on the apparatus.

Severity = 9: If cells do not lyse, there is a high risk for error.

Frequency = 1: It does not occur that often.

Detection = 5: Thermometer and heat block must be frequently and properly calibrated, and operator review is required each time samples are added.

RPN = 9 • 1 • 5 = 45

The above is an example of a single step in a protocol. As the protocol becomes more complex, requiring more steps and more operator interventions, the quality and consistency of the result suffer. Ultimately, the result may provide a skewed and erroneous view of the effectiveness of the control plan it is being used to monitor.

Differences in Current Methods
A recent review of different pathogen detection methods was recently published for Salmonella and Listeria spp. detection for a number of different vendors. This study reviewed the product inserts of 16 different kits, identified potential failure modes and developed an RPN as discussed above for each assay.

The study showed that minimizing the number of process steps as well as the number of touches per sample, and including automation that incorporates process control features, significant improvements of the overall quality of the final result were obtained.

Summary
In summary, quality and safety are the highest priorities of the food industry. Considerable investment and effort are taken to develop and implement effective HACCP plans. However, many of these plans are being monitored by methods that may not meet the same level of rigor being applied to the manufacturing process and therefore are not providing the accuracy in monitoring that the manufacturer may require.

By applying similar tools as those used to develop HACCP strategies, such as FMEA and Lean Six Sigma, to the laboratory for pathogen testing, a scale for risk impact can be applied to these methods. This scale of risk impact enables a manufacturer to make an informed choice as to which methods best meet the criteria of its facility. The results of this analysis prove that when FMEA is applied, those methods that incorporate the proper automation with reduced operator intervention will provide the highest quality data, enabling the clearest understanding of the effectiveness and changes occurring within the HACCP process.

The full report can be found at www.food-safety.com/signature-series/fmea.

www.rokabio.com


Author(s): Roka Bioscience

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • people holding baby chicks

    Serovar Differences Matter: Utility of Deep Serotyping in Broiler Production and Processing

    This article discusses the significance of Salmonella in...
    Methods
    By: Nikki Shariat Ph.D.
  • woman washing hands

    Building a Culture of Hygiene in the Food Processing Plant

    Everyone entering a food processing facility needs to...
    Facilities
    By: Richard F. Stier, M.S.
  • graphical representation of earth over dirt

    Climate Change and Emerging Risks to Food Safety: Building Climate Resilience

    This article examines the multifaceted threats to food...
    Contamination Control
    By: Maria Cristina Tirado Ph.D., D.V.M. and Shamini Albert Raj M.A.
Subscribe For Free!
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Subscribe to eNewsletter
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Website Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Food Safety Magazine audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Food Safety Magazine or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Two men standing in a produce storage facility having a discussion.
    Sponsored byOrkin Commercial

    Staying Compliant With FSMA

  • Deli Salads
    Sponsored byCorbion

    How Food Safety is Becoming the Ultimate Differentiator in Refrigerated and Prepared Foods

Popular Stories

Image of produce being washed on a conveyor belt in a facility

Science in Action: How Nanobubbles Are Advancing Food Safety Standards

FoodSafetyMattersFinal-900x550-(002).jpg

Ep. 195. Dr. Christopher Daubert: The Value of a Food Science Education

Students returning their lunch trays in a cafeteria

California Bill Would Remove Ultra-Processed Foods from School Lunches

Events

June 26, 2025

How to Design and Conduct Challenge Studies for Safer Products and Longer Shelf Life

Live: June 26, 2025 at 2:00 pm EDT: During this webinar, attendees will learn how to conduct challenge studies for microbial spoilage and pathogen growth, including the common challenges encountered, laboratory selection, and use of predictive models.

May 11, 2026

The Food Safety Summit

Stay informed on the latest food safety trends, innovations, emerging challenges, and expert analysis. Leave the Summit with actionable insights ready to drive measurable improvements in your organization. Do not miss this opportunity to learn from experts about contamination control, food safety culture, regulations, sanitation, supply chain traceability, and so much more.

View All

Products

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

Global Food Safety Microbial Interventions and Molecular Advancements

See More Products
Environmental Monitoring Excellence eBook

Related Articles

  • two lab techs looking at test tubes

    USDA-FSIS Decides on Fit-for-Purpose Pathogen Detection Methods, Updates Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook

    See More
  • sampling strategies

    Simulation of Sampling Strategies for Food Safety: A New Tool for Improved Sampling Performance

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 1119053595.jpg

    Food Safety for the 21st Century: Managing HACCP and Food Safety throughout the Global Supply Chain, 2E

  • 1444333348.jpg

    Handbook of Food Safety Engineering

  • 1119160553.jpg

    Food Safety: Innovative Analytical Tools for Safety Assessment

See More Products

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • September 19, 2024

    Selling Food Safety to Top Management: Strategies for Success

    On Demand: This webinar will cover how to approach top management with FSQ issues and requests.
View AllSubmit An Event

Related Directories

  • Anritsu - Product Inspection & Detection

    Anritsu manufactures product inspection and detection equipment for food and pharma industries. Part of the Product Quality Assurance division of Anritsu Corp., we advance quality control programs with high-performing and reliable solutions. Our X-Ray Systems, Checkweighers, Metal Detectors, Combo Systems, Rejectors, and QuiCCA Software provide a superior ROI and ensure compliance with stringent quality control programs while protecting your brand. Our local branches in the US, Europe, Brazil, and Mexico are equipped with in-house service & parts dept., we deliver, install, and maintain in record time. With over 200,000 installations, we are the brand that is trusted to protect the safety and security of your customers.
  • Nestle Quality Assurance Center Dublin

    The Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC) Dublin provides the analytical testing businesses need to ensure product safety for consumers. We have supported the food industry world-wide for over three decades and offer an expansive portfolio of over 200 methods to meet your food safety testing needs.
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the food safety industry

eNewsletter | Website | eMagazine

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing