Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are crops or animals whose genetic material has been artificially manipulated by way of genetic engineering. GMOs can be used to limit the adverse effects of insects, disease, and drought, and can also amplify the food growth process or enhance the levels of beneficial vitamins or nutrients in the food in question.[1,2]
The GMO Money Trail
As genetically modified technology continues to be developed, some sectors are seeing the economic benefits--especially farmers. Because of this technology, a new trait of drought-tolerant corn is now available, according to Shane Kinne, director of public policy for the Missouri Corn Growers Association. Kinne says that a secondary benefit is that genetically modified crops will also help to feed a rapidly growing world population.[3]
Labeling Laws in Limbo
GMO labeling is clearly a hot topic. Consumer demand for GMO food labeling as well as foods that do not contain GMOs is strong. Only a couple states have successfully passed GMO labeling laws while most have not.
General Views on GMO Labeling
PROS:
• Consumers have the right to know what’s in their food and be able to make their own choices.
• Some people adhere to religious/ethical dietary restrictions. Labels will help them to make informed decisions.
• The long-term health implications of GMOs are not well-known yet.
• Many other countries have already established some form of mandatory labeling.
• If genetically modified food is in fact safe, the government should have no problem adding labels to applicable food items.
CONS:
• Labeling is expensive and the cost would be passed down to consumers.
• Labels imply that the product is harmful or of lower quality.
• Consumers already have the option to buy verified non-genetically modified or certified organic foods. Labeling would be an unnecessary and costly duplication.
• Additional food labeling could lead to more consumer confusion, especially when food label rules vary by state.
• In other countries, mandatory labeling hasn’t made a significant consumer impact, but it has eliminated genetically modified products from shelves due to consumer skepticism.
• The current infrastructure of the food industry could not sufficiently accommodate the need for segregating genetically modified and non-genetically modified products.